Commercial
Bank AGM rescheduled for Thursday
The Commercial Bank annual general meeting last Thursday was postponed
by a week due to a quorum issue, but not before a shareholder questioned
the legality of two of DFCC’s directors serving on the board.
K.C.
Vignarajah, a shareholder said that since the courts had restrained
the Distilleries Corporation (DCSL) and Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation
(SLIC), together with related parties including DFCC limiting their
voting rights to 10 percent in total, Commercial Bank Article 74
stipulates that a shareholder can nominate a director only if he
maintains the shareholding of not less than 12 percent of the issued
and outstanding voting shares.
“Therefore
it would only be correct if the two nominee directors of DFCC resign
forthwith,” he told The Sunday Times FT on the sidelines of
the AGM.
“The character of DFCC has drastically changed from that of
a state-controlled development corporation at its inception, to
a privately controlled, intensely competitive bank, with interests
directly conflicting with those of Commercial Bank. Therefore the
DFCC nominee directors should not continue to act in contempt of
all decent principles by remaining on the Board,” he said.
He further pointed out that National Asset Management Limited (NAMAL)
which is a public deposit taking company under the control of DFCC,
has sold a controlling interest to its indirect controller, Milford
Investments.
“That
is a tremendous let down to the investors of DFCC as well as NAMAL
and a similar fate could have befallen Commercial Bank, if DFCC
and related parties took control,” he said. The employees
of the bank who gathered at the AGM in numbers, expected the meeting
to be short due to the lack of quorum because of the provincial
council elections on the same day of the meeting.
For
a meeting to be conducted shareholders controlling a minimum 50
percent of the company should be present which has become a problem
due to the dispute over Mr Jayawardene’s stake.
It
was announced by the Chairman of Commercial Bank, Mahendra Amarasuriya
that the next meeting would be held this Thursday ‘at the
same time, same venue and will need only 30 percent of the shareholding
to be present, to hold the AGM’.
Mr
Amarasuriya came up against former majority shareholder Harry Jayawardena,
who moved a resolution through an extra ordinary general meeting
to oust him last year which failed when the Appeal Court ruled against
his excessive shareholding of more than 10 percent. Also there was
an issue of shareholders not being notified 21 days prior to the
EGM of the change of venue.
Some
employees said that they are trying to get an employee representative
to the director board. Vignarajah echoing this comment said it would
be good to have one or two employee directors with a definite stipulation
of minimum shareholding, sufficient to retain equity interest on
their own. “The Employee Share Options (ESOP) scheme should
help,” he said.
|