Lankan
linked to terrorism seeking refuge in HK
An unidentified LTTE member is seeking political asylum in Hong
Kong on the grounds that his life is in danger if he returns to
Sri Lanka but his fate will be decided after an investigation into
his claim that he was "tortured' in his motherland, a leading
newspaper in Hong Kong reported last week.
The
status of the man, who was not named for legal reasons, is "uncertain"
owing to a snag in Hong Kong's legal system as well as the unusual
nature of his case, the Standard quoted his legal representative
Mark Daly as saying.
The
man has admitted in court documents to being a member of the LTTE
and has been seeking refugee status since 2000, but one factor confusing
the case is that Hong Kong has no legislation dealing with refugee
status.
The
39-year-old man, who said he worked as a driver in Sri Lanka, claims
he first fled the country in 1986 to escape torture and persecution
from the government. The man, who is free on bail after being detained
for violating immigration laws, is living with his wife and three
young children, who joined him in 2001. He is not allowed to work
until interviews with immigration officials establish whether his
torture claims are valid, the paper said.
The
family is being sustained by donations from non-governmental organisations,
the paper reported. In his application for a judicial review filed
in the HK High Court in March this year, his lawyer argued that
to deport him would be unlawful after he claimed he was tortured
and had told "he would be the first person to be killed'' after
a 2000 arrest in Sri Lanka in connection with a failed bombing.
The
Hong Kong Immigration Department had previously issued a deportation
order against the man before investigating his torture claims, according
to his application. The man has also admitted he had previously
been in contact with high-ranking LTTE members and had provided
various forms of informal assistance to the rebel organisation.
Since
his arrival in Hong Kong, he has been granted successive extensions
of stay until March 2003, when he was detained on immigration grounds
and initially turned down a request for bail, saying he was a "clear
danger to the peace, order and security'' of Hong Kong. The argument
was based on undisclosed intelligence.
In
July, however, he was freed but he has to report to the Immigration
Department each day and is not allowed to leave Hong Kong Island,
according to a court order.
Immigration
officers are now assessing his torture claims, but it is unclear
what would become of him regardless of whether the findings prove
positive or negative and the Immigration authorities have refused
to comment on whether the man would be allowed to stay if his torture
claims were proved, the paper added.
A
spokesman would only say the examination would be conducted with
a "high standard of fairness" and that the officers interviewing
the man have expertise with asylum-seekers.
Hong
Kong's United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees rejected the
man's application for refugee status in March last year because
he was suspected of committing "a serious non-political crime".
The rejection has left the Hong Kong government with the task of
taking up his case. |