LK:
Quintessential Sri Lankan
It was a privilege to have known Lakshman Kadirgamar (LK) who was
born on April 12, 1932 and died on August 12, 2005. Ours was a brief
but glorious friendship. Fittingly so, for in most matters, the
LK I knew preferred quality to quantity.
It
was another civilized Sri Lankan and yet another victim of the savage
LTTE -- Neelan Tiruchelvam -- who introduced me to LK about a decade
ago. I had applied for a position in an international organisation
and was keen to have a letter of endorsement from the Foreign Minister.
Consequent to a meeting I had with him, arranged by Neelan, LK,
kind and generous as ever, gave me the piece of paper I had sought.
Years
passed by and during this period I watched with great admiration
from the sidelines LK's brilliant and spellbinding performance as
our foreign minister. In particular, I relished the finesse with
which he handled the challenge of LTTE terrorism. To say that it
was primarily LK's powers of persuasion and skilful handling of
sensitive domestic and international issues that redeemed Sri Lanka's
sullied image is no exaggeration. Needless to say, several dedicated
and effective Sri Lankan diplomats played their crucial part in
this restoration process, but the helmsman was clearly LK.
It
was around this time that I confessed to my friend Nanda Godage,
who had then just returned to the Foreign Ministry after his ambassadorial
stint in Brussels, my desire to seek to build on my acquaintance
with his minister. I was anxious to let LK know how glad I was that
he was Sri Lanka's foreign minister. I also wished to engage him
in friendly debate about aspects of our international relations,
and subject to review, the political pluses and minuses of his colleagues
in government.
Nanda
in turn encouraged me to get to know LK better observing that any
and all encounters with the man should prove both congenial and
wholesome.
Emboldened thus, I indeed made the effort to cultivate a friendship
with LK and he responded graciously and warmly. This is how I came
by the immense benefit of having LK as my friend, philosopher and
guide and the memories of my subsequent close association with him
I shall cherish for the rest of my life.
The 'mellow tones' of LK that his Oxford contemporary Peter Jay
has spoken about, I shall always remember. Ranil Wickremesinghe,
in the course of his tribute to LK in Parliament, had noted that
a meal with the minister offered food for the body as well as the
mind. On most occasions a mere telephone conversation with him provided
such nourishment for the soul.
We
began to meet each other frequently for chats on the vital issues
of the day and these close encounters enabled me to discover for
myself what an exceptional human being LK was. He was an exemplary
citizen of Sri Lanka. There was not in him a trace of racism. He
was Sri Lankan to the core.
And, to my mind, great and irreparable as the loss of LK is, the
greater tragedy is that neither the zealots amongst the Sinhalese
who mourned his death nor their counterparts within the Tamil community
who rejoiced over it understood, or yet truly understand, Lakshman
Kadirgamar the man. Both groups have missed the wood for the trees.
The
Sinhala zealots (who, by the way, as Silan Kadirgamar pointed out
at the memorial service at The Cathedral, did not even know how
to spell or pronounce his name properly) mistook his principal and
resolute opposition to the separatist extremism of the LTTE as a
sign of his "pro-Sinhalaness".
Their moral inadequacy from which arose their failure and refusal
to understand LK's heartfelt aversion to ethnic labels made the
Tamil zealots conclude that his championing of and overarching Sri
Lankan identity was an act of political expediency at best and a
manifestation of "anti-Tamilness" at worst. It is ultimately
the tragedy of Sri Lanka that neither zealot will ever know the
essential goodness of the man whose passing all true Sri Lankans
will mourn sincerely.
My
abiding memory of LK will be his innate Sri Lankanness. He desperately
strove to make all Sri Lankans -- Muslim, Tamil, Burgher, Sinhala
-- live together in a united nation. He put Sri Lanka on the map.
His last public act on the evening of August 12, 2005 was to preside
over a ceremony to mark the release of the inaugural issue of International
Relations in a Globalising World (IRGW), the journal of the Bandaranaike
Centre of International Studies (BCIS).
The
launching of IRGW, as Adam Roberts, another Balliol man, has pointed
out, was a key part of LK's long-term plan to raise the level of
Sri Lanka's contribution to international diplomacy. In similar
vein, his decision to bring out a felicitation volume in honour
of Stanley Kirinde (LK was to have presided over the launch of this
publication on August 18, 2005), I am personally aware, was part
of his long-term plan to raise the level of Sri Lanka's contribution
to the world of culture and the arts.
He
felt that with the kind of heritage we Sri Lankans are heirs to
we ought to give the world, as he so aptly puts it, " something
more than just tea, tourism and terrorism" that unfortunately
we have become known for in recent years.
He wanted a book on a Sri Lankan artist that would be "an ideal
brand label for Sri Lanka, an image which can be projected all over
the world as the face of Sri Lanka in all its many forms".
As
chairman of the Stanley Kirinde Felicitation Committee, LK laboured
long and hard to get The World of Stanley Kirinde published. He
spent hours coaxing potential donors, encouraging its author Sinharaja
Tammita - Delgoda and spurring him on his way. The result is a monumental
and exquisite piece of work -- an achievement LK was delighted with.
All
in all, Lakshman Kadirgamar was a peerless fellow-traveller, a man
of the utmost refinement of word, thought and deed. Sri Lanka can
ill afford to lose sons of his calibre. But, then it is the tall
trees that catch the wind. He will be much missed by every decent
Sri Lankan in the dark days and years that loom before us.
Tissa
Jayatilaka
|