War
at Wahga
A daily military ritual at an India-Pakistan border
entrypoint shoots up patriotism
By Ameen Izzadeen
A. R. Radcliffe-Brown observed the rituals, including war dances,
of Andaman Island tribes, and came up with his theory of structural
functionalism in social anthropology. A social anthropologist following
A.R. Radcliffe-Brown’s structural functionalist school of
thought will consider the principal function of communal ritual
to be the expression or reaffirmation of sentiments of collective
loyalty.
Communal
rituals in society do not operate in a vacuum. They have their meanings
– well steeped in deep social, economic, political and cultural
realities. What Radcliffe-Brown saw some one hundred years ago in
the Andamans, I saw at the Wahga border, which the Redcliff Boundary
Commission drew 58 years ago splitting the subcontinent into two.
Yes,
rituals have relevance – but only as long as they contribute
towards the cohesiveness of society. When the Pakistani and Indian
troops at the Wahga border performed their well-coordinated military
exercise – an aggressive ritual that resembled a tribal war
dance – patriotism was at its peak. Thus in a functional sense,
this ritual at the border helps build up patriotism and unite people
speaking different languages and belonging to different ethnic groups
and ideologies under the banner of Pakistan or India.
Last
Friday, around 5 p.m., we gathered at the Lahore Pearl Continental
Hotel’s lobby where we were met by Sultan Hassan, a research
officer at the Islamabad Institute of Policy Research, a semi-government
think tank which sponsored our week-long tour. Sultan was with us
throughout the tour, taking care of our needs. Ours was a six-member
Sri Lanka print media delegation representing The Sunday Times,
the Daily Mirror, Lankadeepa, the Island, the Sunday Leader and
the Sunday Observer. When we stepped out of the hotel, we were met
by a member of a Pakistani elite security unit. With his escort
vehicle going in front, our Toyota mini bus left the hotel for the
Wahga border, which was a 40-minute drive from Lahore.
When
we alighted from the bus at the last military post on the Pakistani
side, a chorus of cheering greeted us. Was Shahid Afridi walking
into the crease to open batting for Pakistan? Well, the atmosphere
resembled an India-Pakistan cricket match. The gate ahead of us
had the Urdu words Bab-e-Azadi (Freedom Gate) embossed on it. We
were led through this open gate to the special tiers, from where
we had a good view of two iron gates – one belongs to Pakistan
and the other to India. The two gates are separated by a patch of
no-man’s land where the two flagpoles stand. The distance
from the Bab-e-Azadi gate to the border gates is about 40 metres.
The
time was around 5.45 p.m. People were still coming in. In keeping
with tradition, men took their seats on the right side tiers and
the women on the left, though we hardly saw the practice of sex
segregation in urban areas.
Playing a larger-than-life role and encouraging the crowd to join
the chorus was a flag-carrying 80-year-old man, who has been visiting
the site daily for the past 20 years. He was clad in a green kurtha,
white sarong and a white skull cap. The appliquéd Urdu words
‘Pakistan Zindabad’ (long live Pakistan) and the country’s
crescent-and-star symbol adorned the front and back of his kurtha.
He reminded us of the old man who was seen at every cricket match
Pakistan played and whom the Pakistanis fondly called ‘Chacha
Cricket’ or Uncle Cricket – the equivalent of our old
Percy.
But
they call this Wahga old man Bhaba (father). His name is Meherdeen.
His family lived on the Indian side of Punjab and was killed in
the 1947 partition riots. He survived to find a new meaning to his
life in the new state of Pakistan, which literally means the land
of purity or land of the pure. He has a younger partner, 28-year-old
Mohammed Shafeek, an eight-year veteran at the Wahga ceremony and
heir apparent to the aging Bhaba.
Bhaba
exhorted the crowd to join him. He would shout “Pakistan”.
The crowd would say “Zindabad”. He would shout ‘Nare
Thakbir’ the crowd would respond “Allahu Akbar”
(God is great). Pointing to the inscriptions on the Bab-e-Azadi
gate, he would ask the crowd: “Pakistan ki matlab kiya?”
(What is the meaning of Pakistan?). The crowd would say “Lailaha
Illallah” (There is no god but Allah). He would get angry
if the response lacked vigour. The cheering went on while the public
address system played patriotic Qawali songs.
Not
to be outdone, the Indians were also at their highest pitch. “Bharat
Matha Ki,” cried the crier. “Jay,” the crowd responded.
“Hindustan,” cried the crier. “Zindabad,”
the crowd shouted back. Exposing the feebleness of the two strong
iron gates and the strong fortification on either side, the sound
waves carrying the patriotic slogans travelled freely across, only
to be greeted with jeers the moment they crossed the border.
A
few minutes before the colourful ceremony began, I could see an
Indian military officer taking a group of friends to the fence that
stretched from the gates to the right and left as far as the eye
could see and beyond. The Indians took pictures of a Pakistani sentry
and said something to him. The Pakistani was not provoked. Perhaps
he was used to such antics.
Suddenly,
the cheering stopped on the Pakistani side. The public address system
blared verses from Quran, followed by prayers. The Indians continued
with their cheering and jeering. The Pakistanis were unruffled and
kept their composure.
The
time was exactly 6 p.m. Clad in ceremonial garb, members of the
elite Pakistani Rangers and the Indian Border Security Force were
ready for the showdown – their daily ritual, a belligerent
military show. The commanders barked out orders at the top of their
voices. It looked and sounded like a real war of words – a
sound war. The Pakistanis were elated as though they were winning
the war of the voices.
Then,
one by one, soldiers on either side in well synchronized and coordinated
steps, goose-marched towards each other, while stamping their feet
– with their boots almost touching their foreheads. They opened
the gates and took up their positions. They glared at their Indian
counterparts, who marched towards the gates in the same manner.
They huffed and puffed at each other as the ceremony continued and
climaxed in the lowering of the respective flags and the closing
of the gates.
Overcharged
with a high dose of patriotism, the Pakistanis felt their soldiers’
performance was better and encouraged them with thunderous applause.
We could hear similar applause on the other side of the border,
too. Maybe, those on the other side were thinking that the Indian
soldiers did a better job.
The 15-minute ceremony did arouse patriotic fervour in the Pakistanis
and the Indians present, but at the same time stressed the undercurrent
that they were also adversaries. But for thinking Pakistanis and
Indians, Wahga offers an opportunity to ponder the futility of the
belligerence that has led to three full-scale wars and several border
clashes between the two neighbours who are now armed with nuclear
weapons.
I
felt the ceremony required some amendments to underscore the need
for peace. Instead of banging their respective gates in each other’s
face at the end of the ceremony, they should finish it with a bear
hug, like Inidan Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and Pakistani
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif did on February 20, 1998 at Wahga.
The
New Delhi-Lahore bus service which Mr. Vajpayee and Mr. Sharif launched
on that date – the first such service since Independence –
operates twice or thrice a week. It supplements a train service
across the border.
With
relations between India and Pakistan improving and the two countries
taking several confidence building measures, including a gas pipeline
project from Iran to India across Pakistan, Wahga sends a confused
and contradictory signal. However, I thanked Sultan Hassan for taking
us to Wahga and helping us to get a once-in-a-life-time experience. |