The
poll and its ramifications
The nation's agony is over, with the Supreme Court's unanimous verdict
that Presidential elections must be held this year. Despite election
fatigue on the part of the Sri Lankan electorate with presidential
and parliamentary elections in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004 and several
local-level elections in between, there seems now to be an infectious
welcome notion that elections may change life for the better for
many Sri Lankans.
That
doesn't mean that people aren't pessimistic whether we will ever
find leaders to change this country's wretched contemporary course.
In his long-winded judgment, the chief justice has taken almost
half of the text to cast aspersions at Constitutional amendments
that led to this 'Gordian knot' as he adverts in his order.
Without
mincing his words, but without naming names, the CJ says that it
was late President J. R. Jayewardene and his advisers who used the
law to twist things to their political advantage. Their instrument?
The "mandate of the people' which was a licence to stomp upon
sacred institutions and fundamental tenets of democracy and good
governance.
With
great felicity of language, he shows how these amendments were used
at the whim and pleasure of the rulers of the time to perpetuate
their reign and their writ to govern. But some of the reasoning
in the judgment is arguable, such as when it delves into the causes
that triggered the northern insurgency -- tracing these to political
gerrymandering exclusively.
The
underlining morale of this judgment, however, is something that
one can endorse if not identify with. The first lesson drawn is
that it is the job of the courts to unravel and simplify complicated
matters -- and not compound them.
And that, two wrongs don't make a right.
The
inevitable conclusion of all of this hullabaloo is fundamental --
and it is that a President is elected for a period of six years.
To any layman,it means that if the elections were in December 1999
a period of six years would mean an election is due by December
2005.
If
any incumbent President wishes to call for early elections and take
political advantage of that exercise, as this President did in 1999,
he or she cannot do so on the basis of a convoluted constitutional
amendment and start playing new math with her second term of office.
All
the legal arguments and Constitutional punditry pales into insignificance
in the face of common logic. The Supreme Court has not lost its
focus on the Constitution, nor its bearings that seem firmly founded
on reality. Now, having gone through this unnecessary experience
- where the Elections Commissioner was also of this same view, and
the matter went to court notwithstanding - it might be considered
when future Constitutions or amendments are being drafted, to stipulate
a fixed term of office for the President, as in the US. This is
so that the people will know when an election will be held and when
a President takes office, without having to keep calculators in
their pockets to work out dates.
That's
if the nation is still in favour of an Executive Presidency in the
first place. There will also be the added benefit of having to do
away with the need to have purported swearing-in ceremonies. No
doubt this decision comes hard on the incumbent President who believed
she had one more year to stamp her legacy upon the country. Unfortunately,
her one closing act has been to award herself some state land through
the cabinet she heads.
We
must now also look towards a short Presidential election campaign.
It's almost a matter for celebration that we have two main contenders,
both of whom have stayed the course with their respective parties,
through good times and bad, and can claim to be decent politicians
— albeit a few blemishes.
The
electorate can look forward to a hard fought but clean contest and
we daresay, may the better man win. But we must look at the elections
and beyond. It's crucial that both candidates keep a close eye on
their security, as there may be certain quarters that have a grander
scheme in their minds than seeing the next President simply being
elected.
Both
contenders must strive to open up to issue-based politics as opposed
to the long-tradition of the politics of brag and bluster. They
must strive to focus both during the campaign and thereafter on
the common issues that face their countrymen, such as the northern
revolt, the issue of unemployment the cost of living and crime.
Let
the mud-slinging posters, violence and poltical slang on public
platforms be dumped into Sri Lanka’s political history. If
we are to look beyond a presidential election, where this fractured
island, both the North and the South, is united, this is the time
for a new beginning.
|