Court
of Appeal steps in
ICTA barred for second time
from regional networks plan
The Information and Communication Technology Agency (ICTA), in a
continuing battle with seven telecom operators over the creation
of regional networks, was last week barred for the second time in
proceeding - on this occasion by the Court of Appeal.
The
court - in response to a petition by the seven operators - issued
an interim order against ICTA until April 29 preventing the latter
from considering or awarding any tender based on the "RFPQ"
and fixed the notice returnable date as April 28. The seven companies
are seeking writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition against
ICTA and the TRC.
Two
weeks ago the seven telecom operators - Celltel, Lanka Bell, Suntel,
SLT, Mobitel, MTN Networks (Dialog) and Hutchison Telecommunications
- won an enjoining order from the District Court preventing ICTA
from proceeding to create regional networks. The agency was accused
of usurping the powers vested with the Telecommunication Regulatory
Authority (TRC) in the provision of telecommunication licenses.
Last
Monday, the District Court extended the enjoining order till March
31, rejecting a motion by ICTA lawyer Romesh de Silva to vacate
the order. At issue is a request for Pre-Qualifications by ICTA
in connection with the proposed issue of licenses for Regional Telecommunication
Networks in the "Deep South and North East quadrants of Sri
Lanka."
The
claim of the telecom operators in Appeal Court was that ICTA was
acting contrary to the ICTA Act in that it had not followed the
due process mandated in the ICTA Act as the Task Force and the National
Committee required to be established under the ICTA Act had not
been duly constituted.
H.
L. de Silva P. C. with Avindra Rodrigo and Manoj de Silva instructed
by F. J. & G. de Saram, supporting the application made by Celltel,
Suntel and Lanka Bell, stated that the main role of ICTA is to provide
information and assistance for the formulation of the National Policy
on Information and Communication Technology and the executive agency
to assist the Task Force and the National Committee.
He
said that as the Task Force on Information and Communication Technology
has not yet been appointed by the Cabinet of Ministers, the functions
assigned to this body by Section 4 of the said Act among which is
the all important task of preparing an Action Plan have not been
performed. "In the circumstances, there is no evidence that
the proposal to establish the Regional Telecommunication Networks
in the Southern and North - East Regions of the Country has received
any consideration by such Task force in order to advise the National
Committee which is its statutory duty," counsel argued.
The
petition states that although the telecom operators are entirely
supportive of efforts to extend telecommunication networks and provide
services to rural communities and the national policy objective
to broaden the benefits of the information revolution to regional
areas that are inadequately served, they however contend that certain
mechanisms and procedures suggested in the scheme of subsidization
would be detrimental in the long term to the just and fair treatment
of service providers on a basis of equality which however are capable
of resolution and settlement through discussion and fair consideration
of representations by the telecom operators.
Mr.
De Silva also appeared for Sri Lanka Telecom, instructed by Julius
and Creasy and for Dialog, Mobitel and Hutchison with Sanjeewa Jayawardene
instructed by Sudath Perera Associates. |