The
Kyoto Protocol dealing with global climate change has now been ratified
by many but not the USA, the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases
When the wind blows....
By Dr. Sriyanie Miththapala
The waves came. The waves damaged. The waves receded.
Amid the destruction, the debris and the dead, amid fears of recurrence,
scientists assured us that tsunamis were rare in the Indian Ocean,
and that the last tsunami to reach Sri Lanka occurred way back in
1883.
Many
queries have been raised about whether some of this damage could
have been avoided by an early warning system. Much has been debated
about how the coastal towns and villages should be rebuilt and where
they should be rebuilt.
Climatic
changes
Very little is being discussed about how our country should
be prepared for recurrent natural disasters. It seems that every
year, we, as a nation, struggle to deal with floods in the south,
landslides in the Sabaragamuwa province, cyclones in the east and
droughts in the southeast. It seems that every year, we are caught
unprepared.
Very
few people know that climate experts predict that extreme weather
events such as floods, cyclones, storms and droughts will become
more frequent in the future.
Very
few people pay attention to climate change and global warming. There
are now solid data that that human activities are resulting in the
warming of our planet, faster than any time in the past 10,000 years.
Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide and methane (collectively
called greenhouse gases) have increased since the time of the industrial
revolution. These gases function much like glass panes in a greenhouse,
allowing light in, but preventing heat from escaping. This greenhouse
effect, as it is commonly called, is important: without it, the
earth would be too cold for humans to live; too much of it and the
earth becomes too hot.
During
the last century, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has
risen by twelvefold. Our excessive use of coal and oil, our innumerable
vehicles that guzzle petrol and our factories are spitting out enormous
quantities of CO2 into atmosphere. Meanwhile we are decimating forests
that soak up CO2. Every year, about 23 billion metric tonnes of
CO2 are emitted into the atmosphere.
The
result of these emissions and the resultant increased greenhouse
effect is a distinct warming of the earth. During the last century,
global temperature increased by about 0.5°C - measured as the
largest increase in thousand years.
The
records are startling: the five hottest years on record are in the
last decade and this one. The 90s were the warmest decade in a century,
with 1998 as the hottest year on record.
The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has estimated that
global temperatures could rise by 1.4°C to 5.8°C during
the next century. So what is the big deal if the earth warms and
the 90s were the hottest decade in a century? So what if it gets
hotter still?
The
IPCC predicts that climate change could set off extreme weather
events such as intense rainstorms and cyclones, which result in
floods, and increased heat, which result in droughts. Fires, El
Niño and La Niña occurrences will become more frequent
they say, and arid regions in tropical countries like Sri Lanka
could become deserts. Temperate regions, on the other hand, could
become tropical.
Indeed,
2003 recorded extreme heat waves in Europe and India, with the consequence
that as many as 20,000 and 1,500 died of heatstroke in Europe and
India respectively. It was also the year where cyclonic activity
caused floods in Sri Lanka and left 350,000 homeless, 300 dead and
many missing. Last year, there was a higher-than-expected frequency
of hurricanes in southeastern USA. In total, the WHO reported that
climate change caused the deaths of 150,000 people in the world
in the year 2000. (These numbers pale into insignificance compared
to the magnitude of deaths and displacement due to the tsunami,
but note that these disasters, unlike the tsunami in the Indian
Ocean, are predicted to recur and recur frequently.)
The
ecological impacts
The ecological impacts of climate change are grave. Certain
ecosystems, such as mountains and coral reefs, are severely affected
and these, in turn, affect their species.
Since
1979, coral reefs have been seriously affected by recurrent global
mass bleaching whenever water temperatures have risen for more than
1°C for several weeks. In 1998, 16% of the world's corals were
destroyed because of mass bleaching. The destruction of coral reefs
affects coastal fisheries and leaves shorelines more vulnerable
to erosion.
Global
warming also results in melting glaciers. The extent of Arctic ice
and the glaciers in the European Alps have decreased drastically.
Among other impacts, shrinking glaciers will seriously affect downstream
water supplies.
Melting
glaciers in turn, result in sea-level rise. The current rate of
sea-level rise is three times the historical rate and sea levels
have already risen by 10-20 centimetres in the last century. The
IPCC predicts that global sea levels will rise between 0.09 to 0.88
metres by 2100. This could mean that many coastal countries and
cities such as Bangladesh, Mumbai and Bangkok could become inundated
by seawater.
In
addition, climate change will affect the planet's hydrology, causing
changes in seasonal flows. Dry areas will become drier, wet areas
could become wetter. Warming temperatures have been shown to result
in changes in the patterns of the flowering of plants in the spring,
colour changes of plants in autumn, migration of animals, hatching
of young and animal hibernation. When different species react differently
to this change in different patterns, interactions between species
could become disrupted. If many interactions are so affected, then
entire communities could become disrupted, and with them, their
ecosystems.
