Focus
on Rights
Ushering good governance and peace
By Kishali Pinto Jayawardene
For those who predicted the Ides of March, this month
has been wildly glorious given the extent of the electoral victory secured
by the United Front Government in the Local Government polls this week.
While from the standpoint of partisan politics, this jubilance is to be
expected, the month of March 2002, perhaps even more than December 2001,
should compel the People's Alliance Opposition to turn away from a painful
process of self-immolation and engage instead in some severe introspection
as to the exact reasons why the once wildly acclaimed administration of
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga could find itself so scorned. This is
crucial for if we have learnt something in the past decades, it is that
an insecure Opposition can be as damaging to the democratic process as
a paranoid Government. At a particular point in time not so long ago, we
had both. It is devoutly to be hoped that history will never repeat itself,
in this particular sense at least, in the years to come for it is doubtful
if this country would be able to withstand such an extreme crisis of self
confidence again.
Budget
boost for good governance: Finance Minister K.N. Choksy presenting the
UNF government's first budget. Pic by Gemunu Wellage
In this process of healing for the People's Alliance, there are only
two basic rules for the moment. The first is to cease talking about the
evils of previous UNP regimes, if only for the reason that the continuing
overkill engaged in by the Kumaratunga administration on this count has
now become nothing if not more than slightly silly. The second - which
is perhaps even harder - is learning all over again, how to work with democratic
structures and processes such as an independent judiciary and a critically
responsive media and not against them. The irony was that when Chandrika
Bandaranaike Kumaratunga came to power in 1994, this country had an independent
judiciary bidding fair to equal the strength of the Indian Supreme Court
at that time and a media that strongly supported the Kumaratunga administration.
The clumsy dismantling of one and the unnecessary antagonising of the other
was, in retrospect, the beginning of the end for the People's Alliance
government. And justly so, one might add.
In retrospect also, the gradual co-opting of civil society, which had
played a vital role in the changeover of government in 1994, was highly
counterproductive in that the spaces for apolitical criticism were drawn
in. Whatever criticism of the Kumaratunga administration that persisted
began to be regrettably personalised to the extent of virtual paranoia.
This, in essence, was what went so notably wrong during the past seven
years, spilling over to all areas of governance and electoral politics.
And the lessons learnt therein in how not to rule a country are imperative
not only for the Opposition but the Government as well.
For the moment however, as the Opposition engages in bandaging its electoral
wounds, the true testing time has started ticking for the United Front
Government. In this context, it was refreshing to see that this week's
Budget, part from the fiscal reliefs that it announced, also contained
provisions that were interesting from a civil society perspective. The
policy measures reiterated the importance of the press as a neutral watchdog,
reporting on the manner in which Sri Lanka's scarce public funds are utilised
and promised the abolition of the criminal defamation law. The measures
also stated that the policy of the United Front Government is to ensure
that the state media will act impartially and that the citizens of this
country will be able to obtain information on how their public finances
are being used. In addition, the policy measures promised that the concerns
of women will be better reflected in our political system and that the
Government "will consider" making specific provision for women representation
in elected bodies when the amendments to the existing electoral systems
are discussed by political parties.
While these promises added a bit of spice to the Budget, the following
months will demonstrate the effective commitment of the United Front Government
to practically ensuring that the status quo changes. As far as the media
is concerned, the overhauling of the criminal defamation law and the enacting
of the Draft Freedom of Information Law that has been proposed by the media
and civil society, is of relatively little controversy, given the long
process of lobbying that preceded this. However, the ensuring of the impartiality
of the state media would be a far more difficult task, given that the United
Front Government has, up to date, wholly avoided the idea of broadbasing
of the ownership of the Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Limited (ANCL).
In that respect, it has however, certainly been more forthright than its
predecessor in government which promised broadbasing (and in fact, appointed
a committee which recommended the same) but went on to do exactly the opposite.
At present, the relevant Law (the Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Limited
Special Provisions Law No 28 of 1973 as amended by law No 23 of 1974 and
Act No 35 of 1981) stipulates a clear statutory duty in the Minister of
Media to issue written directions to the Public Trustee for initiation
of a broadbasing process. These directions have not been issued by Ministers
of Media in successive governments for the past twenty eight years, thus
perpetrating a continuing illegal status quo regarding which nobody seems
to be much concerned about.
Equally, the guaranteeing of greater women representation in political
bodies (again a piquant addition to the Budget policy measures) requires
specific legal reform. This week's local government elections demonstrated
that despite the hype and the hoopla, the percentage amounts of women in
the new local government bodies would be as low - if not lower - than the
previous elections. Reform to the electoral laws requires therefore a specific
percentage of reserved seats for women, commencing from the local government
levels to provincial and then parliamentary levels if this country is not
to become infamous for its lack of women representation in the South Asian
sub continent. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and even Nepal far outstrip
Sri Lanka in this respect, a sad fact that ought to make our policy makers
sit up and take some notice in the first instance. Bringing back an earlier
provision in the Draft Constitution that promised some measure of representation
in nominations for women at local government elections would be highly
insufficient in this sense.
