Lessons
US poll offers Lanka
And so, the ' moral majority ' of America gave their incumbent President
George W. Bush a resounding re-election victory. He will now rule
not only America, but the world for the next four years. Unfortunately,
the world did not get a chance to vote.
Even
the most ardent Bush fan will admit that the US President is not
the best loved outside the shores of that sub-continent.Two of Sri
Lanka's senior world affairs commentators, Thalif Deen ( in New
York ) and Neville de Silva ( in London ) make their observations
on the outcome of this week's US Presidential elections on page
14 of this issue respectively. CNN's senior international affairs
correspondent Christiane Amanpour refers to the US President as
“stupendously unpopular " outside his country.
In
West Asia, the moderates were deeply disappointed, while the extremists
drew vicarious delight on the basis that another four years was
what America needed to reap the whirlwind Bush has sown. And the
message of al-Qaeda's patron saint Osama bin-Laden on the eve of
the elections that a victory for the incumbent President would mean
that the American people are now culpable for the atrocities committed
in Iraq and elsewhere in the Islamic world is enough to send shivers
down anyone's spine.
In
any election, each voter has just one vote - to vote on multiple
issues. To consider the Bush victory a referendum on his foreign
policy cannot be the case.
Many
analysts say that he targeted the US voters' religious core. He
connected with faith and social values, perhaps making them overlook
negatives on his Iraq policy, the economy and jobs. For him to have
carried the state of Ohio where job-loss was severe is the classic
example. Only the liberal states on the coast picked his opponent.
The
Republicans were better organised and had more money to spend on
an election that is estimated to have cost US $ 3.4 billion. But
ultimately President Bush fell back on America's conservative roots
and whipped up religion to win.
There
are lessons to be learnt from the US elections. However bitterly
contested and acrimonious, there was no violence. Everyone got up
the next morning as Americans, of one deeply divided, but helluva
proud nation. That's what the winning candidate said, that's what
the loser said.
There
are many other exemplary lessons. For instance, the fixed term of
office for a President. Look what's happening in Sri Lanka now.
A President has been re-elected and officially sworn-in before the
nation. A secret oath-taking ceremony is supposed to have taken
place some months later and is now being considered the official
one, so that the President can have another year in office.
As
we said in these columns last week, it was not for Sri Lanka to
back either candidate. Bi-partisanship on all sides is paramount.
The fact that many Sri Lanka supporters won re-election to the US
Senate and as Governors is a positive sign for US — Sri Lanka
relations. Our ties with the new US Congress are good and provide
a strong platform to solidify the partnership. Our relations with
the Republicans and Democrats at all levels must be maintained for
an enduring relationship with that mega-power.
There
is however the need for Sri Lanka not to under-perform. The Bush
Administration wants strong allies, and they will do anything for
you then. In the current context, they want Sri Lanka to perform,
both on the economic front and on the peace process.
There
is no need for Sri Lanka to abandon its traditional solidarity with
the economically poor nations of this world, and back the US view
on the world economic order, nor compromise on its sovereignty for
the sake of jump-starting the peace process. But aimlessly doing
nothing about anything, with no substantive policy towards either,
is not going to win US support.
Meanwhile,
President Chandrika Kumaratunga is now in India, with hardly any
proper notice given to the public as to the status of her visit.
This may seem a trifling matter but Sri Lanka is a functioning democracy
and such proprieties should be observed.
Like
in the case with the US, Sri Lanka's new friendship thrust with
India ought to be based on a firm, equal status partnership. This
may evoke a smirk considering the relative muscle of the US or India
compared to puny Sri Lanka, but if we are a sovereign nation, we
should conduct our external relations as one.
There
is suddenly an increasing belief that there is an overwhelming Indian
economic presence in Sri Lanka. Friendship with India is unquestionable.
But get too close and you can hear the breathing down your neck.
It may be our small nation complex, but you can hear it, nevertheless. |