The
mirage of rapid economic growth
The Central Bank has estimated an economic growth of 6.4 per cent
for the third quarter of last year, thereby indicating that a growth
of 6 per cent may have been achieved in 2005. The rates of growth
in the first three quarters were 6, 5.4 and 6.4 per cent, giving
an average growth of a little less than 6 per cent for the first
three quarters of last year.
The
President in his Budget speech said they were aiming at a higher
growth of 7 to 8 per cent in 2006 and then to a growth of 10 per
cent in the next few years. Such pronouncements of Finance Ministers
and Presidents are recurrent though outcomes are different. The
need to achieve these higher rates of economic growth and expectations
are trite, but efforts to provide the environment and the policy
framework for the economy to develop are insufficient.
A host
of conditions including political stability and predictability of
economic policies are needed to achieve such super rates of economic
growth.
It
is quite obviously the lack of such conditions that has been the
cause of the economy's inability to achieve rapid growth. It is
one thing to hope for and envision higher rates of growth; it is
quite another thing to achieve them. In the contemporary economic
context attaining a growth of around 5 per cent is natural to the
economy. As a former Finance Minister, Dr Sarath Amunugama said
about a year ago, you don't need a government to achieve such a
rate of growth. Irrespective of a government's policies, the economy
would of its own achieve around a 5 per cent economic growth. Pro-active
government policies and the overall conditions favourable to economic
growth are needed to propel the economy to rates of growth that
are much higher than 5 per cent.
Besides
this, the sustaining of growth at a higher rate requires the continuity
of these conditions. At times the country has been quite pleased
with rates of growth higher than its 5 per cent average. These attainments
have mostly been when the economy has recovered after a spell of
retardation. Statistically this is quite easy to achieve once the
factors that caused the dip in the economy are removed and normalcy
is achieved. It's quite another matter to add momentum to achieve
higher rates of growth and sustain the economy at a high rate of
growth.
What the South East Asian and East Asian Economies achieved was
sustained high rates of growth over two or more decades.
This
is what the Indian and Chinese economies have been achieving in
the last several years. This is what we have failed to achieve.
The average rate of economic growth in the last sixteen years (1990-
2005) has been less than 5 per cent (4.9 per cent) and in the last
six years (2000-2005), the average annual economic growth has been
only 4.3 per cent: less than the 5.2 per cent that was achieved
in the decade of the nineties. In another words the rate of economic
growth has been declining in each semi decade since 1990, while
we are continuously talking about the need to achieve much higher
rates of growth.Instead of crowing about super economic growth rates
in the future we must buckle down to developing the environment
that would be conducive to investment and growth. Such an environment
requires several basic features.
Few
of the most vital pre-requisites are: peace and security; law and
order and protection of property rights; continuity and predictability
in economic policies; a policy framework that is supportive of investment
and economic incentives for development of industry, agriculture
and services. Can we at least say we are on the road to the attainment
of these conditions? The country's preoccupations are elsewhere.
Political
conflicts have created a situation where serious solutions to national
problems have become near impossible. Fiscal discipline is abandoned,
corruption is rampant, law and order are not enforced without fear
or favour and property rights are insecure. This is not the kind
of environment in which an economy could thrive.
We
are probably heading for a dip in the economy this year especially
owing to the set back to the peace process. We can of course continue
to wax about higher economic growth rates in the future! These higher
growth rates have turned out to be a mirage, the closer we get the
more distant the dream.
|