Avurudu
blow for Sathosa
Privatisation … restructuring … reforms – call
it what you may but the full or part sale of government assets was
once considered the panacea for poor management and curbing losses
in state organisations.
It
still is – as long as it’s properly done. The saga of
Sathosa, the ailing state-cum-private sector giant supermarket chain,
as reported on the previous page shows how a near-perfect exercise
of privatisation failed – and in this case because of the
change of governments. The chain is the retail arm of the CWE while
the wholesale section remains in full state control.
The
retail chain in which the government has a 60 percent stake while
the balance is held by a consortium (IGA) is on the verge of collapse
if the government doesn’t respond to an offer by the other
shareholders.
Sathosa
is (or has been) the people’s marketplace, as some consumers
call it, with reasonable prices catering to low-income groups and
providing a range of low-cost goods. The debt-ridden organisation
desperately needs a lifeline in the form of Rs. 300 million mainly
to fund a VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) to lay off 1,200 to
1,500 workers.
Without
this the company will sink, IGA says. Now why didn’t they
think of this, before taking over the organisation? Well, a VRS
was part of the deal between the government and IGA when the 40
percent stake was sold in end 2003. In fact the Cargills group,
the most experienced in the supermarket business here, was the first
choice in this deal until the then Trade Ministry decided –
in a subsequent addendum to the bid – to increase the number
of workers employed at Sathosa Retail. It was then that the IGA
won the tender.
Just
as the IGA, which has full management control of Sathosa, convinced
the Sathosa directorate headed then by Lal Wickrematunga to plough
in Rs 180 million as the government contribution in a rights issue,
the government changed hands in April 2004.
Still
IGA was able satisfy the new directorate chaired by Upali Gunaratne
under Minister Jeyaraj Fernandopulle on the need for the new infusion
of capital and the shedding of workers. However a few weeks after
the Gunaratne-led board agreed to the deal, government nominees
reversed their decision on the basis that the government didn’t
have the money or that it was not viable.
That’s
how it stands today – lack of new capital to turn around the
company. Last week IGA directors gave an ultimatum to the government
– either take over full management of Sathosa Retail while
IGA retains the 40 percent stake or buy back this stake and return
the more than Rs 600 million that was invested.
Fernandopulle
has said he is convinced the government can make Sathosa profitable
again and seems keen to take over management. What experience he
has in doing business, no one knows. But what is certain is that
if the government is to re-run Sathosa that would be an even bigger
disaster.
It's
clear that the biggest problem Sathosa has is excess staff and too
many loss-making outlets. Shed the fat, that’s what the IGA
wanted. Would Fernandopulle – who seems to be getting into
all kinds of problems like the tangle over Prima – shed excess
staff? It might be the reverse – more staff and hangers-on
would be brought in creating more problems.
Remember
that other supermarkets, particularly Cargills, have been giving
Sathosa a run for their money with equally, competitive pricing
and any attempt by the government to run the giant chain would be
foolish and fail miserably.
The
government can’t do business. That should be left to the private
sector.
On the other hand, industry sources say, the IGA-led management
should also share the blame for the collapse of the institution
due to a poor market mix of goods. In some faraway places, Sathosa
had products like imported cereal and a range of imported milk food
which is beyond the reach of the common man or woman. We are not
for a moment suggesting that the lower middle class or poor shouldn’t
have access to these goods but there should be some rationale in
the product mix.
When
the new managers wanted to offer a VRS and reduce staff as they
had planned soon after taking over, the company was persuaded to
delay this process as it would have been embarrassing to the government!
If this exercise was done at that time, Sathosa would probably be
in a better position to serve the people particularly during this
festive season.
While
the rich and famous stock away during Christmas with supermarkets
like Cargills and Keells Super being their hunting grounds, the
lower classes empty the shelves of Sathosa during the Sinhala and
Tamil New Year. March is normally the best month for Sathosa.
Sadly
the bells have tolled this month for the ailing giant. The die is
cast and another state institution that served the people has been
ground to the dust in a private-public experiment that turned sour.
|