'Baby
of Ranjani' is not this Ranjani's, says hospital
The battle for Galle's tsunami
baby coming to courts
By Gamini Mahadura and N.Dilshath
Banu
In what could be another Baby 81 case, a mother, who gave
birth to a child at the tsunami-hit Mahamodara Hospital in Galle
is battling to secure the custody of the child, with hospital authorities
refusing to accept the woman as the mother.
The
child was born prematurely on November 25 last year and warded at
the hospital's Premature Baby Unit. When the tsunami hit the hospital,
the baby was transferred to the Karapitiya Teaching Hospital. But
the woman, identified as S.M. Ranjani, says she lost track of the
child.
Ranjani,
who was already a mother of five, did not give up the search for
her new-born sixth. After three months of search, she said she found
the child in Ward Number 36 of the Karapitiya Teaching Hospital.
But hospital authorities dismissed her claim, saying she did not
have sufficient proof to claim the child.
Hospital
Director Dr. Shelton Perera told The Sunday Times the woman did
not have proper documents to prove her claim. "Why did she
take three months to find her baby?" he asked. However he said
the baby was registered as 'Baby of Ranjani'. "We are not sure
whether this woman is that Ranjani."
Dr.
Perera said if the woman came with necessary proof, she could get
the child. Relating her side of the story, Ranjani told The Sunday
Times: "My baby girl was born at the Mahamodara Hospital on
November 25 in Ward 27. She was born prematurely in the fifth month
of my pregnancy and kept in the Premature Baby Unit. She weighed
750 grams. On December 24, I left the hospital because I had to
take care of my other children. So I asked the Probation and Child
Care Commission (PCCC) to take care of the child temporarily. But
they could not take charge of the child because it was still being
treated at the Premature Baby Unit.
"Two
days later, the tsunami hit the hospital and the Premature Baby
Unit was destroyed."When the water level receded, I went to
the hospital and found my baby missing. No one told me about the
transfer of the child. After a three-month search, I found the baby
at the Karapitiya Hospital. She had been well looked after and she
had got new clothes too. But when I claimed that it was my baby,
the hospital authorities said that I needed to prove that the child
was mine and they refused to hand over the baby. I have appealed
to the PCCC, the Police and human rights groups to intervene and
help me get my baby back."
Meanwhile,
Galle's PCCC chief A.K.I. Amarasiri had sent a letter to the Karapitiya
Hospital director requesting him to hand over the child to the parents.
The letter states: "A probation officer had examined the child
after birth as the child was under-weight.
During
this examination, the mother had requested the PCCC to keep the
child in a children's home as she was too poor to look after the
child. The PCCC could not take the custody of the child because
she was still being treated at the Premature Baby Unit."
The
PCCC chief also says the parents of the child had produced the temporary
birth certificate issued by the hospital. However, even after the
intervention of the PCCC, the hospital authorities refused to hand
over the child. They now say they are going to courts.
In
the child's birth certificate, the name of the child has been given
as Tharushika Kumuduni and the names of the parents as Welhenega
Raja (father) and Samarakody Mudiyanselaga Ranjani (mother). The
Mahamodara Hospital has been entered as the place of birth. Mahamodara
Hospital Director Dr. Priyani Senadheera claimed the mother had
abandoned the baby after giving birth. She said the woman had come
later and collected the necessary documents but not the baby. "With
no one to take custody of the baby, we transferred the baby to Karapitiya
Hospital," she said.
Meanwhile,
on March 10 the baby was brought to the Eye Hospital in Colombo
to treat for retinal associated problem related to premature birth.
As the Eye Hospital didn't have the proper equipment to feed the
baby, the baby was transferred to the Lady Ridgeway Hospital.
Inspector
Nanayakkara of the Police Children and Womens' Bureau said moves
were under way to take the dispute to the Galle Magistrate’s
Court. The case before the judge is simple. He has to only order
a DNA test - as in the case of Baby Abilash a.k.a Baby 81 of Kalmunai
- and give a ruling based on the report. |