Short
term economic perspectives
Putting into place the correct economic policies is half the requirement
for economic growth. The other half includes institutional reform
and social engineering. All these components for economic growth
require a long-term perspective and commitment. That long-term perspective
and commitment is sadly lacking in Sri Lanka. The preoccupation
with current problems prevents any resolution of the fundamental
problems faced by the economy.
The
forthcoming budget that we are looking forward to may say some of
the right things; even dole out figures favourable for long-term
growth, but the final outturn is not likely to match the rhetoric.
No doubt immediate political imperatives are at the root of this
problem of short-termism. All democracies suffer from this defect,
ours probably more than most others.
Among
the fundamental problems that will remain unresolved is adequate
taxation to meet the expenditure of government that we discussed
last week. Another illustration from recent months is the reluctance
to pass on the burdens cast by the oil price hike to consumers thereby
increasing the fiscal deficit and increasing the public debt. This
fundamental weakness continues to grow rather than diminish. On
the other hand, needed curtailment of costs is also not resorted
to owing to political imperatives.
There
are many reasons for this state of affairs. The constitution of
the country is at the base. With the inability of any single party
to obtain a clear majority, incumbent governments are unable to
take bold decisions. The fact that they are also constituent political
elements makes the task even more difficult. The lack of a political
consensus between the two leading parties means that governments
use economic policies to pander to the people rather that adopt
them for long-term economic development.
There
are yet other reasons for the prevalence of these economic policy
perspectives. People at large have a mistaken idea about governments.
They are of the view that governments are able to dole out benefits
ad infinitum. There is no realisation that what governments give
is given by the resources of the people. The government is seen
as a source apart from the people's resources.
Fundamental
to this attitude is the low proportion of people that are income
tax payers. In countries where the income tax base is broad, whenever
a government promises reliefs or extra expenditures, people ask
the question from where do the resources come? Are we going to be
taxed more? In countries like the US or UK voters are conscious
that " there is no such thing as a free lunch".
In
Sri Lanka people pay for the dole outs through increased taxes on
commodities, inflation and cuts in development expenditure. Overall
long-term economic growth and development are sacrificed and the
country remains underdeveloped.
A
change in these perspectives and the political setup is indeed vital
for long-term economic development. Neither the political culture
nor the values that we have developed over time are likely to change
in the foreseeable future. In the meanwhile we can comfort ourselves
with Keynes celebrated saying the "in the long run we are all
dead". |