Lessons
to learn from Bangladesh
By S.R. Pathiravithana
It was not even a week ago when Sri Lanka's former
captain Arjuna Ranatunge went on record saying it is not very far
away that the day will dawn when Sri Lanka starts losing to lesser
rung nations in the Test arena.
Whether
it is a prelude of things to come one does not know, but, last Sunday
the first nail in the coffin seemingly was driven in when the Sri
Lanka under - 15 team lost to Bangladesh in the final of a Tri-nation
cricket series also involving Malaysia. Mind you! Adding to the
woes of cricket in our island, the debacle took place on our own
soil.
The
story goes on to say the Bangladesh under - 15 team batting first
ran up a score of 237 all out in 43.1 overs with half centuries
coming off the bats of two of their youngsters. When it came to
Lanka's turn the home team toiled for 42.1 overs to score just a
paltry 128 all out with the Bangladesh skipper Humayon Kabir capturing
5 for 33 with his leg spinners.
This
is no matter to laugh off or to consider a mere passing occurrence.
This is a case of high concern with the roots running very deep
into the very structure of the game we love so much.
The
very first question that comes to mind is that who is responsible
for this unforgivable situation? It is an easy answer -- The Sri
Lanka Schools Cricket Association! Why? Because they are the custodians
of the local cradle of the game and are responsible for all junior
cricket played within the schools sphere (barring international
schools) in the island.
As
a result it was they who were responsible for the selection panel
which finally selected the team of schoolsboys under the Sri Lanka
banner. It is a fact that Sri Lanka at present lies second in the
ODI rankings and fifth in Test rankings at the highest grade and
when a fledgling team of this nature performs badly it does not
augur well for the future of the game.
The
local under-15 selection panel names read as Gamini Weerawansa,
Saman Hewavitharana, K.N.S. Kasturi, Sujeewa Perera and Prasanna
Mohotti. Hmmmm... as I far as I know none of the names ring a bell
neither in the exploits of the game in the middle nor as suitable
material to give the final verdict on a side which is to represent
the country in sport at any given level. The report that has cascaded
here is that they are mere masters in charge of cricket in schools
and by reason of that fact they hold positions in the SLSCA. Is
this a criteria to become a member of a selection panel for a team
that is to represent the country? Holding positions in that association
may be their right. But, if you get them to select a cricket team
at any level to represent the country it looks akin to Tom and Jerry
given the task of selecting the post of Walt Disney Corporation
CEO.
This
is not all. There are other pointing of fingers too. The age group
limits keep on changing like changing your garments. Why? Some say
they happen to please certain individuals who are influential. They
must not confuse matters as they are handling young minds which
are not corrupt and they cannot comprehend as to why the age limit
changed and they had to stay at the dressing room for yet another
year while it was their turn to play.
It
is a well known fact that during the last two decades or so, after
the period of the late Prince of Wales stalwart B.A. Mendis, it
was B.S. Perera who ran the affairs of the SLSCA for over 17 years
as the secretary of the Association and it was a one party government
like in Cuba. But there was one difference here. Here the heads
( who were school principals) kept on changing from time to time
but the rest of the bandwagon kept on batting may be with minor
changes.
The
expansion of the SLSCA began under the secretaryship of B.S. Perera
and a few others like Frank Cooray etc. To give them due credit
they did a lot of good deeds for the game by taking it far and wide
in to the countryside and thus encouraging the unsung village lads
to don pads and show their prowess. However when things went on
for too long, the avenues for new thinking was nullified and school
cricket seemingly started getting stale. The standards dropped.
The spectators who thronged to watch the matches faded off and at
present even a high octane match between two top Colombo schools
could muster only a handful of people.
In
short when things tend to get stale a lot of people start losing
real interest and the whole endeavour fizzles out. At this point
square plugs start trying to get into round holes which should never
happen. Then final result becomes one big jumble. |