Back
to plain Karu from "Kaluwara"
At last the country's crippling power cuts are off and one has to
thank the affable Power and Energy Minister Karu Jayasuriya and
his team for that. Jayasuriya on Thursday announced that power cuts
in force since July 2, 2001 would be lifted completely on May 15.
"The power cuts would be off on May 15. Dark nights are over,"
said a beaming Jayasuriya at a news conference.
For the minister,
it is a case of going back to being a "plain Mr. Jayasuriya"
instead of being dubbed "Kaluwara" (dark) Jayasuriya because
of the initial struggle to come to grips with the situation. Jayasuriya
has a lot to be cheerful about because his job was on the line if
he failed to end power shortages by next month. In January this
year, Jayasuriya - a former chairman of the ruling United National
Party (UNP) - vowed to quit by June if the power cuts were not completely
lifted by that time.
Sri Lanka has been facing power cuts ranging from one hour to eight
hours since July 2 last year. Many of the problems were blamed on
the former People's Alliance government for poor planning in the
power sector which led to the crisis.
As much as the
need for peace, the power crisis was also a crucial issue at last
December's parliamentary polls in which the UNP-led coalition secured
a victory over the alliance. The government's failure to solve the
power crisis which has affected everyone was one of the reasons
for the downfall of the Chandrika Kumaratunga government, many analysts
say.
The new regime
didn't have it easy either; in fact extending power cuts to daytime
from night as the situation worsened. With the dry spell of weather
continuing, it dashed the hopes of the authorities who were praying
that the hydropower water catchment reservoirs would fill up, enabling
the turbines to work.
While peace
and the recovery of the economy may be the biggest challenges of
this government, issues like power and the rising cost of living
are equally important to ordinary Sri Lankans. The power crisis
has affected residents of this country across the island. From students,
parents, businessmen, tourists to the ordinary man/woman on the
street, everyone has been hit by the power shortages. The crime
rate increased as thieves broke into dimly lit homes at night. Industries
were compelled to buy generators or face huge losses.
The use of generators
increased production costs which businessmen in turn passed on to
the consumer. It was a national and unending problem faced by the
people who were particularly annoyed by casual remarks from the
former Power Minister Anuruddha Ratwatte who once said the country
was dependent on hydropower and if there was no rain, there were
no solutions.
"Why do
we need a minister if he is going to depend on rain to give us power?"
was a question many of us asked at the time. When the new government
took over the reins of office, the deficit in the power sector was
200 megawatts. Officials said that while the demand for power was
1,400 megawatts, only 1,200 megawatts could be generated through
hydro and thermal power plants.
That situation
has since then changed to a surplus position. Jayasuriya said there
is now a surplus of 200 megawatts with 1,600 megawatts of generation
capacity as against a demand of 1,400 megawatts. Thankfully the
authorities are not going to depend on hydropower generation anymore
in their long-term arrangements.
By setting targets towards ending the power crisis and vowing to
quit if he was unable to do so, Jayasuriya has set a precedent that
other ministers should emulate.
Often ministers
set targets but fail to set personal goals like in the Jayasuriya
case.
Targets are not met and no one bothers. The power crisis is as important
as the peace process and any failure on Jayasuriya's part to end
the crisis by June would have forced him to resign. But by working
towards achieving this target and completing it before schedule,
the minister has created a new work ethos in this country, which
the present government - if it was smart - would do well to implement.
It would be
wonderful if all ministers are given a set of objectives with sufficient
resources and told to complete it within a specific period or quit.
Tea
- outlook for 2002 bearish
Following the global trend, the market in Colombo was one of the
weakest since 1999. In that year prices crashed following the financial
crisis in Russia, but in 2001 the market was driven by the high
supply position particularly in Kenya. Most major producer exporting
countries recorded significant production gains in the first quarter
of 2001, on top of a strong 4Q in 2000.
Market prices
in dollar terms declined for all categories of tea, but the worst
hit was the teas from the higher elevations. In spite of favourable
weather both quality seasons were a financial failure.
