By Sandun Jayawardana   The perennial issue of laws delays again came to the surface yesterday (2) as Parliament debated the head of expenditure of the Ministry of Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms. Addressing Parliament, Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe revealed that there were 1,104,458 cases being heard in courts throughout the country as at June [...]

Columns

Focus on laws delays during debate on Justice Ministry vote

View(s):

By Sandun Jayawardana  

The perennial issue of laws delays again came to the surface yesterday (2) as Parliament debated the head of expenditure of the Ministry of Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms.

Addressing Parliament, Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe revealed that there were 1,104,458 cases being heard in courts throughout the country as at June 30 this year. All these cases are being heard by 429 judges. Though the number of Justices in both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal were increased under the 20th Amendment to the Constitution, it must be acknowledged that the number of cases that have been resolved has not increased in comparison to the increase in the number of judges in the Superior Courts, said Minister Rajapakshe. The COVID-19 pandemic and the civil unrest experienced last year also played a part in delaying cases from being dealt with speedily, he added.  

The Attorney General’s Department meanwhile, is currently handling about 40, 000 cases with a limited number of staff, he noted. Meanwhile, as at September 30 this year total of 1167 court cases regarding child abuse have been concluded while 1527 cases are still pending in court, he told Parliament.

Minister Rajapakshe also acknowledged the delays in the Government Analyst’s Department. The pandemic period and the economic crisis also impacted the department, with them finding it difficult to purchase certain chemicals needed for their work. Some chemicals were not available in the market during the pandemic. Though that problem has been sorted out, other issues remain, he further said.

The Government Analyst’s Department had received 10, 491 suspected drug samples for testing as at end of October this year. The department has to spend at least Rs. 20, 000 to test one sample. Out of the samples sent in 2023, 1477 did not contain any drugs, the minister revealed. Out of 20, 257 samples received from 2022 to August 15, 2023, a staggering 7.3% did not contain any drugs. Out of 8351 suspected heroin samples received in 2023, 790 or 9.5% did not contain drugs. “This is a very serious issue. Suspects are kept in remand custody until results from these samples come back. We are not sure whether the police are doing this deliberately or whether they are genuinely under the impression that these samples contain drugs. It could even be that the samples have been changed while being sent for testing. I have asked both the Inspector General of Police and the Minister of Public Security to investigate this matter,” said Mr Rajapakshe.

He revealed that tests on 5505 samples at the Government Analyst’s Department have been pending for more than three months while 2011 had been pending for more than six months. This comes to 7516 samples in total. More than 27, 000 inmates, both prisoners and remand suspects, are currently in prison. Given the delays in tests at the Government Analyst’s Department, 5000 to 6000 of that prison population could be spending time in prison due to those delays. “We have taken steps to complete these tests and release the results within three months,” he told the House.

Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) MP Thalatha Atukorale meanwhile, drew attention to what she called the increasing politicization of the judiciary, which she noted was not a good trend.

When it comes to making appointments to the Superior Courts, the Constitutional Council (CC) should be given more responsibility and it should not act as a rubber stamp, she further said.

Ms Atukorale, a former Justice Minister, also pointed out that there are many complaints against some judges but the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has been slow to act on these complaints. Some courts meanwhile, flout circulars issued by the JSC regarding the administration of courts. She urged the minister to look raise these matters with the JSC.

Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP M.A. Sumanthiran pointed out that Pastor Jerome Fernando has been arrested and remanded under the ICCPR Act while Ven. Ampitiye Sumanarathana Thera from Batticaloa who had openly made comments about “cutting Tamils to pieces” continues to remain free and is considered above the law, said the MP.

“This is the curse of this country and I think the Minister of Justice must be ashamed to call himself the Minister of Justice when there is no justice,” said Mr Sumanthiran, adding that “blatant discrimination is apparent.”

“The problem is that the trust that people have in the organs of the State have now deteriorated to a critical level,” National People’s Power MP Dr. Harini Amarasuriya said.

She claimed that there’s a pattern regarding Bills that are coming before the legislature where priority has been given to those Bills that seek to suppress the voice and freedoms of the people. The Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) continues to be applied even though this government declared a moratorium on it. Meanwhile, Counter Terrorism Act which the government put forward as a replacement to the PTA and later backtracked on after being challenged is now being presented again almost as the same Bill. The Online Safety Bill and others like it are also being presented. “It seems as if the main mandate of the government in power is to somehow remain in power at all costs,” said Dr. Amarasuriya.

Other heads of expenditure that were debated and passed this week include the heads of expenditure of the Ministries of Public Administration, Home Affairs, Provincial Councils & Local Government, Transport and Highways, Urban Development and Housing, Health, Industries, Trade, Commerce and Food Security.

The committee stage debate of Budget 2024 continues next week.

Uproar over one month suspension of 3 MPs involved in parliament lobby brawl

There was uproar in Parliament yesterday as the House voted in favour of implementing the recommendations of Committee on Ethics and Privileges to suspend three MPs involved in a brawl in Parliamentary Lobby for a one month period.

State Minister Diana Gamage, along with Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) MPs Sujith Sanjaya Perera and Rohana Bandara were accordingly suspended from attending Parliament sittings for one month from yesterday. The three were punished over the much publicised confrontation that took place in Parliament’s Lobby on October 20.  

The motion came to a vote after SJB MPs vehemently protested over the decision by the Ethics and Privileges Committee to suspend all three MPs for one month when the special committee that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena had appointed to probe the matter had recommended vastly different penalties.

The special committee, which was headed by Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakshe, had unanimously recommended that State Minister Gamage be suspended for three months. A majority of the Committee had decided that MP Sujith Sanjaya Perera should be issued a stern warning by the Speaker for his reaction during the confrontation while MP Rohana Bandara, who had shared video of the incident on social media, should be suspended for two weeks.

The Parliamentary Committee on Ethics and Privileges chaired by former Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa however, had recommended that all three Members be suspended for one month. SJB MPs were livid over the change, and accused the government of misusing its majority on the Committee on Ethics and Privileges to disregard the recommendations of the Deputy Speaker’s committee and suspend all three MPs for one month; effectively reducing the punishment given to State Minister Gamage and increasing the punishments for MPs Perera and Bandara.

When the motion was presented to Parliament last morning, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena announced that the suspension would come into force with immediate effect. Opposition SJB members strongly objected to the move prompting the Speaker to call for a vote.

Fifty-seven MPs voted in favour of the motion while three Members abstained and one Member voted against. SJB MPs though, walked out of the Chamber at the time of the vote.

Share This Post

WhatsappDeliciousDiggGoogleStumbleuponRedditTechnoratiYahooBloggerMyspaceRSS

Buying or selling electronics has never been easier with the help of Hitad.lk! We, at Hitad.lk, hear your needs and endeavour to provide you with the perfect listings of electronics; because we have listings for nearly anything! Search for your favourite electronic items for sale on Hitad.lk today!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
Comments should be within 80 words. *

*

Post Comment

Advertising Rates

Please contact the advertising office on 011 - 2479521 for the advertising rates.