UN sees Lanka and Lebanon differently
The United Nations Secretary General’s spokesman
said on Friday that the peacekeeping in Lebanon and the ceasefire
monitoring in Sri Lanka were two different issues that could not
be compared.
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric was responding to
questions from a journalist at the United Nations in New York.
The transcript of the Q&A is as follows:
Question: I have a question that starts with Sri
Lanka and ends up in Lebanon. Now, there’s an announcement
that the Swedish Head of the outgoing Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission,
Brigadier Ulf Henricsson, slams the European Union for listing the
Tamil Tiger rebels in Sri Lanka as terrorists. Now, because of this,
the Swedish, Finnish and Danish members of the Mission are leaving.
But, Norwegians and Icelanders, who are not part of the European
Union, are staying. Now, with this in mind, can we look forward
to something like that -- that if a country has declared Hezbollah
“terrorists”, they will not be allowed to be on the
Force? How does the 38th Floor look on the Sri Lanka situation,
and how does it reflect on Lebanon?
UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric: They are two separate…
Question: I know they are different.
Spokesman: It’s exactly that. They’re
different.
Question: But, the implication is there.
Spokesman: I’m not going to go into this.
I’m not going to follow into your line of questioning. The
United Nations Force is operating under a mandate, unanimously voted
by the Security Council, to push -- to strengthen -- the Lebanese
Government to implement [resolutions] 1701, 1559. Everyone knows
the parameters. We will seek the support of the international community.
Question: What was the mandate for Sri Lanka?
That was my question.
Spokesman: It is not a United Nations mandate.
|