The pressure to 'create' employment
While Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has called upon the private sector to take urgent action to create jobs and reduce the ranks of the unemployed, companies face the problem of finding the right people to fill existing vacancies and of having to close down inefficient production units, throwing people out of work. The government has not been able to create enough employment despite its election promise to do so and seems to be getting worried that unfulfilled pledges such as this would come back to haunt it at the next poll.

The government is giving mixed signals to the private sector. It cannot simply expect the private sector to wave a magic wand and create jobs overnight at any cost, just for the sake of giving employment to people who in all probability will be government supporters, and still expect businesses to run efficiently. On the one hand the government is urging the private sector to improve productivity and be efficient and compete effectively against the competition in overseas markets. On the other hand it wants the private sector to stuff their companies with unemployed youth so that it can claim to have made some progress in solving the unemployment problem.

The bald fact is that the ruling party is getting desperate - it cannot manufacture jobs in the government sector like it used to because of pressure and conditions imposed by foreign aid donors. Although even here there are exceptions, one being Lake House where insiders say even though the institution is heavily overstaffed new recruits are still being hired. The UNP has now come up with the neat trick of getting the private sector, possibly those corporates and business leaders who openly identify with the ruling party, to artificially create jobs. This is simply not how things work in a market economy.

Some industrialists feel that the focus should be on saving existing jobs instead of twisting the arm of the private sector to artificially create new ones. They say that dozens of factories have crashed in recent months putting scores of people out of work. Others are under liquidation. Labour unions and opposition parties have been making a lot of noise about these closures recently.

The main problem is that the unemployed youth are simply not employable, at least not in the kind of corporate culture and work environment created by the opening up of the economy and the enthronement of market capitalism as the dominant ideology.

For instance, more than 100,000 youth who fail their GCE Ordinary Level examination enter the job market annually but cannot be employed because they do not have the required skills, a key one being an adequate command of English. A cursory glance at the employment ads in the newspapers is enough to reveal that there seems to be plenty of jobs available. It has long been known that the private sector has been struggling to find recruits with a good command of English which is an essential skill in the corporate world. There is also a perception in the private sector that the numerous vocational training schools in existence are not performing the right way and providing unemployed youth with the skills required to make them employable.

There might be a need to take a fresh look at these organisations and their curricula. A more 'market-driven' approach might be useful where these institutions look at the opportunities available in the job market and train youth accordingly, instead of pursuing a standard curriculum that may be long outdated.

The attitude of jobless youth is the other problem. Many unemployed youth, it is known, prefer to remain jobless while searching for white collar job rather than take up a blue-collar job. Misplaced pride seems to be one factor that helps to swell the ranks of the unemployed.


Long term economic impact of HIV/AIDS damaging
WASHINGTON, July 23 - A new World Bank research report warns that HIV/AIDS causes far greater long-term damage to national economies than previously assumed, for by killing mostly young adults, the disease is robbing the children of AIDS victims of one or both parents to love, raise and educate them, and so undermines the basis of economic growth over the long haul.

This suggests that a country like South Africa could face progressive economic collapse within several generations unless it combats its AIDS epidemic more urgently.

According to the new report - "The Long-run Economic Costs of AIDS: Theory and an Application to South Africa" - most studies of the macroeconomic costs of AIDS, as measured by reduced GDP growth rates, do not pay enough attention to the way in which human knowledge and potential are created and can be lost.

This is one of the key channels influencing long-term growth. In Africa, for example, where the epidemic has hit the hardest to date, existing estimates range between a modest decline of 0.3 and 1.5 percent in GDP growth annually. In contrast, the report argues that the costs are likely to be much higher.

"Previous estimates overlooked the impact of HIV/AIDS on children if one or both parents die, how they can suddenly become orphans, how they become vulnerable to dropping out of school, and how, in this way, the disease weakens the ability of today's generation to pass on its skills and knowledge to the next," says Shanta Devarajan, co-author of the new research findings, and Chief Economist of the World Bank's Human Development Network. "In those countries facing an HIV/AIDS epidemic on the same scale as South Africa, for example, if nothing is done quickly to fight their epidemic, they could face economic collapse within several generations, with family incomes being cut in half."

The process whereby AIDS sharply reduces economic growth, even to the point of economic collapse, brings three factors together in a particularly devastating combination.

