Widening
gap between the rich and the poor
By Dinesh Ranasinghe
Today many talk about achieving an eight percent economic growth,
but they do not emphasize the equality of distribution of that growth
or income amongst the population. It is preferred to have higher
development and lesser inequality than concentrated deveopment,
which would make the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Our
nation boasts about surpassing the per capita income of Rs.100,000
per year and being recognized as a not-so poor country, this figure
is merely a calculation arrived by dividing the national income
by the population.
They should note that the lowest incoming earning 20% of our population
only gets 3.6% of the total national income, whilst the top income
earning 20% segment enjoys more than 55% of the national income.
Therefore,
it is clear that per capita GDP may be a distorted concept if viewed
in isolation. Also it is believed in the rural areas, where the
development and economic activity is less, the situation is worse
with many earning a bare minimum, which is not even sufficient to
survive.
Economic
growth is the growth in sectors like agriculture, industry and services.
However, the prosperity in these sectors itself doesn’t constitute
economic development and equality. Economic development is a much
broader term which encompasses certain other factors such as quality
of life in terms of ability and access to satisfy basic needs, income
distribution, education and many more other than economic growth
per-se. In recent years though many international organizations
praise our efforts despite the civil war and the tsunami, our World
Human Development Rank has been hovering around the nineties despite
higher per capita income, which indicates the deteriorating/stagnant
quality of life of the majority of people due to incomd constraints.
Recently
it was reported that a single parent (a mother) working in a garments
factory had been apprehended breaking into a neighboring grocery.
Her intension was to steal milk powder and a few essentials for
her and her newborn baby.
When
questioned she said the burden of escalating prices forced her into
crime. Such social crises are not the first to happen in Sri Lanka,
which takes place within the framework of a serious political and
economic crisis where the poor become poorer. Likewise, the worst
consequence is the deteriorating lives of people igniting social
unrest and uprisings. To counter this, policies should be drafted
to close the gap between the rich and the poor and develop rural
economies and secure earnings of the poor.
As
an initiative Mahinda Chinthanaya should be commended, but the implementation/effects
are yet to be seen. The Sri Lankan leadership has recognized the
need for rural development and equality, but the incapability to
act quickly, efficiently in a responsible manner as the present
time require, may see the country as a land of the poor and the
frustrated.
|