Pasta
distributor could face charges under Food Act
The distributor of what was thought to have been 'pet food ' given
to tsunami victims in the Hambantota district last month, could
be charged with violating the labelling regulations of the country,
a Sri Lanka Standards Institution (SLSI) official said.
Director
S.L. Ginige told The Sunday Times that all foodstuffs must clearly
indicate what kind of food is contained inside the tins or packs.
In this case, thousands of tins with labels containing pictures
of cats and dogs were distributed to tsunami victims, many of whom
fell sick soon after consuming the contents.
The
tins had a date printed on them, but it did not specifically mention
whether it was the expiry date of the food as is required under
the Food Act regulations. The import or distribution of food violating
such regulations was a punishable offence.
A
non-governmental relief organisation helping tsunami victims last
month distributed thousands of tins, imported from Britain, and
reportedly containing pasta, but the label on the tins carried figures
of pets. Officials of the organisation claim the people may have
fallen sick because the pasta was probably not cooked according
to the directions contained on the tins.
Public
Health Inspectors in the Hambantota area seized some 46,000 tins
after the tsunami victims fell sick, and appealed to the public
not to consume any more of their contents until an investigation
was conducted into the matter.
Samples
have been sent to the Medical Research institute (MRI) by the Director
of Health Services for the Hambantota district, Dr.S.A.H. Liyanage.
nearly four weeks after the incidents took place.
"
We are still awaiting the MRI report to complete our investigations.
The PHIs acted following complaints by tsunami victims that they
began vomiting soon after consuming the food. They had thought they
had consumed pet food. Some of them also showed signs of allergy
", he said.
Meanwhile
the organisation involved in the distribution of the food has requested
Dr. Liyanage to issue a certificate that the food was not meant
for pets, but meant for human consumption.
The
relief organisation known as the Islamic Relief Committee (ISRC)
has claimed it had received a letter from the manufacturers in the
UK that the food was fit for human consumption.
ISRC
General Secretary Hasanar Mohamed Mihlar said the PHIs had 'mistaken'
the food for pet food after seeing the labels on the tins. The ISRC,
a sister concern of Muslim Hands in Nottingham, UK, had also been
part of a fund-raising campaign for the UK based Royal Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA), whose logo with cats
and dogs is carried on the labels of the tins, confusing the issue
still further. |