| Drama 
              over premier ad industry awards schemeWar of words continues between SLIM, advertising 
              industry
 Strong words were exchanged between the Presidents of the Sri Lanka 
              Institute of Marketing (SLIM) and the 4 A’s (Accredited Advertising 
              Agencies Association of Sri Lanka) last week as the dispute grew 
              between the ad industry and SLIM over the annual advertising awards.
  SLIM 
              rejected a call by the 4 A’s and the IAA (International Advertising 
              Association) to withdraw from the next SLIM awards and announced 
              it was going ahead with the 17th annual event on March 4, 2006. 
              The two industry bodies are piqued that SLIM has refused to accept 
              all its proposals for major reforms to the event and have now withdrawn 
              from participation.  The 
              war of words however, continued this week. 4As President Kenneth 
              Honter sent an equally strong reply to Nishan Navaratne, SLIM President, 
              after the latter’s December 23 letter to Honter said: “This 
              is the SLIM Ad Awards and it is not the Burnett or McCann Ad Awards’. 
              It will remain this way to uphold the integrity and SLIM will not 
              compromise on this. Your decision to hoodwink your member agencies 
              not to participate based on false accusations and pressure from 
              other associations may result in the cancellation of the awards 
              show and we have lost total credibility of your institution’s 
              ability to represent your member agencies. Therefore we wish to 
              exit from our MOU with immediate effect.”  The 
              reference to Burnett and McCann was because Honter works at Minds, 
              part of the Grant McCann group, while IAA President Ranil de Silva 
              is at Leo Burnett. Honter, in his December 27 letter to the SLIM 
              President, accused the latter of continuing to attempt to create 
              dissention within the ad industry. He said Navaratne had also tried 
              to intentionally marginalize all non 4A’s members by restricting 
              the SLIM awards to 4A’s agencies only.  Responding 
              to an accusation that he (Honter) was not present at one of the 
              meeting between SLIM and the 4As, Honter said the meeting referred 
              to was more than well represented by the 4 As Board -- Keith Martenstyn 
              1st Vice President, Laila Gunesekera 2nd Vice President, Dilith 
              Jayaweera Honorary Secretary and Rohan Rajaratnam the Immediate 
              Past President “while sadly the Board of SLIM was represented 
              by only Lewie Diasz and yourself.”Honter said not a single clause in the MOU (between SLIM and the 
              4As) has been adhered to in the last two years by SLIM, despite 
              numerous attempts by 4A’s to enforce it.
 In 
              his letter, Navaratne regretted 4As non participation at the annual 
              awards saying “your industry will be at the receiving end 
              with the decision you have taken to not participate in the awards 
              show.”  In 
              a separate letter to members of the 4As, its president said the 
              reason to seek reforms to the SLIM awards was based on the phenomenal 
              improvement in creativity in regional markets, such as Vietnam, 
              Thailand, Cambodia and now China in a short span of time.  “We 
              asked for a meeting along with the IAA. It was turned down. We sent 
              two joint letters that took ages to be replied, the delay which 
              we believe now was premeditated and planned. We met with SLIM at 
              the one and only official meeting that was held and your Association 
              was well represented by the most senior 4 Board members, though 
              SLIM responded with just two Board members.”  Honter 
              said all the reforms were suggested in a written document were commented 
              on just 24 hours prior to “an announced Agency Briefing. A 
              cavalier attitude that clearly reflected the stance that SLIM had 
              chosen. The manner in which all this was done left us with no doubt 
              that the intentions were not genuine, that SLIM was not really concerned 
              about the Industry. We would once again, pay for our entries, pay 
              to witness the event, pay for the social, develop the campaign, 
              sometimes done free of charge, organise the event and after all 
              that, the Industry would not benefit, either professionally or financially.  How 
              could an association that was formed to safeguard the interests 
              of the industry turn a blind eye to this deliberate and transparent 
              attempt to camouflage the only objective of the SLIM Awards this 
              year; stage the annual event and rake in funds for the marketing 
              association?”  Honter 
              said the IAA is also a part of this initiative and protest and ruled 
              that this paves the way for a more united, local ad industry. The 
              4A’s and the IAA have begun to formulate an acceptable blue 
              print for an Awards show that is being planned for mid 2006, his 
              letter said. “Some of our clients are sponsors and have approached 
              the agencies for guidance on continuing the sponsorship. To 
              the best of our knowledge 3 sponsors have already informed the SLIM 
              organizing committee of their decision to withdraw their support.” 
              The 4A’s and the IAA jointly held a media conference on Friday 
              at the Barefoot Gallery to further explain its position and give 
              the industry the opportunity to clear any grey areas that may exist. |