First, AIDS selectively destroys human capital, that is, people's accumulated life experiences, their human and job skills, and their knowledge and insights built up over a period of years. It is primarily a disease of young adults. As these infected adults become progressively sick and weak, they steadily lose their ability to work. Eventually, the disease kills them in their prime, thereby destroying the human capital built up in them over the years through child-rearing, formal education, and learning on the job.

Second, AIDS weakens or even wrecks the mechanisms that generate human capital formation. In family homes, the quality of child-rearing depends heavily on the parents' human capital.

If one or, worse, both parents die while their children are still young, the transmission of knowledge and potential productive capacity across the two generations will be weakened. At the same time, the loss of income due to disability and early death reduces the lifetime resources available to the family, which may well result in the children spending much less time (if any at all) at school.

Third, the chance that the children themselves will contract the disease in adulthood makes investment in their education less attractive, even when both parents themselves remain uninfected.

With too little education and knowledge gathered from their parents, as well as being deprived of parental love and guidance throughout their childhood, the children of AIDS victims later become adults who themselves are less able to raise their own children and to invest in their education.

The process is insidious, since the effects are felt only over the long-run, as the poor education of children today translates into low adult productivity a generation later, and so on. But if nothing is done, the report warns, the outbreak of the disease will eventually precipitate economic collapse.

"Economic analysis for practical policy-making often pays too little attention to the wider economic context," says Hans Gersbach, co-author and Professor of Economics at Heidelberg University, Germany. "We have attempted to go beyond conventional reasoning where the long run effects of AIDS are concerned. The threat of a downward spiral in levels of human capital and productivity when a society is assailed by an epidemic like AIDS must be a centrepiece of a broad macroeconomic perspective."

In the early phases of the epidemic, economic damage may appear to be slight. But as the transmission of capacities and potential from one generation to the next is progressively weakened and the failure to accumulate human capital becomes more pronounced, the economy will begin to slow down, with the growing threat of collapse. This raises important social and fiscal implications for economic policy. The first is the threat of worsening inequality. If the children left orphaned are not given the care and education enjoyed by those whose parents remain uninfected, there will be increasing inequality among the next generation of adults and the families they form. Social customs of adoption and fostering, how ever well-established, may not be able to cope with the scale of the problem generated by a sharp increase in adult mortality, thereby shifting the onus onto the government. The government itself, however, is likely to experience increasing fiscal problems and so be unable to fully finance this additional task.

Second, by killing mainly young adults, AIDS seriously weakens a country's tax base, and reduces its ability to finance public expenditures, including those aimed at accumulating human capital, such as education and health services not related to AIDS.

In this way, the damaging impact of HIV/AIDS on economic growth over the longer run is intensified. As a result, national finances will come under increasing pressure. Slower economic growth means slower growth of the tax base, at the same time as governments face growing demands to treat the sick and care for orphans.

"This report confirms how important it is for policymakers to act swiftly and effectively to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS, and to treat those with the disease." says the study's co-author Clive Bell, a visiting World Bank Research Fellow, and Professor of Economics at Heidelberg University. "Keeping infected people alive and well, especially parents, so they can continue to live productive lives and take care of the next generation, is not only the compassionate thing to do, but it is also vital for a country's long-term economic future."

The Bank is active in fighting HIV/AIDS in all regions. Over the last few years, it has committed $1.6 billion in grants, loans and credits for HIV/AIDS programmes worldwide.

The Bank is especially engaged in Sub-Saharan Africa, where more than 29 million adults and children are infected with HIV/AIDS.

As of July 2003, the Bank had committed more than $800 million for HIV/AIDS programmes in 23 African countries. All of the poorest countries in Africa are on track to receive grants from the World Bank for their HIV/AIDS national programmes. Policy guidance and special initiatives are offered for middle-income African countries with high HIV prevalence, such as Swaziland and others parts of Southern Africa. In these countries, the Bank is providing implementation and technical support, and knowledge services to complement financing from the Global Fund For AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other sources.

"While there is much economic analysis that shows how costly it is to provide prevention, care and treatment to the millions that are infected and affected, there are far fewer studies that show how costly it is not to act." says Debrework Zewdie, Director of the World Bank's Global HIV/AIDS Programme . "This new study will help fill this gap, and its approach should persuade governments of the need to draw up a plan of action and act on it."


