Public
officials told to serve the ‘people’
Buddhist cleric on “come late; go early”
attitude in public sector
By Quintus Perera
At a public event chaired by President Mahinda Rajapaksa where public
sector officials were briefed on the performance and best practices
of public enterprises, a Buddhist monk opened the session with religious
observances, and made a salient point on “time and service
to the people.”
Ven
Atthipujya Kollupitiye Mahinda Sangharakkitha, Viharadhipathi of
the Kelaniya Rajamaha Viharaya said while time is important according
to Lord Buddha’s teaching more than time, service to the people
is more important.
“Public
officers neither understood time management nor service (to the
nation) as the common practice in the public sector has been ‘come
late and go early’,” he said at the Executive Seminar
on “Public Enterprises: Performance Governance and Best Practices;
Strategies for Success” held at the BMICH last week, organized
by the Ministry of Skills Development and Public Enterprises Reforms
and Public Enterprises Reforms Commission (PERC).
Some 1,500 public officers attached to government enterprising bodies
were addressed by President Mahinda Rajapaksa on “Public Enterprises
and Mahinda Chintana” and a host of other officials.
It
was meant to guide these public officers on how the public enterprises
should be run at a profit and efficiency maintaining the desired
service to the public. It also spelled out the new responsibility
of PERC switching from as an institute privatizing public enterprises
to a reformer -- avoiding privatization.
Treasury Secretary Dr P. B. Jayasundara, in a detailed presentation
on public enterprises and the need to strengthen them, especially
state owned banks, said the Treasury was carrying a massive burden
of Rs 50 billion of unpaid bills such as taxation, electricity,
EPF and unpaid salaries from various public enterprises.
He
said the direct burden on the government is Rs 20 billion this year
and out of that Rs 19 billion came from four enterprises –
railway, postal, transport and electricity.
Divesting
began in 1985 but since 2004 privatization was stopped and now authorities
were looking at reforming these institutions to suit the market
economy while providing the desired services and also providing
public accountability and transparency. Dr Jayasundera said the
way state owned banks conducted their affairs profitably and efficiently
has proved that reforming these institutions could be carried out
successfully.
President
Rajapaksa said the people have given him a mandate to be the care-taker
of the nation and once he accomplishes his mission, protecting the
people’s expectations and according to people’s wishes
he would step down, leaving behind a legacy for the future generations
of this country to enjoy.
“I am accountable to the people,” he said adding that
he didn’t think that the remedy to loss-making public enterprises
is privatization and strongly advocated that there should be a meaningful
attitudinal change towards the whole concept of public service in
eradicating corruption and inefficiency.
In
these changes, the government would introduce competitions to select
the best public enterprise and best Chairman and in the same way
proposed to introduce a scheme to find the worst Public Enterprise
and its Head.
Sripathi Suriyaarachchi, Minister of Skills Development and Public
Enterprise Reforms said that due to the shortcomings, corruption
and inefficiency of public enterprises they are labelled in such
manner.
The
seminar appeared to be a futile effort to steer public officers
to work better. Two speakers -- Guy de Fontgalland, President, Aquinas
South Asian Regional Institute of Management and International Advisor
to Entrepreneurship Development Institute ofIndia and Dr Mukesh
Aghi, President of Universitas 21 Global, were asked to speak at
the last session due to insufficient time allocation. Only one third
of the public officers who attended the whole event, were around
for these presentations.
The
seminar – on time management and service to the nation --
started more than one hour late and after the address by the President
followed by the tea break at 12.30 pm around half the participants
left. After lunch, the numbers further reduced.
Fontgalland
said private or public enterprises should operate within the parameters
of profitability and viability indicting that those run without
profits suck resources that could be used in profit making ventures.
He
said in Singapore, which has moved to a first world, developed country
from a third world country, the majority of the enterprises are
public-owned. Some of these owned and operated by the government
such are telecommunications, Sembawang Shipyard, Singapore Airlines,
Development Bank of Singapore, Housing Development Board, Singapore
Government Investment Corporation, Intraco, National University,
etc. All these are highly profitable, viable, transparent and accountable.
He
said in Sri Lanka, public enterprises should become Trust Corporations
with the 20 million population becoming their unregistered stake-holders
with the objective of providing products and services at fair prices.
He
said that public confidence should be built on corporate governance
with accountability, transparency, efficiency, management change,
innovation and all factors which ensure a healthy corporation capable
of sustained profits.
During the question time, several members of the audience pointed
out the futility of this seminar as the most important part of seminars
are attended by a few officials. It was also pointed out that the
entire Bauddhaloka Mawatha was jammed with luxury vehicles of public
officials leading to BMICH prompting the moderator of the final
sesson, P. H.G. Premasiri, Secretary to the Ministry of Skills Development
and Public Enterprise Reforms, to say that the Treasury had indicated
that there are vehicles in excess of the requirements of the country.
An
irate public officer who did not want to be identified told The
Sunday Times FT that spending massive public funds on this type
of seminars is a national crime and said that there should be a
system to obtain feed-back on such seminars to find out whether
the desired purpose is achieved. He said that he felt that a colossal
number of public services hours were lost by attending these meetings.
|