JVP
chip chip Cooray
By Our Political Editor
The Governor of the Western Province,
veteran trade unionist Alavi Moulana, busy as he was with preparations
for the May Day rally of his party, received a Presidential decree
on Monday night: "Prorogue the Western Provincial Council".
The prorogation was to be for three weeks until such time as a special
team appointed by the President went into the allegations in a no-confidence
motion against Chief Minister Reginald Cooray.
The
real reason that every body knows; President Chandrika Kumaratunga
was unable to ensure that the besieged Chief Minister would survive.
The move was, for all intents and purposes what one can call, dictatorial.
It was the hand of Esau (Moulana), but the voice of Jacob (Kumaratunga).
One
more feather to the cap of the President following the grabbing
of the three ministries under the UNF regime in 2003; and the dissolution
of Parliament in 2004 despite a solemn promise to the Speaker that
she would not do so. And so, it was from the ridiculous to the sublime
when, hardly had the ink dried proroguing the Western Provincial
Council that President Kumaratunga accepted an award from Sri Lanka
Institute of Marketing at a ceremony at the President's House on
Wednesday morning -- an Icon Award no less, for the glorious title
"The leader with the best Sri Lankan values". There was
no one in the grand Presidential hall, or outside, who would argue
the point that the Icon Award together with its citation was most
apt.
But
for both President Kumaratunga and Chief Minister Cooray, the political
fall out from their failure to face a vote of no-confidence motion
was embarassing, to say the least. The last time, the President
did something like this was in 2001, when, again her parliamentary
team was faced with a vote of no-confidence, she prorogued Parliament,
and eventually went to the polls. There was no other way out for
her. Eventually, she lost the elections that December 2001.
The
issue was important enough for her to suddenly cut short her already
extended spring vacation in Britain and France. She must have been
seething with anger that her junior coalition partner, the JVP,
was obstinate to a point of stubborn resistance not to bail her
Chief Minister out of the bog he had got into. And couldn't the
JVP at least have made her sacrifice to return from a UK holiday,
worthwhile. Her discussions with the JVP on Monday night (the night
of her return) was a waste of her time, as far as she was concerned.
The JVP was not budging from its position -- that Reginald Cooray
had to go. Starting from about August last year, at joint PA-JVP
(UPFA) Operations Committee meetings, the JVP has been badgering
the PA Chief Minister about his handling of the country's largest
Provincial Council. Mind you, Cooray also holds the job as Minister
of - catch your breath - Finance, Planning, Law and Order, Local
Government, Provincial Administration, Education, Transport, Employment,
Cultural and Art Affairs.
The
holder of a Bachelor's degree, of all subjects, in Public Administration
from the University of Sri Jayawardhanapura, that hot-bed of radical
student political activism in the 1960s and early 1970s, Cooray
seemed unable to put theory into practice at the Western Provincial
Council. The administration of the council was running to the ground,
and even the SLFPers in the council were getting disgusted. Some
15 councillors formed themselves into a 'ginger group', the traditional
name given to backbenchers from a ruling party.
As
the Chief Minister began avoiding the unpleasant meetings of the
operations committee, the JVP then began raising issues at the UPFA
group meetings, and the finance committee meetings of the council,
which was a virtual mandatory requrement for the Chief Minister
to attend. The Chief Minister found the finance committee meetings
also uncomfortable, as the criticism against him overflowed into
the debate arena of the council sessions themselves.
As
the confrontation was coming to a head by the end of last year,
the JVP sent a signal to the UPFA (PA) joint secretary Susil Premajayantha,
and also to President Kumaratunga, that they were finding it difficult
to work with Cooray. On April 6 this year, the main opposition UNP
struck. Clearly seeing JVP bitterness towards the Chief Minister,
and increasing discomfiture on the part of the Chief Minister to
meet the arguments stacked against him, the UNP, whom everyone thought
was fast asleep, activated itself in the council and presented a
no-confidence motion against Cooray, the Chief Minister. But they
miscalculated the implementation of the motion. The UNP felt that
it was best to strike with the speed of greased lightening taking
even some of its own members unawares. It called for a vote that
very day - and lost the vote. That was an ill-conceived, spur of
the moment motion.
Later,
a properly drafted motion was presented. Proposed by the Chief Opposition
Whip Lakshman Abeygoonaratne and members Douglas Fernando and George
Perera with 11 charges against the Chief Minister, it was tabled
in the council, and got into its Order Paper. The motion was then
to be taken up on April 26 (last Tuesday) in terms of Rules 35,
55 (1), 55 (3), 55 (5) and 64 (2) of the council's Standing Orders.
The
motion contained the following accusations against the Chief Minister;
That he violated Acts and Statutes
That he deprived an opportunity for disposing of garbage by requesting
a commission of Rs. 5 million for the electricity generating project
undertaken by a British company, Plant Advantage Ltd.,
That he requested a commission of Rs. 5 million from the Burns Institution
at Orugodawatte in order to stop future activities of an American
Company, Selina, from engaging in garbage disposing.
That
he sold a permit for Rs. 2.5 million and entered into some agreement
with the Western Province Transit Passenger Transport Authority
That he violated the provisions of the circular pertaining to the
recruitment of personal staff provided to a Minister and exceeding
the number, by the appointment of under qualified persons and thereby
causing the misuse of funds for the payment of salaries.
That
he misused council funds by permitting an officer of the personal
staff to obtain a monthly allowance of Rs. 10,000 and permitting
him to use the Chief Minister's security vehicle and fuel for the
vehicle.