Right of reply
Call for unity among professionals
By Eddie de Zylva, Chairman, SAARC Construction Industrial Council
I refer to Mr. Sellakapu S. Upasiri de Silva's article on "Loan negotiation alone won't stop corruption" appearing in The Sunday Times FT of July 27.

In his opening paragraphs, Mr. de Silva states that some of my suggestions are within the easy reach of construction professionals and goes on to chastise such professionals. I wish to advise Mr. de Silva that my article was addressed in respect of projects undertaken in Sri Lanka which are funded by multilateral funding agencies. Also in such cases the procurement procedures are not in the hands of the construction professionals. Such systems are entirely in the hands of the funding agencies and the government bureaucrats negotiating the loan agreements. Perhaps if construction professionals were at the negotiating table, a different result, as suggested by Mr. de Silva, could have been achieved. Therefore no one should run away with Mr. de Silva's idea that the construction professionals are responsible for the procurement of contracts not being on a level playing field.

Registration of contractors
Mr. de Silva's suggestions that "all bidding procedures should be invested with the recipient of the loan by the lender" is, to say the least, wishful thinking. All funding agencies have their own procurement guidelines that must necessarily be followed when bidding procedures are developed by the borrower. It is up to the negotiators to convince the funding agencies if any deviations to such procedures are considered necessary and to get their consent. However, I repeat once again that the negotiators are not always construction professionals as assumed by Mr. de Silva.

Negotiation of loan agreementsI wish to say that I do not believe that the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other funding institution debars local consultants and contractors from tendering for projects funded by them. However, on contracts above a pre-determined threshold, pre-qualification of consultants and contractors are required. The elimination comes from this exercise. I must also advise him that the criteria for those procedures have not been prepared by ICTAD or the government of Sri Lanka, but such pre-qualifying exercises follow the criteria prescribed by the funding agencies, and it is observed that such systems are the normal international pre-qualification systems. However, I cannot but agree very much with Mr. de Silva, as I have said earlier, that most of these constraints could be overcome or at least alleviated if construction professionals could be included in the negotiations. I think the attitude of the negotiators should not be a reason for qualified technical professionals to leave the country in search of greener pastures, as stated by Mr.de Silva. I consider those as the weaker professionals or selfish ones. If more of our professionals have the country at heart, if they have some degree of patriotism and are committed to build our economy through construction, they should remain here and give of their best. Then collectively we would be closer in achieving our goals, not only for the industry but to the benefit of the entire country.

Procurement proceduresMr. de Silva's proposal that Sri Lanka should "limit the influence of lending agencies and take control of the procurement of contracts", and his suggestion that "the controlling power of all contract procurement should be vested with the government", is exactly the practice in Sri Lanka today. However, the government in doing so must, to an extent, satisfy the guidelines laid down by the lending agencies, which is a procedure not by choice but by necessity. If Mr. de Silva feels that we should accept the loans from these agencies and then tell them to mind their own business from that point onwards, on the grounds that we are paying interest, I think the ERD should use Mr. de Silva as their buffer when negotiating loans. Mr. de Silva's viewpoint on corrupt procurement practices introduced by ICTAD seems to be a blind and unsupported statement. With regard to the 30% advance payment, I do not think that foreign consultants were entitled to this and I also do not think that foreign contractors were entitled to this. This was a system not devised by ICTAD but a procedure adapted consequent to a cabinet paper which was approved as far back as 1998.

He goes on to philosophise on what should be done, what should not be done, how things could be done, the consequences of existing conditions, how conditions should be drafted to give more inputs to local contractors and consultants and so on. Such philosophies are not new. We have several armchair critics that come from various circles, but very few from those who are capable of implementing such philosophies. Mr. de Silva reflects very well the image of an army deserter in exile directing the commander of the army when to call the shots. If we are to achieve our goals we need the united effort of professionals and institutions. They need to stand together and walk together. This no doubt is a daunting task and it will be very difficult to see the light at the end of the tunnel, if strong construction professionals continue to chicken out, and leave the shores in search of greener pastures. Howeve,r I will continue to relentlessly cry the cause of the domestic construction industry loud and clear until I am no more, and that too not from down under or another part of the world but from our own Mother Sri Lank

Business editor’s note: Further correspondence on this issue is closed.


Back to Top  Back to Business  

Copyright © 2001 Wijeya Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contact us: | Editorial | | Webmaster|