| “Forsaken 
              land’ forsaken on army’s behalf? The producer of Cannes award winning film Sulanga Enu Pinisa (The 
              Forsaken Land) has called for a halt to its screening, but the National 
              Film Corporation (NFC) is refusing to do so. Earlier in the week 
              the movie’s director along with three others were advised 
              by army top brass that they “would have to face the consequences 
              if they continue to produce movies of this nature.’’
  Sulanga 
              Enu Pinisa Producer Upul Shantha Sannasgala told this newspaper 
              that he has called for the halt to its screening, as the NFC has 
              withdrawn the film from the five mainline cinemas prematurely. They 
              have not given the producer any good reason for this move he said. 
              A spokesman for the NFC however said, “the withdrawal was 
              on prior agreement with the producer, as the film Sulanga was to 
              be screened in place of Sulanga Enu Pinisa.”  “Is 
              it a case of Sulanga Enu Pinisa being ditched for ‘Sulanga’ 
              enu pinisa – to make room for Sulanga?” “It cannot 
              be – it’s a cover for outside pressures,’’ 
              says Sannasgala, but the NFC spokesman states that the entire brouhaha 
              is probably “a publicity gambit by the producer and the director 
              of Sulanga Enu Pinisa.’’ The spokesman also says that 
              the film corporation will continue to screen Sulanga Enu Pinisa 
              whether the producer of the movie likes it or not, as it is “an 
              international award winning film which we are proud to exhibit.’’Producer Sannasgala promises to obtain a court injunction to have 
              his own film stopped, as he says that running it in the alternate 
              circuit when the film is making money in the mainline cinemas looks 
              like an act of sabotage on the part of the NFC.
 “Can 
              they say that they will run the movie against my wishes? How can 
              they do that when I have stopped the poster campaign, and the promotion? 
              How will I generate adequate financial returns in this atmosphere 
              of protest?” he asks.  Sannasgala 
              says that the reason for the NFC’s decision to withdraw his 
              movie is most probably due to “outside pressure’’ 
              on the NFC, but he declines to name names. Meanwhile the Free Media 
              Movement (FMM) has issued a statement against the Army’s accusation 
              of “new terrorism’’ aimed against film makers 
              Prasanna Vithanage, Sugath Mahadivulweva, Asoka Handagama and Vimukthi 
              Jayewadene, calling for an immediate halt to this sort of intimidation 
              by the Army.  The 
              FMM also sates that “filmmakers such as Vimukthi Jayasundera 
              now face calls to leave the country and others have had to face 
              serious problems.’’ FMM spokesman Sunanda Deshapriya 
              also claims that he has been threatened for issuing the statement. 
               Brigadier 
              Daya Ratnayake and Vice Admiral Sarath Weerasekera were both present 
              at the informal meeting held at the premises of an advertising agency 
              last week at which the film directors present were advised that 
              they will have to face the consequences of their filmmaking if war 
              breaks out, unless they will “also make films on behalf of 
              the army.’’ Former NFC director Tissa Abeysekera who 
              was present at the meeting however is said to have been sympathetic 
              to the cause of the artistes. |