Areas
that had natural protection in the form of sand dunes and mangroves
escaped the worst of the tsunami. Dilshath Banu writes
Saved by the sand
The sea breeze touches you even though you are some distance from
the shore. Surrounding the area is lush forest. This is the Bundala
National Park, which was declared the first Ramsar site in Sri Lanka.
Amidst
the greenery, lagoons, salterns, estuaries and mangrove swamps is
Indrani's Grocery Shop just large enough to hold two people. The
shop is filled with many items like seeni bole, which you may have
enjoyed more than ten years ago, sandwiched between newer goods.
"We
bring our goods from the town or from Hambantota. There's not much
business these days. Lots of people take loans from our shop, but
somehow I earn about Rs. 400-500 per day. Many people still come
to this shop, although we have two more shops in Bundala village,"
said Indrani, handing a packet of meatballs to an old man.
The
Bundala village was established more than a century ago by the British,
with many Englishmen using it as a convenient stop before travelling
to Yala the next day.
Now
350 families inhabit this village. Most are engaged in fisheries,
while others work in salterns and paddy farming. The tsunami has
hit this area as well, but Bundala village proper was protected
by the sand dunes along the coast, although the village is situated
below sea level.
Oruwella
was once a rich fisheries harbour and also the site of intense coral
mining. The tsunami turned Oruwella into a desert, most of it covered
by fast moving sand. Dayananda, who came back to Oruwella from a
nearby refugee camp said that he used to see three tractors full
of coral being transported every day. Dayananda also recalled that
in some villages, people used to build their houses using coral
instead of brick.
Sand
dunes and coral reefs are an integral part of the wetlands ecosystem
that plays a defensive role in the face of a catastrophe like the
tsunami. Bundala village and Oruwella are two examples of how wetlands
minimized the impact of the tsunami and how the tsunami won when
the wetlands were destroyed.
The
Ramsar Convention defines wetlands as areas of marsh, fen, peatland
or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary,
with water that is static or flowing.
There
are two kinds of wetlands- natural and man-made. Natural wetlands
include salt water wetlands, which consist of lagoons, estuaries,
mangroves, sea grass and coral reefs. The other is the inland fresh
water wetlands such as rivers, streams, marshes, swamp forest and
villus. Tanks, reservoirs, rice fields and salterns can be taken
as man-made wetlands.
"Sand
dunes are in fact, a terrestrial system. But they are associated
with coastal wetlands, because most are bounded by sand dunes. We
saw how the sand dune acted as a buffer for the Bundala village,"
said M. Sandun J. Perera, Assistant Programme Officer, Ecosystem
and Livelihoods Group in The World Conservation Union(IUCN). "On
the other hand, the Kalametiya fisheries harbour which was constructed
using the sand dune was completely destroyed by the tsunami. People
had cultivated coconut plantations and home gardens on that particular
sand dune as well.
Wetlands
in Sri Lanka are threatened by various forms of human activity.
In the Kapuhenwala estuary, the mangroves were thin due to human
intrusion, and all of them were destroyed. One of the main entry
points for the tsunami waves penetrating inland was the estuary
or lagoon mouths. However, Mr. Perera says that when the tsunami
water was funnelled into a lagoon, it would absorb the water and
prevent flooding. But if it is a river estuary, there is a possibility
of flooding unless there are swamp areas to absorb the water.
"If
you take the salterns for instance, Maha Lewaya in Hambantota, people
created artificial canals to drain the water to the sea. It is through
this outlet that the tsunami water funnelled in and destroyed everything.
And there were no mangroves associated with these man-made outlets
to minimize the destruction," said Mr. Perera. |