Questions
and answers
In case most Sri Lankans coming of age in these strange times have
never noticed - - there is a principle in constitutional law called
the doctrine of separation of powers. It means, to put it with as
little decoration as possible, that the Executive, the Legislature
and the Judiciary act totally independently of each other.
But
with a constitution that has been structured on the principle of
the intermingling of powers, Sri Lankans should be accorded separate
honours if they even knew that the so-called separation of powers
doctrine existed. So when the President stepped into the Legislature
the other day and had a few fine words with her Ministers of Cabinet,
nothing seemed to be amiss. Who cares that even an appearance of
a separation of powers is absent - - when the entire principle has
itself been summarily thrown overboard?
Forgetting
therefore the niceties of appearance and the glamour of political
cosmetics - - we need to ask the question "where are we headed
in real and concrete terms in this country when a ceasefire agreement
is dangerously close to ending, and the economic future of the country
is at best just salvageable, maybe with a bit of luck?''
But,
before we start nattering like the newspaper nabobs are, there needs
to be some appraisal of the plus side. Months ago, there was no
sign that this country will have anything that resembled a stable
government. Now there is one. A budget has been presented and will
be passed. The wheels of state are in motion.
But,
now that we have figured out that we indeed have a functioning government,
its natural that people come to the important question of what this
government can do for us. Cut to the bone, the question is “can
this President and her government salvage the peace -- and do at
least what precious little can be done to revitalize aspects of
governance such as the Rule of Law, and revamp the country's infrastructure
for real - not cosmetic - economic development?''
On
all counts, to put it very mildly, there are miles to go before
this government can sleep. The inconvenient reality is that people
do not have anything in terms of a solid answer for any of the above
questions.
Our
man in New York?
Sri Lanka is fielding Jayantha Dhanapala as a candidate
for the United Nation's Secretary General's job, and the announcement
is cause for some excitement, at least in the rarefied diplomatic
community. Dhanapala is now vying for the post at a time when it
is widely held that it's an Asian's turn to hold the job. So, there
is a regional joust out there to secure the job, even though it
may be couched in genteel diplomatic manoeuvre. Among likely candidates
are Sashi Tharoor for instance, a UN under Secretary of Information
who is also an author of a set of somewhat racy though engaging
novels, among them "Show Business'' about the Bollywood film
culture.
Judging
by the quality of diplomats in contention, Dhanapala's candidacy
may almost be a long shot, but that's not the issue. His nomination
has to be looked at in the backdrop of the country's hoary history
of candidates for international posts losing out to competitors
due to the utter ineptness of the 'campaigns' launched on their
behalf. The late H. W. Jayewardene unsuccessfully ran for a slot
in the International Court of Justice. Senaka Bandarnaike lost by
two votes in his high profile run for the UNSESCO Secretary General's
spot.
Tyronne
Fernando's self-propelled bid for the top job in the UN set a modern
record in terms of hyperbole -- and financial excess. Foreign Ministry
money was spent on a jet setting campaign run, in what can be described
as a candidature which was dead on arrival because no one gave Mr.
Fernando any realistic chance with his lack of experience in international
diplomacy. When Mr Lakshman Kadirgarmar ran for the Commonwealth
Secretary Generalship his candidacy was not supported either in
terms of funds or savvy. In this context, Dhanapals's run would
be an uphill task, unless a ruthlessly efficient effort is launched
to win the support of friendly countries. All this needs financial
backing of no mean order, and it is highly questionable whether
the government has the wherewithal for that.
It
is possible that Mr Dhanapala's nomination would however receive
a serious look-in from the regional allies, because this is a time
that the UN Secretary General's job is of great import to the developing
world. Most of the noises for instance demanding that the incumbent
Kofi Anan be coughed-out seem to be coming from the United States
where Mr Annan in his own stubborn way made a nuisance of himself
with his upright comments on the issue of the invasion of Iraq.
In
the current mood of George W. Bush the US President, this may have
sounded like rank insubordination, even though Mr. Annan is a paid
international civil servant carrying out the duties of the world's
most important independent diplomatic posting. Though it maybe time
for a Kofi break - the best man should win in UN the succession
stakes. |