Further,
warmer temperatures are affecting the natural range, distributions
and densities of many species. Some tropical species are expanding
their ranges into temperate areas, and species adapted to the cold
are finding that they can't tolerate the heat. A startling projection
reveals that 15-37% of species from different regions may become
extinct by 2050 because of the impacts of climate change.
If
the ecological effects are clearly alarming, then the economic effects
are terrifying. With every change in an ecosystem, with every disruption
of natural patterns, livelihoods are affected. It is predicted that
the impacts of climate change on arable lands will result in economic
losses of some 56 billion US$, with the greatest effects in South
America, Africa and Asia. Although it has not yet been valued, sea
level rise will affect the fisheries sector because 70% of the world's
commercially fished species are dependent on estuarine or nearshore
habitats for completion of their life cycles. It is predicted that
by 2050, if present trends continue, four billion people will be
affected by water shortages. This increased use of water will be
seriously exacerbated by climate change. The costs of decreased
agricultural production, altered flows of rivers and irrigation
systems, storms that ravage coastal areas and floodplains will be
astronomical.
Kyoto
Protocol
These projected agricultural losses could increase the
percentage of hungry people in the world, while the projected impacts
of water supplies will leave 1600 million people without adequate
water by 2020.
With
the warming of the earth, mosquito species have expanded their ranges
so that mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria are spreading to
higher altitudes in Asia, Central Asia, Latin America; dengue to
Mexico; and yellow fever to Colombia. Climate change is therefore
also already affecting human health.
In
short, climate change will not only be damaging to livelihoods,
to nature, and to economic security, but will also ultimately undermine
development. It is imperative therefore, that we must know what
is being done to mitigate the impacts of climate change and how
we can adapt and live in world that will be so severely affected
by climate change.
At
the famous 'Earth Summit' held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the reality
of climate change was accepted by the environmental community. A
Framework Convention on Climate Change was drawn up by the United
Nations. Subsequently, in 1997, 180 countries signed an amendment
to this framework convention in Kyoto, Japan. Called the Kyoto Protocol,
this legally binding amendment committed 38 industrialised countries,
once they ratified the Protocol, to reduce the emissions of greenhouses
gases in the world by 5% from 2008 to 2012.
In
order to become effective, the Kyoto Protocol had to be ratified
by 55 parties to the Convention, and also by parties whose greenhouse
gas emissions accounted for 55% of the total. It took two long years
and considerable political manoeuvring for both these clauses to
be satisfied, and it finally came into effect on February 15th this
year. Sadly, but perhaps not surprisingly, given President George
Bush's environmental policies (or lack of them), the USA, the greatest
emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, has not ratified this
protocol.
Hearteningly,
some major corporations such British Petroleum among others have
already reduced their emissions. Others are manufacturing Energy
Star appliances that use less energy and therefore emit less CO2.
Climate change has been put on the agenda as a major issue of concern
in organizations such as UNEP and IUCN-The World Conservation Union.
Sadly,
even if the targets of the Kyoto Protocol are met and other companies
reduce emissions, the current trends will probably continue for
another half century, because greenhouse gases remain active in
the atmosphere for a long time.
Adapting
to climate change
What then should be the response to climate change? At
local levels, the single most important response is adjusting or
responding to climate change - i.e., adapting to climate change.
Being
prepared like the proverbial boy scouts is possibly the most important
thing we can do to deal with climate change. Comparisons show that
the impacts of the same hurricane which hit Florida and Haiti, were
felt more in Haiti because Haiti was less prepared for natural disasters.
Reacting
to an extreme weather event, as we are doing now as a response to
the Tsunami, is one thing; anticipating climate change, planning
in advance to minimise damage from an extreme weather event and
responding to it in a pre-planned manner that minimises risks is
the way forward. For example, when the National Weather Service
issues a hurricane warning in south east USA, for an entire day,
all public media stations - TV and radio - blare out a test emergency
warning signal - with clear instructions on how the real warning
would be played. All inhabitants are expected to tape their windows
to prevent glass panes from flying and causing harm if it breaks.
There are set evacuation routes and set evacuation centres which
reduce panic when the warning is given. Volunteers of essential
services are called in. As a graduate student in Florida, I have
personally experienced the effects of a clear and planned response
of an early warning system to an extreme weather event. Damage to
property may not be prevented, but certainly, human lives are saved.
We
have learned many lessons as an aftermath of the tsunami but we
need to learn to plan and be prepared for those extreme weather
events that affect us year in year out. For unlike Ruskin who said
that 'there is no such thing as bad weather', we know different.
|