World
Bank advocates pro-equity policies to reduce poverty
Equity, defined primarily as equality of opportunities among people,
should be an integral part of a successful poverty reduction strategy
anywhere in the developing world, says the World Bank’s annual
2006 World Development Report released last week.
“Equity
is complementary to the pursuit of long-term prosperity,”
said François Bourguignon, the Bank’s Chief Economist
and Senior Vice President for Development Economics, who guided
the team that produced the report. “Greater equity is doubly
good for poverty reduction. It tends to favor sustained overall
development, and it delivers increased opportunities to the poorest
groups in a society.”
Equity
and Development, produced by an eight-member team of authors led
by economists Francisco Ferreira and Michael Walton, makes the case
for equity, not just as an end in itself, but because it often stimulates
greater and more productive investment, which leads to faster growth.
The report shows how wide gulfs of inequality in wealth and opportunity,
both within and among nations, contribute to the persistence of
extreme deprivation, often for a large proportion of the population.
This wastes human potential and, in many cases, can slow the pace
of sustained economic growth.
Pro-equity
policies can bridge these gulfs, the authors conclude. The objective
is not equality of incomes, but rather to expand access by the poor
to health care, education, jobs, capital, and secure land rights.
Crucially, equity requires greater equality of access to political
freedoms and political power. It also means breaking down stereotyping
and discrimination, and improving access to justice systems and
infrastructure.
“Public
action should seek to expand the set of opportunities of those who
have the least voice and fewest resources and capabilities,”
World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz says in the foreword to the
report. “It should do so in a manner that respects and enhances
individual freedoms, as well as the role of markets in allocating
resources.”
To
increase equity within developing countries, the report calls specifically
for policies that correct for persistent inequalities in opportunity,
by leveling the economic and political playing fields. Many such
policies will also increase economic efficiency and correct market
failures. These policies include:
•
Investing in people, by expanding access to quality health and education
services, and providing safety nets for vulnerable groups;
•
Expanding access to justice, land, and economic infrastructure such
as roads, power, water, sanitation and telecommunications;
•
Promoting fairness in financial, labor, and product markets, so
that poor people have easier access to credit and jobs, and are
not discriminated against in any market.
Pro-equity
policy changes
Examples of pro-equity policy changes include land reform. In the
Indian state of West Bengal, for example, a land tenancy reform
increased security of tenure for sharecroppers, while also guaranteeing
them at least 75 percent of output.
Land
productiviy rose by 62 percent as a result. Increasing poor people’s
access to credit and insurance has proven to be another effective
way of leveling opportunities to increase prosperity. Studies in
India, Kenya and Zimbabwe, among other developing countries, show
that the poor must pay much higher interest rates than the rich.
“We would thus expect the poor to under-invest, certainly
relative to the rich, but also relative to what would happen if
markets functioned properly,” the report concludes.
In
addition to domestic reforms, the report also calls on nations to
promote greater equity in the global arena, notably in the international
markets for labor, goods, ideas and capital. To achieve this, it
urges rich countries to allow greater migration for unskilled workers
from developing countries, to press ahead with trade liberalization
under the Doha Round at the WTO, to allow poor countries to use
generic drugs, and to develop financial standards appropriate to
developing countries. It also reiterates the importance of increased
and more effective development aid.
A
mix of these policies, applied with close attention to specific
conditions in different countries, can help give poor people more
equal opportunities, at once increasing their economic contribution
to their societies, and reducing their own poverty.While pointing
out the negative consequences of extreme inequality, the WDR draws
a clear distinction between equality and equity. Equity, the authors
say, is not the same as equality in incomes, or health status, or
any other specific outcome. Rather, it is the quest for a situation
in which opportunities are equal, that is, where personal effort,
preferences and initiative—and not family background, caste,
race, or gender—account for the differences between people’s
economic achievements.
The
report makes the case that equity and prosperity are complementary,
citing examples in which high levels of economic and political inequality
lead to economic institutions and social arrangements that systematically
favor the interests of those with more influence. Such institutions,
it argues, undermine a country's potential for growth and poverty
reduction.
“Inequitable
institutions impose economic costs,” said Francisco Ferreira,
a lead author of the report. “They tend to protect the interests
of politically influential and wealthy people, often to the detriment
of the majority. This makes society as a whole more inefficient.
If the middle and poorer groups are not able to exploit their talent,
society loses opportunities for innovation and investment.”
Inequitable
institutions
One example of inequitable institutions emerges from a study of
women farmers in Ghana, who do not have secure rights to their land.
Because their access to it is uncertain, the women cultivate their
land every growing season, failing to leave it fallow during some
seasons, as they should in order to maintain its fertility. They
do this because of fear that the land would be taken from them by
higher-status individuals, usually men, on the pretext that the
women are not putting the land to use. The productivity of their
land declines as a result, creating a vicious circle of low productivity
and widening inequality.
Inequality
traps emerge when inequalities between individuals and groups are
perpetuated over time, within and across generations. These traps
are marked by high child mortality rates and low school completion
rates, unemployment and low incomes repeated over generations. Opportunities,
large or small, are passed on from father to son, mother to daughter.
This persistence reduces the incentives for individual investment
and innovation, and weakens the development process. They are perpetuated,
the report says, by interlocking economic, political and socio-cultural
mechanisms, such as discriminatory attitudes and practices relating
to race, ethnicity, gender and social class.
To
help societies escape these inequality traps, the World Bank report
stresses the importance of strengthening the “agency”
of poor and excluded groups, that is, their ability to press for
stronger mechanisms of voice and political accountability. By insisting
on more checks and balances on the abuse of economic and political
power by elites, the poor and excluded—often including women
as a group—can build alliances with middle classes in support
of strategies for equitable change. Such strategies would serve
to undermine oligarchic dominance and level the playing field in
the political arena, without resorting to the kind of unsustainable
populist policies that have failed in the past.
Achieve
empowerment
Equity and Development’s prescriptions complement the conclusions
of the Bank’s World Development Reports for 2004 and 2005,
which focused on enhancing access to services for the poor and improving
the investment climate.
“We
argue that an approach to development that is deeply informed by
equity is consistent with the frameworks in the last two World Development
Reports,” said Michael Walton, another lead author of the
report. “Indeed, equity is a fundamental part of the package
needed to achieve empowerment and a better investment climate. It
is also essential to achieving the Millennium Development Goals.”
|