The average
price per kilo in 4Q 2000 was $1.81 - 1.89. In January 2001 the
total national average price per kg was $1.81. The market slipped
continually and bottomed out at $1.44 in July - a drop of 20 percent.
Values picked up thereafter and closed at $1.62. If 1999 is treated
as an exception; one has to go back to 1995 for comparable levels
of price.
Outside Sri
Lanka increasingly poorer orthodox teas of Vietnamese, South Indian
and even Indonesian origin are being passed off as Ceylon Tea. At
the same time brands that were based on a pure Ceylon Tea standard
have been diluted with other origins.
In Russia for
example blends containing minimal quantities or no Ceylon tea are
being labelled as 'Ceylon tea'. Further, unauthorised use of the
Lion Logo is rampant. There has been little or no action to counter
this phenomenon which seems to be growing at an alarming pace.
Production
An eight-year trend of continuous production increases was broken
in 2001, when Sri Lanka tea production declined to 295 million kg.
This is a drop of 3.5 percent or 10 million kg on the previous record
of 305.8 million kg. Production in 1999 was 283.7 million kg. In
fact, since 1994 each year's harvest has been a new record.
The problem in 2001 was the drought that affected production in
the higher elevations in particular. High growns were the worst
hit and declined 10 percent year-on-year 2000. The quantity of 75
million kg produced in 2001 is the lowest since 1996. Peak production
from this elevation was 91 million kg in 1965 and it was all downhill
thereafter until the mid-1990s when privatisation changed the trend.
The low country production base rests on four major growing areas-
Galle, Ratnapura, Deniyaya and Matara. These districts account for
75 percent of all Low Growns.
Galle was the
largest tea growing agro-climatic district in Sri Lanka in 2000
and accounts for nearly 15 percent of the country's production.
In 2001 Galle was worst hit by the dry spell and was the only major
growing area in the Low Grown sector to record a shortfall. Ratnapura
has taken over as the prime tea producing area in the country in
2001.
In the High
Grown planting districts all major growing areas recorded a crop
shortfall.
Worst hit on the western slopes was the Agrapatana Valley (-13 percent)
and Nanuoya/Lindula/Talawakelle agro-climatic district (-12 percent).
On the Eastern side of the island too the drought had its impact.
The two highest
producing agro-climatic districts Demodara/Haliella/Badulla and
Malwatte/Welimada recorded a drop in production by 8 percent and
11 percent respectively. The sharpest drop in 2001 compared with
2000 came from Balangoda (-35 percent).
Haputale declined
by 20 percent. The success story for the region, however, was Madulsima
district where production actually increased two percent from 2.58
million kg to 2.63 million kg. Nuwara Eliya too did well to maintain
production at around 2000 levels.
Our forecast
for national production for 2002 is 310 million kg. This is based
on the assumption that High and Mid-Growns maintain year 2000 levels
and that Low Growns increase from 166 to 170 million kg. This assumes
that the weather remains constant. We are concerned, however, because
the Regional Plantation Company's (RPCs) are due to re-negotiate
the collective agreement in June.
Historically
they have often led to work stoppages, go-slows and sabotage before
agreement is reached. An interesting, perhaps historical, development
in South India has seen unions agree to wage cuts while accepting
productivity related incentives. This would be a useful model for
Sri Lanka.
Tea exports
Sri Lanka exported a record quantity of 293 million kg in 2001 -
an increase of five million kg on the previous record of 288 million
kg shipped in 2000. Exporting 293 million kg in a year when total
production is declared at 296 million kg is an excellent performance.
Considering
that domestic consumption is in excess of 20 million kg, one would
have to assume that there were some carry over stocks from the previous
year.
But how much is a question that will not be easily answered. Over
the past five years exports have averaged between 90- 94 percent
of production.
Last year's
export figure amounts to 99 percent of total production. If first
quarter tea production in 2002 continues low, then traders would
need to rely heavily on current availability to meet market requirements.
