PM's
faux pas
The Government's Presidential candidate Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapakse
has made a bad error of judgement.
His
decision to make a Fundamental Rights application to Court to stop
the Police from proceeding with an inquiry into allegations of misappropriation
of tsunami relief funds - in which his own conduct is the subject
of that inquiry - is to say the least, an issue of very grave public
concern.
Public
figures in any country have always been expected to abide by that
age-old dictum; that they should, like Caesar's wife, be above suspicion.
Unfortunately, what the PM has done is only to add fuel to allegations
against him.
It
was this newspaper that gave detailed accounts of the PM's defence
when allegations of corrupt practices first emerged against him.
The defence seemed plausible enough and the PM's hand in whether
public donations for tsunami relief work were siphoned off to private
accounts for his personal ( or political ) benefit seemed to indicate
that this was a bona fide error on the part of his Office.
So,
the best course of action for him would have been to allow - if
not request an acceleration of - the investigations against him
so that his name is cleared.
The
PM's advisers may have felt that there were political machinations
by others in the Government who want to oust him from the Presidential
race. And that, as the Penal Code says that even a temporary misappropriation
of funds is a criminal act, he could be disqualified from contesting
the Presidency if some interim court order is given against him
before Nomination Day.
A
lawyer might advise him not to take chances, and to, therefore,
seek redress from Court. But the PM is contesting for the biggest
and most important job in the country. And he must win public confidence
of the 13 million people who will vote on November 17.
No
doubt he has weighed the pros and cons of the move and decided that
there is a greater need to ensure he is not technically disqualified.
He also probably realises that the ordinary voter of this country
does not care a damn about these niceties relating to corruption.
He
may be correct, judging by the way millions of rupees are being
collected by all major political parties from all sections of the
sleazy business world, and nobody seems overly concerned.
But
- if the PM is above board as he claims he is - then his decision
has set a terrible precedent; a bad example - and is not the kind
of leadership that the country would like to have.
A
sop from the EU
There are mixed reactions from different quarters on the most recent
statement issued by the European Union (EU) vis-a-vis the LTTE.
While some are ecstatic over the strongest ever statement by the
25-nation EU against the LTTE, others feel it is a poor sop for
the assassination of a Foreign Minister.
The
LTTE in the meantime, reacting to the EU decision want sympathy
for their cause while at the same time threaten war.
Britain,
it seems spearheaded the campaign for a strong statement from the
EU, partly to coincide with Mr. Tony Blair's visit to New Delhi.
But for all intents and purposes, the EU Statement - gung-ho as
it may sound - is still quite cosmetic. In Britain itself, the TRO
- the relief organisation of the Tamil diaspora has been found by
the country's Charity Commissioner to be a front organisation for
the LTTE, but was permitted to simply transfer all their funds to
another organisation with a different name board.
Sri
Lanka's campaign was largely the work of the Minister-less Foreign
Office, its officials in Colombo and its diplomats in Europe with
the possible exception of two of them based in Scandinavia.
There
were many flaws though. For one, Brussels, the Headquarters of the
EU has no Sri Lanka Ambassador to lobby anyone. No professional
Aide Memoire or dossier containing the Police investigations into
the murder of Mr. Lakshman Kadirgamar, or a legal analysis of international
law was disseminated among EU members. EU Ambassadors in Colombo
could have been given a ' walk through ' of the site of the killing
to drive home the point.
The
bigger question, however, is, what next ? .
These ad-hoc, stop-start measures like the EU's statement probably
mean very little to the LTTE which has its tentacles spread throughout
the world. They will probably now spend some time concentrating
on their operations in South East Asia - the location for their
arms shipments.
They
have survived killing a Prime Minister of one of the most populous
countries in the world. And of a President in Sri Lanka. A seafaring
community, they know the vagaries of wind and sail. All they need
to do is bide their time for calmer seas. |