Senior
Govt. officials questioned over SLIC privatization
By Natasha Gunaratne
Nearly 40 persons, including Treasury Secretary P.B. Jayasundara,
have been questioned by a parliamentary sub-committee over the controversial
privatization of the Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation (SLIC). The
meeting by the parliamentary probe committee lasted several hours
and officials from accounting firms Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers
neither admitted nor confirmed whether their accounts were in accordance
with international accounting standards since current assets and
currents liabilities had not been disclosed, sources close to the
committee said.
Among those – in addition to Dr Jayasundera
(questioned for the second time) -- who appeared before the subcommittee
were PERC Chairman W.M. Bandusena, former PERC Chairman Chrysantha
Perera, former Treasury Secretary Charitha Ratwatte and former Treasury
official Faiz Mohideen.
Parliamentarian Ravi Karunanayake, a member of
the COPE sub committee, told The Sunday Times the individuals who
were questioned had still not provided sufficient or adequate explanations
and would therefore be called to appear before the subcommittee
again on Tuesday. He said past attempts at questioning these officials
had yielded unsatisfactory responses.
However, sources said the subcommittee was investigating the matter
very deeply and wanted to get ‘to the bottom of it.”
Simultaneously, the ethics committee of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Sri Lanka (ICASL) has conducted its own investigation
on the two auditing firms.
The ethics committee has issued its report and
decided to recommend to the Council of the ICASL that a disciplinary
committee be appointed, informed sources said. They said both firms
could face a two-year suspension if they were found culpable. “Ernst
& Young were the auditors for the government up to the date
of the SLIC privatization and PricewaterhouseCoopers were consultants
to the government and therefore, should have protected the government's
interest.
“The findings of the ICASL ethics committee
inquiry would reveal a lot to the COPE inquiry. Since both committees
are conducting similar investigations, they should use the resources
of one to streamline and fast track their inquiry,” one source
said.
|