News
Govt. responds to UN Special Rapporteurs’ concerns over Online Safety Act
View(s):By Namini Wijedasa
The Government has responded to serious concerns raised by three UN Special Rapporteurs about its new Online Safety Act (OSA) by stating that the law is aimed at addressing internet crimes against women and children and not for the purpose of restricting the fundamental rights of the citizen.
“It is not the objective of the Act to restrict fundamental rights guaranteed to the people by the Constitution of Sri Lanka including the freedom of opinion and expression and freedom of peaceful assembly and of association…,” says a letter sent last week to the Special Procedures Branch of the UN Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights by Sri Lanka’s Permanent Mission to the UN in Geneva.
An alarming growth in crimes committed using digital technology and online platforms has necessitated the strengthening of measures to safeguard individual and societal rights, it states: “Several international instruments and fora have recognised the need for States to take appropriate action in this regard.”
“In 2023, over 8,000 complaints were received regarding crimes committed using the internet and over 100,000 nude photographs of Sri Lankan women and children were circulated on social media,” the letter continues. “The Online Safety Bill passed by the Parliament of Sri Lanka on 24th January 2024 is aimed at addressing this issue of growing public importance and thereby to protect the vulnerable sections of society in line with international standards.”
In November last year, three UN Special Rapporteurs wrote to the Sri Lankan government stating that certain provisions of the Online Safety Bill (OSB)–it wasn’t passed then–and the Broadcasting Regulatory Commission Act (BRCA) “may not meet the requirements of international law and standards”.
They encouraged the withdrawal, public consultation and substantial review of key aspects of both bills to ensure that the adopted legislation complied with Sri Lanka’s international human rights obligations.
The Special Rapporteurs on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, and on the right to privacy warned of “potential violations of the rights to privacy, freedom of opinion and expression, and freedom of peaceful assembly and of association”.
Sri Lanka’s Permanent Mission has countered that the OSB was passed in compliance with Constitutional procedure, and was challenged in the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka which proposed certain amendments to be incorporated into the Bill before it was passed by Parliament. This was duly done, it states.
“The Hon. Attorney General has clarified to the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka that all the amendments made during the Committee Stage of the Online Safety Bill have been in accordance with the provisions contained in the Constitution and the specific directions contained in the determination of the Supreme Court,” it states.
Further amendments are being drafted after “extensive consultations” with interested parties and stakeholders. “These included local institutions, civil society representatives and international stakeholders including the UN and the Internet Coalition,” the letter said.
As for the BRCA, “it is still in the process of being formulated and yet to be published in the Government Gazette, it is noted that the comments by the Special Procedure Mandate Holders (SPMHs) appears [sic] to be based on a document that has not formally been issued by the Government of Sri Lanka”.
| Experts group warns no laws to define child sex abuse material Last year, a high-level group convened by President Ranil Wickremesinghe to study the serious spike in online violence against children and make recommendations for protection, presented its report. “The Committee Appointed to Study and Make Recommendations for the Protection of Children” warned that there are no laws in Sri Lanka to explicitly define child sex abuse material. Child protection experts have also pointed out that the Obscene Publications Act, the Vagrants Ordinance or the Penal Code–all of which contain provisions on pornography–are not precise enough. The committee also maintained that the OSB did not introduce adequate measures to combat child sexual abuse material and other harmful online content for children. And it did not have any safeguards for children who have been victims of online violence. Public Security Minister Tiran Alles, whose ministry is the mover of the OSA, told the Sunday Times that Cabinet-approved amendments to the Act are being still finalised by the Legal Draftsman’s Department. Many analysts have said these changes are backed by the internet companies and benefit only the internet intermediaries, not the citizenry. But no other proposed changes have been taken into consideration. And this week, Minister Alles confirmed that he has not even seen the report of the committee appointed by the President to make recommendations regarding the online safety of children. “I will check on that,” he said. “I’m not sure what you are referring to.” Apart from pushing for a regulatory mechanism, the Committee calls for legislation that accurately defines child sexual abuse material. It recommends action against anyone that produces such content for the purpose of its distribution through a computer system; offers or makes available the content through a computer system; distributes or transmits it through a computer system; procures child sexual abuse material through a computer system for oneself or another person; and possesses the content in a computer system or on a computer-data storage medium. The report has recommended a range of other amendments. | |
The best way to say that you found the home of your dreams is by finding it on Hitad.lk. We have listings for apartments for sale or rent in Sri Lanka, no matter what locale you're looking for! Whether you live in Colombo, Galle, Kandy, Matara, Jaffna and more - we've got them all!