The
changing phases in the game of cricket
By Ranil Abeynaike
Cricket was a sport played at quite a leisurely pace with the traditionally
accepted feature being strongly valued and guarded. Cricket was
different to other sports by the manner in the way it was played,
the way it was followed and the way it was publicized.
The
final quarter of the twentieth saw the world change in tremendous
proportions and that way of life continues. Slowly but surely that
has been the way with cricket too. It was the 1975 World Cup, the
inaugural event that initially prompted change. For the first time,
obviously unintentionally, the game captured the image of the world.
This
drew the attention of the media. One media magnate – Kerry
Packer – revolutionized the sport. He challenged the establishment
and pretty successfully too. With his involvement beginning in 1977,
players embarked on full time professional careers. His lead was
followed by every nation playing national cricket.
It
also meant that those associated with the game also began to benefit.
Umpires, Coaches, Scorers, Statisticians, Trainers, Physios, Dieticians,
the list goes on and on. A string of changes, basically aimed at
developing the game.
This also meant more and more money being pumped into the game.
It is human nature for many to become greedy when the “carrot”
is held aloft. It led to the most damaging scandal involving the
game ever. The match fixing scandal surfaced. Some were punished,
proved guilty but undoubtedly many got away scot-free. It is ridiculous
to even imagine that it was less than a handful who were involved
in such a major racket.
The
game has followed the path of human evolution. Now the search goes
on for constant change to make this sport once known as a “gentleman’s
game”, to a highly marketable commodity.
Twenty-twenty
cricket, substitutions in one day games and games involving mixed
teams being classified as internationals, being the latest development.
Of the three twenty-twenty cricket has been accepted but not given
too much prominence and that is the way it must stay. Only as a
form of occasional entertainment and not part of the regular curriculum.
A major
drawback in one day cricket is the lack of sufficient close finishes.
More often than not the game is decided by the half way stage. Should
substitutions resolve that situation, then it is a move in the correct
direction. It no doubt adds to the batting and bowling strength
and the captain has an additional card to play with, when he is
in trouble.
The
number of games involving mixed teams, invited to play for charities
and other fund raising projects are on the increase. Crowds flock
in to witness many stars who assemble to perform at one venue. These
games must be curtailed. The reasons may be worthwhile but it should
not be overdone. Changes are important, but they must be monitored
to ensure they are all result oriented.
|