Growing
diversification of industrial exports
The dominance of garment exports was a cause of anxiety. The question
was asked as to whether we had exchanged the vulnerability of the
economy owing to the dependence on primary commodities, especially
tea, for a new and even more serious vulnerability owing to the
dominance of garments in our exports. Export data reveal that there
has been a growing diversification in industrial exports in recent
years.
This
diversification is also a part of the overall diversification of
the country's exports that has been going on for the past 25 years,
from a predominance of plantation crop exports to a lesser dependence
on agricultural exports.
Agricultural
exports dominated the export structure from the time of independence
and till the 1980s, when a significant diversification of exports
occurred. By 1990 agricultural exports had declined to about 35
per cent of exports. By 2000 it had declined further to 21 per cent.
And in 2004 it was only 19 per cent. In fact agricultural and industrial
exports have exchanged their positions of importance over these
years. In 1977 agricultural exports accounted for 79 per cent of
exports. In 2004, agricultural exports had declined to only 19 per
cent. Conversely, Industrial exports that were only 14 per cent
in 1977 increased to 78 per cent of exports.
Such
a diversification was a healthy development for several reasons.
The dependence on low value primary agricultural exports whose prices
tended to fluctuate created serious instabilities. The dependence
on these agricultural exports was the reason for the serious deterioration
in terms of trade in the 1960's and 1970's. Industrial exports brought
in more foreign exchange earnings and employment opportunities.
Much of the economic growth in the post 1978 era could be attributed
to export-led growth based on light industrial exports. However,
there was anxiety and criticism that industrial exports were dominated
by a single export-- garments.
Fortunately,
industrial exports have diversified over this period and for the
first time garments contributed less than 50 per cent of total exports
in 2004. Other industrial exports accounted for 27 per cent of total
industrial exports. These other industrial exports are a wide range
of products. However, garments still dominate both industrial exports
and total exports. They constituted 53 per cent of total exports.
The rest of industrial exports are a diversified portfolio consisting
of rubber-based products (3.5 per cent), leather and footwear (4.4
per cent), ceramics (1.1 per cent), and machinery and equipment
(4.4 per cent). The exports in the first five months of this year
have confirmed this diversified portfolio.
These
structural changes in the export structure are of importance in
ensuring a greater stability of export incomes. This is especially
so as garments are an export whose competitiveness could be quickly
eroded by other countries. Fortunately even where this is concerned
the diversification within garments to a greater share in up-market
clothing has made these exports more reliable. Sri Lanka appears
to enjoy a good reputation and have a comparative advantage in these
garments.
This
trend in diversification should gain momentum for the export-led
strategy to ensure steady and sustainable growth in the economy.
The further diversification of industrial exports is dependent on
several factors. Increased foreign direct investment is one such
factor. A satisfactory law and order situation, political stability,
predictability of policies, improvements in infrastructure, lower
costs of production and availability of skilled personnel, are among
the pre-requisites.
Although
industrial diversification cannot be superimposed, either by the
government or private sector organisations, a study of potential
areas of developing comparative advantage should be a mission of
the government, as well as trade chambers. Market surveys abroad
and market links with marketing chains would be part of that strategy.
Once
industries with export potential are identified, they could be given
support in their initial years. What we urge is a policy thrust
that would encourage further industrial diversification. Much of
future economic growth would depend on the successful diversification
of exports.
|