Economy
sacrificed on the political altar
The rest of this year would be an electioneering year. Irrespective
of whether we have an election, or two, or no election at all, the
preoccupation of the country would be the impending elections.
And
electioneering years are bad news for the economy. Worse still elections
have been so frequent that the economy has to perform during a quick
succession of electioneering years. The run up to the elections,
the election period itself and until the government is formed or
a new President is installed is a long period of listlessness in
the administration. What can be even worse is the bad decision making
in the run up period to the elections. It is a time for truckling
to the masses when the economic decisions taken could be harmful
to the economy in the long run.
The
elections and the uncertainties created by them dampen investment,
both foreign and local. Much needed reform measures are shelved
and public investment on infrastructure projects get postponed and
implementation of public sector projects become tardy. All these
imply that we will continue to remain a modest growth economy unable
to make the needed spurt to rapid growth. The fear that Finance
Minister Dr. Sarath Amunugama expressed not so long ago that Sri
Lanka may be left lagging behind other Asian economies is unfortunately
the unfolding scenario.
In
spite of this, the first half of this year's economic performance
has been reasonably good and the hope is that whatever happens during
the next five months the economy would be able to continue its upward
march. The country's agricultural and industrial performance is
indeed encouraging. Both tea and paddy production are heading to
a new record high.
In
the first half of the year tea production increased by 7 percent
to 165.8 million kilograms. It is likely that tea production this
year would surpass the record harvest of 310 million kilograms in
2002.The Maha paddy production reached a new high and it is most
likely that the Yala harvest too would be good. This year's paddy
production should ensure that the total needs of rice are met by
domestic production. Coconut and Rubber production has not fared
as well, but their decline is of lesser consequence.
Industrial
production and exports continue to increase by about 11 per cent.
Our main export, garments has shown resilience in spite of the withdrawal
of the multi fibre agreement. Although the growth rate of garments
exports is more modest at 9 per cent, it is indicative of the industry's
resilience in the face of severe global competition.
The
exports of garments have continued to rise indicating an adaptation
to the new global environment. There has also been good news that
the country has been able to obtain favoured treatment from EU countries.
Other industrial exports have also grown and the prospect of a wide
variety of other industrial exports increasing is good for the diversification
of the country's export structure. Rubber and leather goods exports
have increased by around 25 per cent and earned US$ 204 million.
This is nearly one half the value of all agricultural exports.
The
buoyancy of the Colombo Stock Market is almost surprising in the
political context outlined earlier. One is inclined to believe that
the business community is ignoring the political developments and
taking the view that whatever happens there would be possibilities
for investment and economic growth. They may be even of the view
that a change of government may usher in a better period for investment
and economic growth. Whatever the basis of investor- attitude, this
optimism is a saving grace for the economy, as many of the negative
factors outlined earlier are somewhat mitigated.
Economic
prospects in the long run are a different matter. The uncertainty
could have serious consequences for economic policy. The government
could once again compromise with other parties on economic policy
measures, as well as other policies that would have an adverse impact
on the economy. It is also likely that the government would give
into trade union and other political pressure and take decisions
that would have disadvantageous consequences on the economy.
Demands
for higher wages, recruitment of unwanted employees into the government
or public corporations, expenditure that are politically beneficial
and economically detrimental, are very much on the cards in this
electioneering context. Fiscal extravagance is most likely in the
coming months. Increased welfare expenditure and salaries are likely
to increase the budget deficit to an extent that destabilises the
economy further. The consequent inflationary pressures would require
the Central Bank to take counter measures to contain the adverse
effects of the government's fiscal over-spending. Raising interest
rates are a policy response to this. The rise in interest rates
in turn could have adverse effects on investment and corporate performance.
It
is inevitable that the political uncertainty generates adverse macro
economic conditions that undermine economic fundamentals. These
adverse economic fundamentals would affect economic growth in diverse
ways: rising prices, depreciation of the currency and high taxation.
The inflationary pressures would induce strikes and possibly increases
in wages. The economic reforms that were on the cards would be deferred,
while other changes that would affect the economy adversely in the
long run may be implemented.
The
political context in which the economy has to operate is undoubtedly
the biggest constraint to economic growth. Higher economic growth
and resolution of economic and social problems will continue to
be a dream, until the political and constitutional state of affairs
is changed. The economy can hardly be expected to perform at its
full potential in this environment. Nevertheless in the intervening
time the unstable and uncertain environment has to be accepted and
the economy must perform to its best under such conditions. Long
term economic growth and development continue to be sacrificed in
this political environment.
|