These - and others- are all issues that are underscored by the electoral
mandate given this week which while being for peace, is also, as was recently
editorialised, overwhelmingly a mandate for good governance.
To lose sight of one in reaching out for the other would only negate
the effects of both. As this country approaches the Sinhala-Tamil New Year,
this would be an appropriate time to hasten processes relating to both
- and be ruthless in dealing with an obdurate Presidency which complains
about high electoral violence yet deliberately refrains from engaging in
the processes in the setting up of an Elections Commission which might
have exercised greater control over the electoral processes than a deeply
politicised police force. These are the contradictions that bedevil the
People's Alliance.
It will be to the greater good of the country therefore if-in the event
of such contradictions continuing-that the United Front government engages
in immediate and decisive action to bring about the Constitutional Council,
by an 18th Amendment if it needs be, as a first and imperative step for
good governance, rather than allow itself to be constitutionally checkmated
in this manner.
SLMA for human rights of patients
Hundreds of doctors working together in Sri Lanka's most respected medical
professional body have committed themselves to work towards the goal of
restoring the welfare of the patient as the center piece of medical services.
Guidelines for this were given at a special symposium held by the Sri Lanka
medical association on the theme of doctors and human rights.
Though many such gatherings in recent years have been sponsored by drug
companies the organisers of this SLMA symposium held at the Hotel Lanka
Oberoi decided to steer away from questionable ethical practices and obtain
sponsorship from the Center for Policy Alternatives.
In a keynote speech the medical luminary Prof. Carlo Fonseka pointed
out that the peoples' right to good health did not merely mean the absence
of disease-that was only a symptom. Instead the right to good health meant
fullness and wholeness in physical health, mental health and social health
in terms of right relationships with others and the environment. Prof.
Fonseka in a philosophical analysis said all human kind from the beginning
of history was essentially searching for a way to overcome suffering and
attain happiness. Some basic needs like continuity and security, protection
and belonging, freedom and good health were vital aspects of that search.
He said medical professionals and others in the health care service needed
to rise above self interest and commit themselves to work for the well-being
of the people.
Eminent jurist Christie Weeramanthri made a shocking revelation about
the state of the world today with the gap between the rich and the poor
widening to explosive proportions. He said that as much as 50% of the resources
intelligence and potential of modern science was now linked to the military
establishment in producing weapons and other means of mass destruction.
In horrifying contrast only one per cent of resources of modern science
including medical science has been channelled to vital areas like the alleviation
of poverty. Human Rights activist Sunila Abeysekera and others also outlined
the need to work towards the empoverment of the patient and make patient
welfare the foundation of the medical service. They called on doctors to
treat patents with compassionate affection.
Prof. Susirith Mendis, Dean of the Ruhunu University's Medical Faculty
and patron of the Galle human rights movement alerted society to an axis
that was subtlety undermining or eroding human rights of people. Tragically
the axis comprised the courts, the chief medical officer and the police
inspector. Prof. N. Sivakumaran of the Colombo university's Faculty of
Law and a member of the Human Rights Commission challenged the ethics of
doctors when examining torture victims. He said there were several cases
where two doctors who examined one victim gave totally different observations
on the physical injuries indicating that one of them was not telling the
truth. The speakers also challenged the ethics of top doctors involved
in the current case where medical certificates had been issued to the Ratwatte
family.
A parallel symposium on the rational prescription and use of medicinal
drugs was also held by the SLMA on the same day. The focus there was the
provision of safe and effective drugs to the people at the lowest possible
cost under generic or cost-effective brand names. In the latest case of
exploitation by drug companies a patient warded at a private hospital said
he had been prescribed a drug costing about ninety rupees to be taken daily
for two months. Fortunately the patient checked with a Osu-Sala list and
found that the same drug was available under a generic name at less than
Rs. 5/- a tablet. If he had bought the tablet under the brand name he would
have paid as much as Rs. 5000 more for the two month quota, Eminent eye-surgeon
Dr. Reggie Seiman has also written to The Sunday Times pointing out how
a drug agent has manipulated the market to obtain double the price from
patients for an anesthetic use for an eye operation. In this backdrop consumer
affairs minister Ravi Karunanayake is taking urgent steps to set up about
150 CWE pharmacies where medicinal drugs could be sold under generic or
low cost brand names. The minister has also sought clarification from the
GMOA and the SLMA whether all doctors will be ready to do justice to patients
by prescribing drugs mainly under generic or low cost brand names. |