Government
withdraws fertilizer subsidies from private sector
New blow to Lankan tea industry
Sri Lanka’s tea industry was dealt a severe blow earlier this
month when the government withdrew the fertilizer subsidy –
which the industry has enjoyed for over two decades – on all
agriculture produce except paddy.
The
Ministry of Agriculture Development in an April 6 letter to fertilizer
importers said the subsidy would henceforth be confined only to
the paddy sector. “The provision of fertilizer at subsidised
prices to the paddy sector and distribution will come under the
purview of the two state fertilizer companies with immediate effect,”
the letter said.
This
means that tea, rubber, coconut and vegetables will not enjoy the
subsidy given since the 1980s. The paddy sector consumes 65% of
the subsidised fertilizer, with 20% taken by tea and the balance
shared by the other sectors.
The
April 6 decision also means private sector fertilizer importers
– CIC, McLarens, Baurs, ETA Lanka, Hayleys and Agstar –
get shut out of the paddy sector unless some “rich”
farmers are prepared to buy unsubsidized urea which has gone up
to around Rs 36,000 per tonne from a subsidized Rs 10,500.
“We appealed to Treasury Secretary Dr. P.B. Jayasundera at
a meeting but he said the government cannot anymore subsidize the
private sector,” said Malin Gunatillake, Secretary-General
of the Planters Association.
“In
all tea producing countries, and Europe and the US, subsidies are
provided to agriculture whether state or private enterprises,”
he said, noting that the policy was out of line with other agriculture
producing countries. Senior treasury officials were not immediately
available for contact.
Gamini
Munasinghe, Director at the National Fertilizer Secretariat, which
together with state-owned Colombo Commercial Fertilizer Ltd will
handle the paddy sector in future, confirmed the new policy decision.
He said the two institutions would import fertilizer and continue
to sell it at subsidised rates to paddy farmers.
While
the tea sector is enjoying good prices in recent months, the fertilizer
blow comes on top of other added costs to producers like the removal
of the VAT exemption last year and rising electricity and transportation
costs. Negotiation of a fresh collective agreement on wages is also
due in June with unions and would add to the costs of plantation
companies.
The
Sunday Times FT was unable to reach tea smallholder associations
for comment on the withdrawal of the subsidy. But it learnt that
small producers are worried over the impact and have complained
to local parliamentarians for relief on this issue. Some 65 percent
of Sri Lanka’s tea comes from low and mid-grown smallholders,
with the balance coming from plantation companies.
Private fertilizer importers, dismayed by the decision, said that
more than 75 percent of the imports have been handled by the private
sector due to the inefficiencies of the state sector agencies. They
said the government also owes the six importers some one billion
rupees in subsidy payments for the last Maha season and a state
audit of their stocks was underway for payments to be made.
The Impact
*
Production costs seen going go up by 70-80 %.
* Fertilizer bill to companies expected to rise by between Rs
60 to Rs 100 million.
* Yields could drop if fertilizer use is reduced to cut on costs.
* Leaf quality could be affected.
* Plantation companies are paying Rs 40-50 million more this year
due to the removal of the VAT exemption in 2005.
* Plantation companies having both tea and rubber will be cushioned
by the blow as rubber is enjoyed record price levels.
* Rising electricity and fuel prices would raise COP.
|