UNP
on P-TOMS: Where is Sinhala representation?
The United National Party (UNP) said clear provision should be made
for the representation of the Sinhalese Community in the Post Tsunami
Operational Management Structure (P-TOMS) and that the present constitution
of the Committees in the structure was unacceptable.
“Since
the Government is not obliged to nominate a member of the Sinhalese
community to the high level committee, there could well be a situation
in which the Sinhalese community goes unrepresented. We think this
is unacceptable,” the UNP said in a statement by party spokesman
G.L. Peiris.
The problem is even more acute in respect of the composition of
the Regional Committee where the principle relating to objection
by a dissenting minority could lead to the exclusion of Sinhalese
representation,” he said.
The
UNP said there was an anomaly with regard to the composition of
the Regional Committee as envisaged by section 6 of the document.
Section 6 (c) makes it clear that the Chairperson of the Regional
committee will be a member of the LTTE, while the Deputy Chairpersons
are nominees of the government of Sri Lanka and the Muslim parties.
As in previous agreements, provision should be made for representatives
to be nominated by the Government of Sri Lanka but not to function
as Deputy Chairmen. The latter provision entails an unacceptable
relegation of the status of the government of Sri Lanka.
Prof.
Peiris said the territorial areas within which the P-TOMS agreement
was to operate were enveloped in some degree of doubt and this was
attributable to the wording used in Section 2 of the document entitled
“Scope”. He said “Section 2(b) declares that “The
Tsunami Disaster Zone (the TDZ) shall be defined as an area affected
by the tsunami.” This is followed immediately by Section 2
(c) with the provision that the TDZ shall include all that tsunami
affected land area of Sri Lanka which is adjacent to the sea lying
within a limit of 2 kilometres landwards from the mean low water
line. This is an inclusive, as distinguished from an exhaustive
definition. It would therefore seem that the TDZ could, in keeping
with the definition embedded in this document extend beyond the
limit of 2 kilometres. This requires clarification.
There
is no scope accorded in the document to the principle of subsidiary
which in our opinion is critical for good governance. The thinking
of the UNP in respect of all aspects of delivery of tsunami relief
and indeed the ramifications of the larger peace process entails
a sharp focus on the responsibilities of local government authorities,
operating as they do in close proximity to the needs and aspirations
of the people of the affected areas. The omission in this regard
prevents grass roots participation in the making and implementing
of decisions. This cannot but affect adversely the practical functioning
of the mechanism.
“In
our view, a material omission in the document consists of the absence
of any reference to the “Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement”
( also known as the Deng principles) This forms an essential part
of the core principles applicable to the functions of the structures
established by the document and the deletion of these principles
therefore constitutes a significant deficiency”.
Prof Peiris said with the establishment of the structure contained
in the P-Toms document TAFREN becomes superfluous.
“We’re
not convinced that in view of the supervening changes effected by
this document, there is any longer adequate justification for incurring
the substantial overhead expenses of TAFREN”, he said. |