Long
march to rebuild their once shattered lives
By Anthony David and Chris Kamalendran
Udaththanai, Amban and Vallipuram in the northern tip of the country
were among three of the coastal villages badly affected by the December
26 tsunami, with the residents trying hard to recover and return
to their normal lives.
As
most of those living along the coastal belt the villagers saw their
fishing boats being washed away, their houses destroyed by the sea
and loved ones dragged into a watery grave.
Twelve
months after the disaster they continue to live in tents put up
by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees with no immediate
hopes of permanent houses being constructed in the foreseeable future.
“We
are not sure when permanent houses would be put up for us. There
is no one in a position to give us any definite date”, Paneer
Chelvan (38) said.
But, Chelvan’s concerns are not confined to these villagers
in the north. These concerns are common to villagers living in the
52 Divisional Secretariat areas that were affected by the tsunami.
The
reconstruction work on some 100,000 houses that were destroyed has
been, for a range of reasons, lagging behind the target date set
for completion.
Confusion
and contradictions on the buffer zone which initially was a bar
for reconstruction of damaged houses and subsequently revised this
week, the non-availability of suitable land and the failure to properly
monitor the progress on the reconstruction of houses by non-governmental
organisations were some of the reasons for the lack of progress.
The
reconstruction process in the north and east has been relatively
slower compared to the south. But even in areas in the south including
Galle there have been instances where the authorities have not been
able to put up some form of temporary shelter and as a result the
families live in tents which are vulnerable to the heavy showers
and strong winds as experienced in the past few weeks.
In
Colombo a range of statistics are being made available about the
reconstruction programme, but in reality one year after the devastation
the progress appears to be slow, according to some Government Agents.
In Jaffna according to the District Secretary’s office 5,479
houses were damaged – 4,299 fully and 1,180 partially, but
so far only 159 have been fully constructed while 459 have been
partially completed and 576 have been categorized as work in progress
indicating they are still at the preliminary stages including the
surveying of lands.
This
amounts to just 20 per cent of the total number of houses required
in the district. In the Mullaitivu district which was also badly
devastated by the tsunami, 5,900 houses were fully or partially
damaged, of this only 500 houses have been completed so far but
yet to be handed over to the beneficiaries.
The reconstruction work has been further hampered by the heavy rains
experienced during the past two months.
With
the construction of houses for those living within the buffer zone
areas yet to get underway, the 500 houses constructed for those
living outside the buffer zone cannot be handed over as the distribution
of these houses is likely to cause uneasiness among the others.
In Trincomalee too the reconstruction of houses has been relatively
slow with issues ranging from obtaining suitable land and the lack
of supervision of non-governmental organizations being some of the
reasons.
The
district requires about 6,206 houses and of them 116 have been completed
and 141 will be ready for handing over on the first anniversary
of the tsunami while work on the construction of 850 has begun.
Batticaloa
which also witnessed large scale damages needs 23,000 houses. About
125 houses have been completed within the buffer zone area while
500 more have come up above foundation level and 1000 still at the
foundation level.
Outside
the buffer zone with financial assistance some 1,500 house have
been completed. Ampara requires a total of 11,029 houses, but only
401 have been completed while 722 still are under construction.
In
the southern province the situation has been better than that of
the east, but comparatively less than expected. The 100-metre buffer
zone in the south and 200-metre zone in the north and east turned
to be a serious issue due to the scarcity of land prompting the
government and the NGOs to go searching for new land.
However
the government’s decision this week to relax the buffer zone
in almost all parts of the country is likely to ease the current
problem, but has caused some complications as some of the tsunami
victims have already begun constructing their houses in areas outside
the buffer zone in keeping with the earlier enforced restrictions.
The
government has introduced two different programmes for the reconstruction
of houses. One is known as Donor Built reconstruction programme
under which all families affected were entitled to a house built
by a donor while the other is under the Home Owner driven housing
reconstruction programme with the provision of a cash grant.
An
owner of a partly damaged house was paid Rs. 100,000 while the owner
of a fully damaged house was entitled to Rs. 250,000. While 55,525
of the tsunami-affected people received the first instalment under
the Home Owner driven programme only 491 have received the fourth
and final instalment giving an indication as to the slow progress
of the construction programme.
A
report prepared by government agencies, NGOs and UN agencies on
the tsunami recovery progress, to have been officially released
yesterday said under the transitional shelter programme, 54,102
transitional shelters were put up by November and 1,948 are in the
process of being completed.
The report said the quality of these transitional shelters was not
always upto standards and upgrading was underway and a programme
of care and maintenance was also being developed.
But,
in some areas the transitional shelters mostly built using timber
have already begun to decay, with no replacement or upgrading until
permanent shelters are ready with the requirement to change or replace
them before the 2005/2006 monsoon emphasized.
SOCIAL STIGMA FOR VICTIMS?: undp REPORT
Social stigma, depression among widowers, increased alcohol use
among teenagers are all highlighted in the voices of tsunami survivors
that were captured in a series of "People's Consultations"
in Sri Lanka.
The 800 focus-group discussions that were carried out in 1,100 villages
in the 13 affected districts in the island were conducted by the
Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka in collaboration with the United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the University of Colombo.
A news
release from the UNDP states that these consultations have allowed
tsunami survivors to express their concerns and aspirations, thereby
empowers them to map out their futures. It not only helped officials
ascertain the needs, concerns and ideas of the affected, and share
these findings with relevant development actors, but also turned
out to be an important way to disseminate information on critical
issues and decisions to the affected communities. The dialogues
highlight that more women than men perished in the disaster, leaving
an unprecedented number of widowers suffering from depression and
stigma. Many husbands who lost their wives on December 26 find it
difficult to look after young children while also being sole breadwinners
for their families.
In
addition, the research reveals an increase of alcohol consumption
among men and teenage boys, large numbers of absenteeism and a high
number of dropouts recorded in schools in affected districts since
the tsunami.
Some of the people affected by the tsunami are suffering from social
stigma and many talk of being labelled as ‘tsunami-karayo’
– tsunami fellows – or beneficiaries of the ‘golden
wave’. The initial findings show that some communities are
now divided over many issues and relationships amongst neighbours,
relatives and friends have seen drastic changes in some places.
“The old harmony of the village has disappeared and in its
place, envy, greed and resentment have grown,” the report
says.
On
the issue of housing, there is consensus among people across the
board that they should be consulted and involved in the rebuilding
process. The initial feedback shows that some fear that stringent
adherence to the buffer zone policy will aggravate the challenge
of finding land for rebuilding, particularly in those districts
where land is scarce to begin with.
|