No
support for Mahinda if he supports federalism: JHU
By Santhush Fernando
The Jathika Hela Urumaya parliamentary group leader Ven. Athureliye
Rathana Thera explaining his party’s position on the upcoming
Presidential Election and on plans to join the JVP with the fielding
of a common candidate said the JHU had no objections to uniting
with the JVP despite its hostile attitude towards the JHU in the
aftermath of the 2004 general elections and the incidents in parliament.
“Although
the JVP has been barbaric it had not been as barbaric as the LTTE.
But if it is genuinely willing to correct itself, the JVP’s
past will not matter only its future”, Ven. Rathana Thera
told The Sunday Times in an interview.
Following are excerpts:
The
Jathika Hela Urumaya came out publicly last week with an invitation
to its cold war opponent the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna for the purpose
of forming a JHU-JVP. What was the reason for this?
We
extended an open invitation to the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna leader
Somawansa Amerasinghe and are awaiting a response. This was done
following a Central Committee resolution adopted last Monday. But
still there is uncertainty about the policies of the JVP. We are
of the view the security of the country is in grave danger, and
we believe that a broad based alternative front against the Tigers
should be set up if we are to save the country.
But
aren’t there any differences in the policies of the two parties?
Yes. The JVP as a Marxist party accepts the dictatorship of the
working class and does not accept the spiritual foundation of man,
whereas we on the contrary believe in the middle path (as taught
in Buddhism) which advocates freedom and democracy.
Another
issue on which we differ from the JVP is concerning the rights of
the majority. The JVP does not accept the right of the majority
community, the Sinhalese. The reason for not recognising this is
the JVP’s belief in the working-class dictatorship.
We
also differ when it comes to the economy. They do not accept the
right to private enterprise while we recognize it. Malaysia during
former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed’s tenure rose up against
private entrepreneurs. Additionally we have a policy on the Preservation
of the Environment for Sustainable Development. We believe in a
holistic way of life whereas the Marxists believe in a secular lifestyle.
Hasn’t
the JVP in the past, been hostile towards the JHU?
Yes. Just after the 2004 General Elections the JVP tried to rob
the people’s mandate to the JHU, by abducting two of our priests
who were elected as members of parliament. More than that the trust
placed in the JVP by nationalistic quarters has been shattered as
it failed to coerce the UPFA government to protect nationalistic
interests. As an example it missed out on a golden opportunity to
capitalise on Karuna’s split. It lost on what the socialist
sections were able to accomplish during the United Front Government
in 1970. Due to the ineffectiveness of the JVP, the UPFA was worse
than the UNP when it comes to the handling of the peace process.
Although the JVP has been barbaric it had not been as barbaric as
the LTTE. But if it is genuinely willing to correct itself, the
JVP’s past will not matter to us but only its future.
UPFA
presidential candidate Mahinda Rajapakse is also canvassing, portraying
himself as a Sinhala Buddhist. What is your comment?
But if Mahinda declares that he too accepts the Oslo or the Tokyo
Declarations or in a federal solution we will not support him. However
we must note that he hasn’t been firm on the issues of national
security and privatisation of state property. When President Kumaratunga
was trying her level best to implement the P-TOMS, he along with
the two main parties blindly helped her cause.
However
he must not forget that he would not have been nominated from the
SLFP if not for the nationalistic vigour created in his Party which
resulted with the JHU coming into politics. So after getting nominations
Mahinda has to very clearly declare his policies. If he tries to
get the support of the Sinhalese quarters by playing a dual role
and then isolate the voters, we would prefer Ranil to him. It will
be political suicide.
|