Here
we go round the mulberry bush
By S.R. Pathiravithan
This is the perennial story in this tiny but highly volatile island.
Nothing goes without another group shouting foul, and doing everything
within their power to bring the incumbent group down. Then the latter,
through a very sympathetic wave of votes, gains power and in return
what they do is only unleash the same or worse deeds as their predecessors.
It keeps on going …..Tit for tat….pitter for patter.
In
one of the final changes in last year’s sports calendar in
the atheletics arena, the Jayaweera led AAA faction was toppled
by the (“SB”) group led by Derwin Perera. At that point
we all felt that there was a fresh breath of air and the athletic
fraternity could bring in the old glory back, forgetting the fighting
in the planes and other age old back stabbing and other misdeeds
that brought the sport into the sub level where it lies now.
Alas!
Two weeks hence we see that we are still running down the same blind
alley. The breath of fresh air now has turned sour and a new wave
of under currents has started running through.
Now
the new junta has pronounced that three leading athletes:–Susanthika
Jayasinghe, Sugath Tillekeratne and Ann Maheshi are not fit enough
to be part of the newly formed athletic “Super Pool”.
Good. If an athlete is not fit enough to occupy a berth in a given
contingent of preferred hierarchy and there are no medal hopefuls
then axe them. No problem. But, if there is a hidden agenda behind
the axing, then there is a problem.
For
instance in the pool for the forthcoming Commonwealth Games Susanthika
Jayasinghe, Ann Maheshi, the 4 x 400 runners Anuradha Cooray along
with Damayanthi Dharsha are included. Besides, there is going to
be a trial held for the Commonwealth Games in February. At that
point what would happen if the dropped athletes do better than the
incumbent athletes in the so called “Super Pool”? What
if they had just stayed this decision until the Trials were held
and the athletes who do not perform to the expected standards were
dropped?
For
instance Damayanthi Dharsha now has dropped her 400 metres event
and come on to the 200 metres event. At present she does a 23 secs
in the 200m event. The question is – is this timing good enough
to rake in a medal for Sri Lanka at the Commonwealth Games?
Though
not much publicized this same contingent which included the three
dropped players were paid an emolument of Rs.20,000 a month or more.
For instance Susanthika Jayasinghe was paid a sum of Rs. 25,000/-
plus another Rs. 10,000/- for her trainer. So this ‘paid’
super contingent seems to be nothing new to the athletes. Not only
were the athletes, even the coaches coming from the national coach
downwards were paid sums running down from Rs.15, 000 to Rs.3000
/- per month. Besides this, when the athletes did well in the Asian
Athletic championships in the year 2002 the AAA distributed a sum
of 750,000/- among the athletes and barring the year 2003 the athletes
were given varying sums of money for their respective achievements.
At
the same time it is true that during the era when the controversial
athlete S.B. Dissanayake was the minister of sports various gifts
including cars and other written and unwritten gifts were given
to athletes and these came from the state coffers and not from the
AAA coffers. However with SB moving away from the high pedestal
of athletics the generous state assistance for the sport ran dry.
Moreover,
wasn’t there a time when Rs.500/- per month was given to rural
athletes through the “Kreeda Diriya” programme. However
that episode fell apart when the respective officers who were in
charge of disbursing the allocations could not submit the necessary
bills required. Now when this second phase of that failed programme
is re-launched shortly would the AAA be able to draw up a foolproof
method of distributing the monies so that the second phase also
would not succumb to a premature death!
All
in all what we are trying to say is that changing pillows for a
headache is not the solution. One must explore where the rot set
in and attend to the root cause of the anomaly.
Like
in cricket, yes, we do have somewhat of a top group of athletes
who are performing at top level locally and internationally. But,
do we have a steady feeding point that could sustain the sport in
the future? Do we have a programme to sustain young athletes in
the periphery of jobs, accommodation etc.? They come from the backdrops
of the country and once they are in Colombo if they cannot sustain
themselves and see a future for themselves they automatically get
disheartened unless you come on the levels of Tillekeratne, Jayasinghe
and Dharsha? It is a matter of fact that every aspiring athlete
can not achieve that status, but, to have healthy competition one
must have a second and third string of competitors who are on the
verge of selection. However, if the second and the third string
cannot sustain themselves over a given period of time the entire
structure collapses and the whole episode will be back to square
one.
Now
there is no time to ponder or have ‘thamashas’ over
ill planned and trivial issues. At this juncture what we need is
action and it should be meaningful action and not one ‘god
father’ taking over from another.
|