London
terror attacks: When will they ever learn?
“Black September” and “Black Friday” are
names given to tragic and horrific events in the history of conflict
and terrorism. They are peculiar to the Arab world.
Now
Britain has its own “Black Thursday” after the first
ever suicide bombings in Western Europe on July 7. Two weeks later
an abortive attempt was made to repeat the tragic happenings of
that day.
Thursday has now been etched in the psyche of the British people,
particularly the security establishment.
So
last Thursday London was again overwhelmed with a heavy security
presence. Armed police and special forces personnel prowled the
streets and train stations looking for potential suicide bombers,
occasionally stopping Asian youth or searching their bags.
If
such a heavy security presence is intended to assure the public
that the state is bent on protecting them, it will not be much of
an assurance if this is to happen only on Thursdays.
It
would be puerile to believe that suicide bombers operate only on
Thursdays and lie low the rest of the week preparing themselves
for martyrdom.
Those
who use mobile-phone technology and other accoutrement of modern
science are surely not that foolish to confine terrorism to a particular
day of the week.
Since
mobilising and employing such a huge security force costs something
like £45 million a day, it is hardly likely that the government
will keep this up indefinitely.
Besides
the enormous cost, it drains the resources of surrounding areas
from which personnel are drawn to protect Londoners. So any terrorist
planner and suicide bomber worth his martyrdom would target an area
outside London –perhaps a tourist area such as Brighton or
Blackpool — or bide their time until the security alert is
lowered and life returns to something like what it used to be.
So
this highly visible security presence that resulted in the killing
of an innocent young Brazilian said to be by specially-deployed
armed forces men and not by police, is only temporary and a gesture
more than anything else.
I
suppose politicians here speak and write nearly as much rubbish
as our own kind, though those here are, by and large, more morally
upright than some of them over there.
Last
year the Blair government was trying to justify the issue of national
identity cards to those living in Britain. One of the forceful arguments
adduced by government was that this would help fight terrorism.
When it was pointed out that though Spain issues identity cards
that did not stop the Madrid train bombings, Blair and ministers
pooh-poohed the argument.
Despite
the earlier criticism, the government has not dropped the idea and
any legislation might have easier passage now. But what is interesting
is that it is now admitted it would not have stopped the suicide
bombings here.
Of
course it would not have. Identity cards might have helped trace
individuals like the documents found at the scenes of the bombings
and mobile phone calls helped trace them. But that was post-facto.
Earlier Prime Minister Blair and his clique blamed Al Qaeda for
the terrorism in Iraq and elsewhere. Osama bin Laden was the new
Satan Bush and Blair were warring against.
Last
Thursday, bin Laden’s deputy Ayman Al Zawahiri issued a video
clip in which he promised more mayhem in Britain and the US. Having
earlier blamed Al Qaeda for everything including the bad weather,
now it is claimed that Al Qaeda is trying to cash in on the terrorist
handiwork of others.
The
great Indian chief Geronimo was correct — white man does speak
with forked tongue. And how forked it is we should see before long
when several new anti-terrorism laws are introduced before the year
is out.
Among them is legislation to stop radical clerics from preaching
militancy in the UK. This, however, is intended to stop some Muslim
clerics who, the authorities believe, have used mosques to preach
radical messages of hate and jihad to the young, converting them
to militancy.
Though
the target might be the Muslim community, the government cannot,
for obvious reasons, legislate against a particular community.
One provision of the intended laws will make the promotion and glorification
of martyrdom an offence.
This,
no doubt, is because some Islamists believe that suicide bombers
and those who sacrifice themselves for a religious or national cause
are martyrs who will receive their just rewards in heaven.
But
are Muslims the only group engaged in suicide attacks or preach
martyrdom for those who commit suicide while killing and maiming
others?
Surely not! Shortly after the 7/7 suicide bombings here, when the
finger of suspicion pointed at Muslims, there were those ( including
some from the media) who directed public attention to the Tamil
Tigers who have made suicide killings a fetish and used this technique
to assassinate two national leaders and almost killed another.
Even
before the recent mindless attacks, when Muslims were being targeted
after 9/11, there were those who asked why the British authorities
were ignoring the activities of the Tigers here when the organisation
has been outlawed for the past several years.
Now
some in the Muslim community here are watching intently to see what
the British authorities are going to do when the LTTE comes to commemorate
its own Martyrs’ Day.
In
the Wanni, Mahaveer Day is observed on November 27 with LTTE leader
Velupillai Pirihaparan addressing the Tamils. It is observed here
on the following Sunday, if it falls on a weekday. The heroes including
suicide-killers who fell, are remembered during the day long commemoration
when the local Mahaveer Anton Balasingham addresses the multitude
and videos of various LTTE military victories and suicide attacks
are sold to the enthusiastic and impressionable young.
This
is very much in the style of the Iranian-Hizbollah that initiated
suicide attacks and martyrdom in recent times and also video-taped
them and other military attacks to help recruit new cadres.
It
is known that the LTTE has done the same including screening such
videos in schools here on the pretext of promoting cultural events.
It is known that protests were made to British authorities following
such screenings.
Now
it is being asked whether British authorities will act against the
LTTE too if they come to commemorate Heroes Day and for funding
a banned organisation by selling videos and other promotional material
that venerate the organisation in violation of British law.
All
these years, some Muslims say, they have been the target of public
abuse and official sanction. But those who made suicide bombings
a fine art have been untouched by the British authorities. If they
continue to do so despite their claims to fight terrorism anywhere,
then the British will be guilty of racial and religious bias.
That
would be detrimental to the post 7/7 efforts to reinvigorate the
dialogue between British authorities and Muslim community leaders
and young Muslims.
The
locally-born or bred persons suspected of being the 7/7 suicide
bombers and the abortive attempt later, were a rude awakening for
the British authorities and the people.
Up
to now they have been lax in fighting terrorism because it always
happened elsewhere. The lessons from these dreaded happenings, even
if read, were never taken to heart.
Those
who were trained in, or guilty of, violence at home found refuge
in this country with few questions asked. If now the British do
not learn their lessons and act appropriately, they would have nobody
to blame but themselves.
|