Nothing
wrong in IMF's 'cooperation' policies
Revolutionary Marxists in Sri Lanka canvass for the present system
to be replaced by a new one, as opposed to reformists who believe
that the capitalist system can be made "kinder and gentler".
The
age of imperialism with domination of finance capital and monopolies,
and the total subjugation of the colonial world to the will of the
major powers, the Marxists were potential allies of the proletariat
when demanding cheap credits for the small farmers and small businessmen,
agitating that within the capitalist system these layers are crushed
by the big business, monopolies and banks.
Marx,
Lenin and Trotsky would swallow their words if they heard the IMF
Senior Resident Representative making a presentation recently at
the oldest Club in Sri Lanka, reflecting how global partnerships
with the IMF can be made in Asia.
Through
working relationships between government and international agencies,
between multinational corporations and the people and between civil
society and donors, he advocated that a two-way partnership sharing
ideas, comparative advantages and sometimes, even resources be developed.
Jeremy
Carter went on to say that the IMF shares a strong commitment in
Asia to tackle the challenges of growth and poverty and that poverty
reduction can be made only with high levels of economic growth which
are sustained and broadened. He further went on to subscribe that
advanced economies must provide support with both aid and trade.
In
this context the IMF-Asian partnership, he said, was based on assistance
being more flexible, sharp and responsive and supportive of regional
integration. What is then wrong with these policies Mr. Marxist?
The
IMF policy prescription for Sri Lanka is, in the next six months,
to try and stabilize the economy, get people to cooperate, and attract
investments. For the medium term, the prescription was to tackle
poverty at its roots with specific focus on income, health, education,
access to services and markets, increase productivity through better
incentives, optimise the use of capital as the key to growth and
eliminate corruption in both public and private sector governance.
These
are true reformist policies fitting the present needs of the economy
and society in Sri Lanka, sans big hang ups, and down to earth with
focus on the masses.
In
view of the above IMF policy prescription, what could be so distasteful
to the "Marxist JVP", "capitalist UNP" and Mr.
Secretary to the Treasury? The IMF prescription with stress on "get
people to cooperate", appears to common-sense-driven civil
society as an acceptable way forward for Sri Lanka.
At
a time when none in politics, government, opposition, governance
and business is cooperating with each other, "cooperate"
has to be the main objective. JVP, for the sake of this nation and
its future, go back to the school of Trotskyism and study how your
fanatical and often ultra-left tactics and policies are leading
the way to Stalinism.
These
ideas on the need for a permanent revolution must now be tempered
down to a state of cooperating with the reformist polices of the
IMF.
Why
can't the UNP cooperate for the sake of future generations, instead
of fool hardily clamouring from every street corner, while banging
on kitchen utensils, demanding that the cost of living be brought
down and unrealistic salary increases and subsidies on petroleum
products and fertilizers be given? Mr. Secretary to the Treasury,
what is the rationale for your recent tantrums that the IMF and
the World Bank are dictating terms to Sri Lanka? What has irked
you to the rhetoric that "We must always have a disagreement
with the IMF and the World Bank?" Why not cooperate within
the IMF partnership prescription? Big brothers in big business why
not support the IMF policy prescription of investing, tackling productivity,
good governance and corruption (not limited only to codes of conduct
that gather dust) and directly link up in tackling poverty at its
root (not limited only to Social Charters and CSR conventions)
To
all of you, cooperate is the 'mantrum' message from civil society,
with a humble request to take a cue from Deepal Sooryarachchi, the
young marketer and evangelist on media, who has Krishnamurthy as
his guru, quoting the maha vakya of Vedhas, the predecessor of Hinduism
(not Marxism or Capitalism), " The truth is one but paths are
many". So let us all resolve to "cooperate" and seek
the truth with salvation for the majority of the Sri Lankan society
and for this purpose take many paths that converge on truth. |