Right 
              of reply 
                
              Dear Editor,  
              I write with reference to the column written by your Political Editor 
              in The Sunday Times of 15th May.  
             The 
              assumption that the occasion described in the political column was 
              the nomination of Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Presidential candidate 
              is incorrect. The United National party nominated Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe 
              as the Presidential candidate at the 50th National Convention of 
              the Party held on 5th December 2004. His acceptance speech was made 
              on that occasion.  
             The 
              event referred to by the Political Editor is the launch of the Party's 
              propaganda campaign. A factual report of this is given in page 3 
              of The Sunday Times of 15th May. The key speaker on that occasion, 
              Mr. Hemakumara Nanayakkara spoke after the Leader of the Party - 
              Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe.  
             Your 
              columnists live happily with contradictions. On the one hand your 
              political column has criticised the UNP for not observing tradition, 
              including traditional Buddhist rites and ceremonials. On the other 
              hand another column in your newspaper has criticised the Leader 
              of the UNP and Leader of the Opposition for following Buddhist rites 
              at the launch of his book, Deshapalanaya saha Dharmaya.  
             It 
              appears that Buddhism to Rajpal Abeynayake, is like a red flag to 
              a bull. He is of the view that Buddhism is fundamental and full 
              of extreme positions thereby making impossible a pluralistic society 
              in our country. We do not share the anti-Buddhist view of your columnist. 
              The teachings of the Buddha are based on ahimsa, compassion, tolerance 
              and respect. That is why it is possible for Buddhists to treat all 
              other religions with respect and with tolerance, leading to co-existence 
              among adherents of all religions. The Asokan Empire is a good example 
              of such a pluralistic society. The UNP, following this example, 
              has since inception upheld the freedom of religious worship and 
              observance.  
             We 
              have no wish to weary your readers by engaging in a long controversy 
              on Buddhism through the columns of your newspaper. We offer the 
              following quote from the Dhammapada for reflection.  
              Digha jagarato ratti - digham santassa yojanam  
              Digho balanam samsaro - saddhammam avijanatnam  
              Long is the night to the sleepless; long is the mile to the tired; 
              and long is samsara to the witless who knows not the sublime teachings. 
               
              Tissa Attanayake  
              Asst. General Secretary  
              United National Party  
             Our 
              Political Editor says:  
               We note a sudden flush of spirituality pervading the UNP. 
              It possibly has something to do with the Vesak atmosphere, or the 
              party leader's release of his book 'Politics and the Dhamma' this 
              week. Maybe they are working towards a Dharmishta Rajya which could 
              not be fully implemented from 1977-89.  
              We wish them the best, considering the fact that they need to retrieve 
              a lot of lost Buddhist votes in recent years, if they are to regain 
              office. 
             Meanwhile, 
              Rajpal Abeynayake says:  
               I did speak of Mr Wickremesinghe doing the bull Clinton. 
              Attanayake seems to have put the hat on - he is getting pretty bovine 
              in his reply, saying also that to me Buddhism is like a red flag 
              to a bull. I didn't have to be given an Attanayake sermon this Vesak 
              - having imbued Buddhism from the written discourses of the great 
              Teacher himself. He says I'm of the view that "Buddhism is 
              fundamental and full of extreme positions thereby making impossible 
              a pluralistic society in our country. 
             '' 
              If Attanayake is going to put such hilariously facetious and untrue 
              words that only he can dream-up in my mouth, I suggest that he takes 
              over and writes my column in future. All I wrote was, "instead 
              of capitalizing on the pluralistic Sri Lankan identity Ranil Wickremesinghe 
              is trying to wear a nationalist hat.'' Nationalist here refers to 
              being politically Buddhist a la UNP; not being Buddhist per the 
              Buddha. Anyhow, Attanayake is obviously not writing on my article, 
              he is merely hallucinating about it. He says: "another columnist 
              (me) in your newspaper has criticized the Leader of the Opposition 
              for following Buddhist rites at the launch of his book Deshapalanaya 
              saha dharmaya.''  
             I 
              wrote my column on Sunday. The book launch took place on Monday. 
              Attanayake's political Buddhism is so zealous, he seems to exist 
              in a time and space of his own.  |