‘Country
is not conducive for filmmakers’- Handagama
By Susitha R. Fernando
Controversial filmmaker Ashoka Handagama complained that since the
recent past, a situation had been created that was not conducive
for filmmakers, who have been addressing politically sensitive issues
through the medium of their films.
Mr.
Handagama was referring to the circumstances which forced him to
look for a circuit to release his latest direction ‘Aksharaya"
(The letter of fire).
He claimed that after the Public Performance Board (PPB) had passed
his film to be released with the adults only tag there was a delay
in releasing his copy to him.
‘Corporation
authorities unnecessarily held back the release of the print and
the certificate. This was on the grounds that although the censor
board had approved the film there were certain procedures to be
followed before releasing the film. The NFC wanted to re-check whether
it was the same print that the PPB or the Censor Board viewed and
subsequently approved. Finally I was informed that the print of
the film would be kept under the custody of the NFC until the secretary
to the cultural ministry sees and approves it.
The
reason cited was that they had received information that the film
was not in keeping with the cultural policy of the government,"
Handagama said.
The filmmaker who was well known for his earlier films "Me
Mage Sandai" (This is my moon) and "Thani Thanuwen Piyabanna"
(Flying with one wing) argued that the film 'Aksharaya' was his
private property, and the NFC had no right to show it to anybody
without his consent.
"I
submitted the print to the NFC and obtained clearance from the Censor
Board, and they have approved it, so I don't want any other party
to see the movie." ‘Despite my objection the NFC refused
to release the film and informed that the Corporation has the authority
to hold the print. I made a complaint at the Cinnamon Gardens police
station and in the meantime the film was later released" Mr.
Handagama said.
However
Handagama now claimed the biggest challenge facing him is to a circuit
to release his film. "After meeting so many challenges the
film cannot be screened to the public as the circuit owners are
reluctant to release our films despite the fact it had attracted
a considerable audience" the filmmaker stated.
"Releasing
this film is not a commercial project but a social and political
one" he added. No other commercial distributor, under the prevailing
fearful conditions would come forward to accept the challenge. "Consequently
finding a person or a company to distribute my new film has become
a difficult task. It is only by successfully releasing one of this
type of movies which is rich both in cinematic form and content,
that we can break the barrier," he said.
Veteran
filmmaker and critic, former chairman of the National Film Corporation,
Mr. Tissa Abeysekara writing about the film stated that the film
"Letter of Fire" is a radical statement, a cruel blade,
which rips open the dark belly of our moral façade to lay
bare the stinking mess within....a bold and an honest film and I
would raise both my hands in homage to the brave young men and women
who had the courage to make it. They shake a collective fist of
defiance at the social, political, and the critical establishment
of our country."
Mr. Handagama said that he would request the film corporation circuit
to release his film as director Handagama has not been successful
in obtaining a private circuit prepared to accommodate his request.
When
asked about this from the NFC Chairman Ashoka Serasinghe said that
the delay was few hours and no any incident took place. "This
was due to a mistake by the Public Performance Board which delayed
to release the film copy", Mr. Serasinghe said. He said that
censorship takes place through the NFC where the film dealer hand
over the copy to the corporation which in return handover it to
PPB. "And once the film was passed by the PPB, it hand us over
the copy and the certificate but there was a delay in this procedure
which in turn delayed releasing the copy to Mr. Handagama"
NFC Chairman said.
Mr.
Serasinghe said that Ministry secretary previewing a film does not
come under his purview and the Ministry is superior to him. However
he said the PPB comes under the Minister and the secretary has the
power to see the film when it is in the custody of the PPB. "Censorship
is the duty of the Minister and the Minister had delegated that
power to the PPB. If the Minister is not satisfied with PPB's version
he can asked the board not to release the film until he sees it.
And later on Minister can take a decision. ‘Censorship is
in the control of the Minister," the NFC Chairman said.
|