The
legacy of CBK
Former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga has left office
rather ignominiously, minus all the grand plans she had for her
exit. She really can't blame the incumbent President for doing what
he did, and robbing her of her last hurrah after all the things
she said and did against him, in public and in private, in the run-up
to the elections.
Very
few incumbents are joyful at their term of office coming to an end
and seeing someone (other than their kith and kin) taking their
seat. And very few successors say anything nice about the predecessors
- it was the same with all former Presidents.
But
Ms. Kumaratunga's exit has been shrouded with more than all that.
It has been marred by some elements of sleaze that her predecessors
had hardly been tainted by.
There
have been reports of her purchasing houses and apartments overseas,
most of which may not even be true. Triggered by her frequent trips
to the UK and France, these reports have snowballed simply because
she -- unlike Caesar's wife -- has not been above suspicion.
There
was never a hint of similar stories about President J.R. Jayewardene
or D.B. Wijetunga or even R. Premadasa, whatever their faults --
buying houses abroad; they were simply not thought of that way.
In the case of Ms. Kumaratunga, stories have been allowed to circulate
and her own conduct has not helped. When she increased the frequency
of her visits to the UK, asking for appointments with British Prime
Minister Tony Blair and being turned down, it became a matter of
national pride. She ignored the snubs, but we cared.
That
was why we began asking at the time whether her visits, always unannounced
on the grounds of security concerns, were State visits or otherwise,
and it was only then that the President's Office began saying what
they were; classifying them accordingly.
In
Sri Lanka, however, there are some acts that test her credibility.
One is the way she got State land, which now houses the upmarket
Waters Edge golf club near Parliament given by the Cabinet (based
on her own Cabinet paper) to some local and Japanese investors to
build a golf course, having kicked out some poor people who lived
there, and then got those same investors paid over Rs.150 million
by the present local investor in this State land. It would be interesting
if someone were to investigate who these investors recommended by
Ms. Kumaratunga were and to whom the Rs. 150 million was paid.
The
other issues -- quite apart from building a Presidential Palace
for herself (a project now abandoned after wasting Rs. 900 million
on it), are the recent last minute efforts to pass 1 1/2 acres of
State freehold land worth Rs. 350 million for herself in the vicinity
of that abandoned project. And then, on the eve of the November
17 elections -- the very day before the elections - transferring
a fantastic Rs. 600 million in two cheques from the President's
Fund of which she was the Chairperson to a hastily set-up Trust,
of which she was the founder.
A
classic case of taking from the right hand and giving the left hand;
or as the pithy Sinhala idiom puts it 'handa athey thiyanakota kaagen
ahannada' -- who is there to ask permission from when the spoon
is in your hand.
This
rekindles memories of the last-minute writing of deeds on the eve
of the Land Reform Law being passed in Parliament in 1972; the subject
of a Vote of No Confidence on Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike in 1975.
The former President has taken a parting shot in a press release
explaining her position (not at all convincingly though) and referred
to the new President's own 'Helping Hambantota Fund' that is also
shrouded in mystery.
We
have stated in these very columns that President Mahinda Rajapakse
ought not to have invoked the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to stop
such an inquiry because it has only fuelled concern over his own
integrity in the use of public funds.
But
two wrongs don't make a right. Already the JVP has raised the issue
of large Cabinets as a waste of public funds. The example of tightening
belts must come from the political leadership of the country. You
cannot expect a government servant to switch off an extra bulb at
a micro-level or instill financial discipline at a macro-level when
the political leadership does not lead by example. It is praiseworthy
that the new President has cancelled the Rs. 600 million cheques
allocated by former President Kumaratunga to her own Trust but it
smacks of political tit-for-tat. Such measures must come as a public
duty.
Transparency
International this week issued a report on the misuse of State property
at the recent Presidential elections. These are indictments on good
governance in Sri Lanka. This new government must not hesitate to
take stern measures -- as a matter of course -- whenever matters
concerning the abuse of public funds come to its attention. The
public purse belongs to the people. Not to the rulers to serve themselves.
|