A
non-Police State
The Police Department celebrated its 138th anniversary since its
founding this week, but they do so in the face of challenging times
for its own credibility. Take the crime figures. A killing every
six hours; a rape also every six hours; a serious robbery by the
hour and a house-breaking and theft every 31 minutes, 31 seconds.
Crime
seems to be rampant, with the populated Western Province facing
the brunt of it. While it is commendable that the Police Department
has collated and analysed the figures, crime prevention is clearly
the crying need of the hou
r.
Especially at a time when the cost-of-living is soaring to a point
where it actually hurts most people, young people are without work,
and as we pointed out last week, population growth is stripping
economic growth, when limited resources have to be shared by a bigger
number, increased crime becomes a natural by-product.
Politicians
of all hues have been known promoters of crime in this country,
and policemen their eager accomplices. It was therefore heartening
to hear Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse and the UNP deputy leader
Karu Jayasuriya urge the police to combat this surge in crime, even
if they were mere statements made for the cameras from elevated
desks. Yet, even if political parties cannot come together on other
vital issues of national importance, speaking in one voice and rallying
together to curb and eradicate this menace will be a good start
for a national campaign.
So,
when the cabinet took up the issue of the Police for discussion
last week, it was indeed a sad state of affairs when the criticism
of the top brass was for not permitting the Prime Minister's security
entourage to park at the Parliament complex, and the bashing of
demonstrating trade unionists, but nary a word about rising crime
statistics. That was the priority shown to policing at the apex
level of Government.
While
the forces of good must join hands, the Police Department, the main
player on the scene needs more dynamism in grappling with crime.
They are running out of excuses - lack of personnel, political interference
and terrorism duty.
Personnel,
they have aplenty, so much so, that many within their ranks are
part of the problem. The advent of the National Police Commission,
with all their faults, is a valuable step forward in de-politicising
the Service. Some of its detractors, entitled as they are to find
legitimate faults in the workings of this independent Commission,
will surely not opt to return to the days when the ruling party
politician dictated terms.
There
appears to be a campaign to find fault with the National Police
Commission, and there are plenty of faults to find. The solution
however is not to go back to the bad old days, and bad old ways,
of not-so-long-ago. To use an old phrase, we must not throw out
the baby with the bath-water. The solution is to restore the pride
of those privileged to wear the khaki uniform, which will earn them
the respect their illustrious predecessors of some-years-ago enjoyed.
It
is time to go back to the policing methods of yesteryear. For the
bulk of the crimes committed today remain the traditional crimes
of murder, rape, robbery, house-breaking, pick-pocketing and snatching.
Unfortunately, the policeman-on-the-beat is a thing of the past.
There is, alas, no such thing as the neighbourhood cop doing his
rounds any more.
A
popular story that did the rounds recently is how a duty-conscious
traffic policeman stopped a driver for speeding. While he was writing
out a ticket, he also flagged down a Pajero, obviously of a VIP,
flying past. The VIP had asked the policeman whether he was insane
to stop him because Pajeros and such luxury vehicles, specially
imported by politicos were meant to speed. When he drove off arrogantly,
the policeman, in all fairness, had let the other driver off as
well. Can we blame the policeman for deciding that what is sauce
for the goose should also be sauce for the gander? The only silver
lining to the story was that the Pajero stopped at all.
Concomitant
with asking the police to roll up their sleeves, and the politician
to lay off from interfering is the need to change the mindset of
police personnel that they are engaged in a mundane, poorly-paid
and thankless job. Most public servants probably feel that way,
particularly when they see others flaunting their ill-gotten wealth.
It can be discouraging.
Reviewing
their salaries does not seem to be an option of a Government that
is struggling to make ends meet. Policemen are not the best paid
anywhere in the world, even where crime has been tackled effectively.
A handsome reward scheme, financial and promotional, might be one
method of providing the policeman and policewoman recognition of
their services.
Righting
these wrongs would be a Herculean task; what would look like an
impossibility. The faint hearted would simply give up and let the
downhill trend take its course. Only the brave hearts can make the
difference. |