Deadline
to be extended
Community Leader Awards scheme
gathers momentum
Sri Lanka's inaugural Community Leader Awards (CLAs) scheme
is gathering momentum with several inquiries being made for its
first initiative this year - selecting companies with waste management
systems that have helped in a clean environment.
"There
have been many inquiries. However, since the closing date coincides
with the long Sinhala and Tamil Hindu New Year holiday period which
could restrict interested firms from applying, the organising committee
has agreed to accommodate late entries provided a reasonable explanation
is given for the delay," a spokesperson for the organising
committee said. The closing date is April 11 but it would be extended
on a case-by-case basis for a few more days in view of the intervening
holidays. "A few more days would be given to late entries,"
the official noted.
This
innovative Corporate Social Responsibility Awards programme is aimed
at bringing the private sector and the community together in a partnership
that would steer responsible business ethics and future development
of the country. This CSR project is driven by the Chartered Institute
of Management Accountants (CIMA), Sri Lanka and The Business Club
with John Keells Holdings Limited (JKH) as the strategic partner.
This year’s awards would be presented in waste management
in three sectors - Large, Medium and Small. Manel Jayamanne, Director-General
of the Central Environment Authority (CEA) says the CEA is pleased
to be collaborating with the private sector in this exercise "This
unique award will create a demonstration-effect on the private sector",
she added. In addition to the CEA, the National Cleaner Production
Centre (NCPC) is also working with and supporting the CIMA-The Business
Club Community Awards.
The
Community Leader Awards will be an annual CSR project driven by
CIMA and The Business Club with a different theme each year where
awards would be presented to the best SriLankan corporate/company/group
in different segments. Each year companies would be recognized for
different aspects of CSR practice that affects the public. The awards
will be presented this year during the Global Leaders Summit organised
by CIMA on May 26 at the BMICH in Colombo in the presence of Dr
Mahathir Mohamed, the former Malaysian Prime Minister who is the
Summit's keynote speaker. Former Pakistani cricket superstar-turned
politician Imran Khan will also be among an array of distinguished
personalities who would address the gathering.
Applications
for entry are available at the CIMA office in Colombo or could be
downloaded from the CIMA website at www.cimaglobal.com/srilanka.
It
pays to be green - UK environment agency
Businesses and investors should be paying more attention to standards
of environmental governance if they want the best financial returns,
according to the UK Environment Agency.
In
new research on the value of corporate environmental governance,
the Agency said there is a clear link between sound environmental
governance polices, practices and performance and the financial
performance of businesses.
The
research, carried out for the Environment Agency by Innovest Strategic
Value Advisors, provides strong evidence of higher financial returns,
business opportunity and competitive advantage, with differences
in financial performance between environmental leaders and laggards
being quite marked.
Fifteen
case studies covering funds, sectors and individual companies are
detailed in the report, alongside the findings of a literature review
in which 85% of published studies assessed showed a positive correlation
between environmental governance and/or events and financial performance.
The
case studies confirm the findings of the literature review, in that
changes in financial performance stemming from environmental governance
measures can be demonstrated and quantified, although the extent
to which these change are due entirely to environmental governance
issues is not always clear.
Findings
of specific case studies showed that UK based Jupiter Ecology Fund
has been an impressive performer, giving a consistently better investment
return over five years than the Standard and Poor Global Growth
Sector average. The US based Winslow Green Growth Fund consistently
out-performed its benchmark over a prolonged period.
Forest
and paper product companies with above average environmental governance
standards and above average environmental track records financially
out-performed companies with below average ratings.
Company
case studies showed how environmental management in areas such as
risk reduction and pollution control can reduce direct costs and
create savings. One area where links can be more clearly established
is that of operational impact.
US
biotech company Baxter International, for example, uses systematic
monitoring, recording and target setting to reduce environmental
risks to business. These improvements saved the company US$12.7
million in 2002, with cost avoidance at US$52 million.
Baxter's
efforts have resulted in a significant reduction of operating costs.
In total, environmental efforts saved the company US$65 million
in 2002. At 3M, global fines for the company were US$85,000 in 1998
compared to US$253,000 in 1990, and the share price has grown steadily
since the company introduced its environmental programme.
The
cost of an eco-efficiency initiative and its financial outcomes
can be measured fairly precisely when a company sets up the appropriate
environmental accounting procedures.
In
the case of 3M and Baxter International, where the impacts could
be examined over a sustained period, it was revealed that a long-term
environmental governance strategy could yield a continuing financial
benefit.
Howard
Pearce, Head of Environmental Finance and Pension Fund Management
for the Environment Agency, said:
"The
Environment Agency commissioned this report to shed light on the
value of good environmental governance from a business and investor
perspective, and thereby encourage more widespread adoption of sound
environmental polices, practices and lead to improved environmental
and financial performance.
The
findings clearly support the view that companies which reduce their
environmental risks and impacts are more sustainable, profitable,
valuable and competitive." |