Obeysekera
deed forgery case
Blatant differences in signatures,
confirms handwriting expert
By Teles Anandappa
The Indian handwriting and forensic expert giving evidence in a
case of forgery stated in the Colombo High Court this week that
he had scrutinised the questioned documents and compared them with
the original signatures from 1987-2001 of the late Frederick Obeysekera
and found ‘blatant differences’.
He
said he could not find any developing changes in the forged documents
to show that the signatory was suffering from Parkinson's disease.
Prof. P. Chandra Sekharan was giving evidence, led by Senior State
Counsel S. Thurairajah before High Court Judge Ms. Rohini Perera
on the forged deeds relating to Mr. Obeysekera's property.
He
confirmed that there were blatant differences in the two sets of
documents he examined. In this case former BASL secretary Bandula
Wijesingha, former Military spokesman Sumedha Perera and former
caretaker of the property Sarath Wijewardena are indicted with claiming
the land and ancestral home of Mr. Obeysekera through forged documents.
They
are charged with fraudulently certifying a forged document and making
a forged deed as a deed of gift for the land and property in Rajagiriya
of Frederick Obeysekera, on or around June 11, 2001 and with aiding
and abetting the said offence.
Prof.
Chandra Sekharan further stated that after thoroughly examining
55 sample signatures it clearly showed that there were indications
of progressive signs of a Parkinsonian.
He
said due to Mr. Obeysekera's illness and age the fluency, tremulousness
and shakiness of his signature was a clear sign of Parkinson's.
In the latter stages of his life the word and individual letter
alignment was missing in his writing, the witness said.
His
observation was that the person who forged the signature had not
been able to co-ordinate with the muscular movements of the original
signature when he signed the forged deeds. Also the forged deeds
were made using previous signatures of the late Mr. Obeysekera as
a model. These forgeries were done without understanding certain
features of his later handwriting.
The
forger could not co-ordinate with the mind, muscle and nerve process
of the original writing of Mr. Obeysekera when he made the forged
document. Prof. Sekharan said the forged signatures were like a
twenty-five-year-old woman standing amidst seventy-five-year-old
women. Further hearing was postponed for May 25. |