E.B.
Creasy AGM turns stormy
Local shareholder threatened with ejection
By Duruthu Edirimuni
The E.B. Creasy and Company annual general meeting turned stormy
last week with the chairman A. Rajaratnam describing as a “troublesome
foreigner” one of the biggest foreign investors in the stock
market and threatening to throw out a minority shareholder.
The
incident occurred when shareholders asked probing questions about
the firm’s performance amid allegations of financial irregularities.
It comes amid growing concern among shareholders, especially minority
shareholders, that they are not being treated properly and that
corporate managements are not forthcoming enough about the way companies
are run.
Al
Nakib, a Kuwaiti investor, who together with his brother T.T. Nakib
controls 14.5 percent of E.B. Creasy, making them the second largest
shareholders, was called ‘troublesome’ by the management
at the annual general meeting (AGM) when he questioned certain transactions
of the company.
“I
was going to ask a question and the chairman said that he knows
me as a troublesome foreigner. Then a lot of minority shareholders
defended me, saying that the chairman was behaving inappropriately,”
Al Nakib told The Sunday Times FT.
A
minority shareholder, M. Mohideen, who defended Al Nakib, was threatened
with ejection. Mohideen said he was disappointed with the way the
board of directors conducted themselves at the AGM.
Al
Nakib said he challenged the chairman to enforce the threat but
that then S.D.D.R. Arudpragasam, managing director of E.B. Creasy,
intervened and said the threats were not meant for him.
“But
I said that it does not matter, because he is also a shareholder.
I took it as an insult addressed to me,” he said. “They
were very insolent and discriminatory, because I was a foreigner.
I informed the house that since I was a shareholder, regardless
of my nationality, I was entitled to ask questions.”
Rajaratnam
was not available for comment but Arudpragasam, Managing Director,
E.B. Creasy, who was the deputy chairman of the AGM, responded to
the allegations. Al Nakib said that he was also denied his right
to talk to the auditors. “Since I did not get any answers,
I walked out. I plan to take them to courts,” he said.
The
questions that he tried to ask were essentially about where monies
that were entitled to the shareholders went to, but he did not get
an answer from the chairman, A. Rajaratnam.
Al
Nakib alleged that E.B. Creasy, which acquired 4.5 million bonus
shares from its subsidiary company, Lankem Ceylon had manipulated
the funds by transferring them among the group companies. E.B. Creasy
owns 80 percent of Lankem Ceylon.
“When
I asked why it was not reflected in the annual report, he did not
answer the question and said that I was a troublesome foreigner,”
he said. “Rajaratnam claimed that E.B. Creasy sold the shares
on the market, but he would not give the price and the date of the
sale.”
The
firm’s annual report does not make any specific reference
to the share sale, he said. Upon checking CSE records, Nakib said
that he found out that such a sale had not taken place.
“Lankem
Ceylon declared a bonus issue in 2004, where one share was given
free for every two shares held. According to the annual report these
shares were not reflected and I wanted to know what had happened,
but I did not get an answer. I asked a legitimate question and these
people were very rude to me,” Nakib said.
He
also alleged that E.B. Creasy was lending to companies that were
not related to them. “In note 13 to the financial statements,
there are 14 companies which are not at all related to E.B. Creasy.
The only relationship is that some directors of E.B. Creasy sit
on the boards of these companies,” he said.
Nakib
said that he obtained a court order in February, stopping E.B. Creasy
from lending to these companies. “Despite this, they have
lent funds to these firms. This is contempt of court,” he
said.
E.B.
Creasy’s Arudpragasam said there were some differences of
opinion at the meeting and it was not orderly with shareholders
becoming unruly, while trying to talk at the same time.
He
said there was ‘one hostile shareholder’ at the AGM
who was provocative. “He is a hostile shareholder, who had
taken the company to court. We explained that the bonus shares he
asked about were sold to Colombo Fort Land and Building Company
(CFLB),” he said.
He
said Nakib is a short term investor in the CSE and the company cannot
be managed to suit his needs. He said Nakib became a shareholder
about one year ago and from the way he has been investing in the
CSE, it is evident that he is a short term investor. “For
the past 18 years, we have been managing the company. When it was
near virtual liquidation, we managed to turn the company around,”
he added.
When
asked whether Rajaratnam called Nakib a troublesome foreigner, he
said the former had said so because Nakib had been hostile. “What
the chairman meant was that usually non national shareholders were
very friendly people who are cooperative with the management. In
this particular case, he (Nakib) has been very hostile,” he
said.
Arudpragasam
said that the bonus shares were renounced and the company managed
to sort out some debts. The company has 20 large shareholders, who
own 96.48 percent between them. The total shareholders amount to
503 and CFLB is the largest shareholder with 52.4 percent. “Together
with associate companies of CFLB, it owns more than 75 percent in
E.B. Creasy,” Arudpragasam said.
“He
was not allowing the meeting to be conducted properly, but we answered
his questions,” he said. He said there was no necessity for
Nakib to talk to the auditors, because the head table was willing
to answer the questions. “It is not that we did not want him
to question the auditors and he could always do so,” Arubpragasam
said. He said that the company is in a particular group, owned by
CFLB, and that this allows the transactions to the 14 firms.
Nakib,
however, said these companies are owned by CFLB, but not by E.B.
Creasy. “Therefore it is not legal,” he said. Arudpragasam
said foreign shareholders are always welcome to invest in the company,
but when they try to influence company decision making for their
short term gain, the management has to be prejudiced against them.
|