That he allowed the work of the council to break down by wrongfully
advising the Governor to remove officers attached to the Provincial
Public Service, without any reasonable and justifiable cause, to
achieve narrow political objectives resulting in over 100 posts
of the council falling vacant.
That
he directed the affairs of the Ministry of Co-operatives and Highways,
which is not assigned to him, by not allowing the appointment of
an officer to the office of the secretary of this ministry, and
for the appointment of a secretary to his Ministry as acting secretary.
That he caused the breakdown of the administrative system of the
Education Department.
That he has committed an offence punishable by courts by violating
the 17th Amendment.
Ex-facie,
these looked very serious accusations against the Chief Minister,
the worst among them, the charges relating to corruption.
The composition of the Western Provincial Council stands as follows;
UNP 39 seats, SLFP 36, JVP 23, SLMC 4, DUA 1 and WPP 1.
Crunch time came for the Chief Minister when the JVP decided that
it would either support the no-confidence motion or refrain from
voting, either way giving the opposition UNP a victory. Many political
analysts believe that the animosity between Cooray and the JVP stems
from electoral politics and differences in the Kalutara district
-- Cooray's one-time constituency, and a JVP stronghold.
Others
believe that if that is deep-rooted, there was also a deep-seated
row. The JVP was sending a clear, resounding message to the President
and her PA: "You guys are there because of us, and with our
support. Let this be a lesson. Without our support, you folks are
nobodies".
With
the writing on the wall, the Chief Minister said he would quit --
and ask the Governor Moulana to call for fresh elections. In London,
the President was enjoying the British spring while her subjects
were sweating it out in the miserable April heat. But the political
heat wave did hit the President as well, and despite repeated postponements
for her return, she decided to pack her bags and return home. She
called for an emergency meeting with the JVP leadership, which told
her that they must get the ratification from the party's decision-making
politburo on the matter.
But
the politburo was in no mood to compromise. The JVP's decision remained
the same. It either abstains, or votes for the UNP sponsored motion.
It made it a point to tell the President, and the PA that the decision
was not aimed at rocking the UPFA coalition, but was aimed against
a single individual, viz., Reginald Cooray.
The
President was not going to chance a defeat of her party on the eve
of a possible Presidential election or a referendum on Constitutional
amendments, or whatever is in her mind or not in her mind.
That
Tuesday morning, Governor Moulana gazetted the order for the prorogation
of the Western Provincial Council and appointing a two-member committee
headed by a former Court of Appeal judge, Chandradasda Nanayakkara,
to inquire into the allegations made in the no-confidence motion.
But,
the low interest among the public in the political affairs of provincial
politics was seen when the events relating to the prorogation were
eclipsed by the brutal abduction and assassination of a Tamil political
commentator two days later.
Dharmaretnam
Sivaram was to leave for Battitcoloa on Friday night. There was
no question about his arrangements; in fact, he had made arrangements
with one of our Deputy Editors, Rajpal Abeynayake, to meet in Batticaloa
on Monday. He promised to pick up our staffer in Batticoaloa, and
promised to call him Sunday night to ascertain time and place for
pickup.
Did
the assailants know that Sivaram was leaving for Batticaloa -- and
was that why they got to him earlier?
There are many more questions than answers.
Sivaram was not a person who frequented the Bamabalapitya Restaurant,
which serves only beer and foreign liquor, kinds of beverages that
he did not have a particular partiality for.
More than obviously, somebody was tailing him.
Some
asked whether he was a journalist or an LTTE operative, considering
particularly that the LTTE has decided to give him its highest award
posthumously. One can possibly say he didn't ask for the award --
he cannot be blamed for whatever the LTTE bestows on him particularly
after he is dead. No doubt he had immense clout - his initiatives
got Jeyanandamoorthy, a photojournalist appointed as MP on the TNA
ticket approved by the LTTE. He was the General Secretary of the
PLOTE, leaving the organisation after the Indo Lanka accord was
signed - in fact before that - and PLOTE had fallen foul of the
LTTE much earlier. But he allied himself to the LTTE, and started
Tamilnet with some Diaspora help, and the LTTE relied on Tamilnet
for the dissemination of most of its information. But Tamilnet carried
an exhortation every day about press freedom and the value of freedom
of expression -- because the LTTE --- particularly Dr. Anton Balasingham
at one point, didn't seem to like what he wrote either. So he was
an independent man - a little known thing -- and there cannot be
such a thing as an independent terrorist, can there? (The exhortations
on press freedom were meant for Balasingham and the LTTE.)
The
anti-government elements are pointing the finger at the JVP, saying
that the hate speak and the anti Ram article in the JVP newspaper
Lanka points to a JVP hand. But facts seem to indicate that this
is political persecution of the Patriotic National Movement and
the allied JVP, more than anything else. His abductors, according
to witnesses, spoke Tamil anyway, and there are many who do not
doubt that he was under threat from the Karuna or the Karuna and
allied groups.
Was
Sivaram assaulted, or tortured before he was assassinated? Police
say the body was discovered by the mobile patrol at Talangama at
12.30 am hardly any time for any kind of coercive tactics to obtain
information. (He was abducted around 10.30 pm.)
Whodunit
then, the government Karuna faction or the military acting on its
own? Was it retaliation for the kidnapping of counter terrorism
Inspector Jeyaratnam?
What
will be the fallout of the killing - - will the LTTE ratchet up
its spree of assassinations (and Karuna his?) and will the government
face enormous embarrassment at the aid group meeting in view of
the developing international pressure by media activists who say
the government has not done anything for protection of journalists? |