Over the past five years exports have increased nine percent to
293 million kg from 268 million kg in 1997. During this period bulk
tea shipments have grown 19 percent from 148 million kg to 176 million
kg.
Exports in this
form have increased in absolute terms but have grown primarily at
the expense of packet tea.
Value Addition
- Challenges for the future
The
most significant developments in 2001 as far as value addition in
Sri Lanka is concerned, are that Russia, Ukraine and Saudi Arabia
have increased import duty on value added imports. These three markets
are amongst the largest for value added exports from Sri Lanka.
Further, it is possible that other countries in the Middle East
could follow the Saudi policy.
We see a pattern
in these developments that will have long term implications for
Sri Lanka's tea industry. Many of the markets importing value added
Ceylon tea were at relatively early stages of market development,
at least as far as tea is concerned.
Many national marketers, who initially concentrated on establishing
brands and gaining market share, were mastering the nuances of the
value addition process.
They are now actively developing (or have developed) on shore capability.
Sri Lanka has been moving from market to market as this process
of evolution unfolded.
Egypt is a good example of a market lost and Saudi Arabia of one
in change.
The Australian market on the other hand represents a good model
of reactive response that has succeeded. This is one way, but it
is not easily replicated nor will it provide answers to the short-
and mid-term issues that have emerged.
Following the
depreciation of the rupee, the value of exports grew 16 percent
year-on-year 2000. In dollar terms, however, export earnings totalled
$691 million and showed little change over the previous year. Declining
dollar earnings on a per kilo basis has been steady and 2001 is
the lowest in the last five years. Based on market forecasts for
value of tea and level of value addition targeted, we do not expect
2002 to show any improvement.
A Review of Prime Destinations
The CIS has emerged as the prime destination for Sri Lanka tea exports
for the seventh successive year. Export volumes have increased steadily
each year since 37 million kg was shipped in 1995 to peak at the
2001 figure of 63 million kg, an increase of 70 percent over the
period.
Direct shipments
to this market have accounted for 22 percent of all Sri Lanka's
tea exports. Further we estimate that at least another 2-4 percent
(6-10 million kg) of tea is shipped indirectly through neighbouring
countries. The main market in this grouping is Russia, for which
complete data is not available. Direct shipments, however, reflect
a share of 79 percent or 50 million kg of total exports to the region.
In 2001 Russia/CIS has emerged as the largest buyer of bulk (32
million kg), packet tea (20 million kg) and tea bags (3.8 million
kg).
The second most
important region for Sri Lanka tea exports is the Middle-East and
North Africa to which 54 percent (162 million kg) tea have been
shipped. The U.A.E, which is gaining significance as a regional
hub, is the prime destination in the Middle East having absorbed
34 million kg. The U.A.E. is the second largest destination after
Russia/CIS. 68 percent of imports have been in bulk form almost
entirely for re-export. Libya increased imports by 100 percent to
18.9 million kg, becoming the third most important market.
Turkey, Iraq,
Iran, Saudi Arabia and Jordan follow and are featured in the top
ten markets for Sri Lanka tea exports in 2001. Sri Lankan tea exports
in 2001 reached over 60 countries. 93 percent of exports was concentrated
in the regions studied previously. North and South America accounted
for four percent of the balance with Chile growing in significance
having absorbed 5.6 million kg.
Market forecast 2002
The market for tea in 2002 will be greatly influenced by factors
both national and international that trace their origins to the
previous year. While global tea production will determine market
prices as in the case of any commodity; the performance of Kenya
has proven to have the greatest direct impact on prices in Colombo.
In effect, while tea is a global commodity all teas are not substitutable.
Further, India
and Sri Lanka have discovered that the nature of buyer-seller relationships
is equally important. This explains the sometimes seemingly unjustified
price differences that exist between the three major auction centres
of Colombo, Mombassa and Calcutta.
In India the
tea industry is going through one of its worst periods with many
plantations ceasing to be viable as prices crash and costs rise.
In Sri Lanka too the situation is much the same particularly in
the case of plantations in the higher elevations.
The higher yielding
(and therefore lower cost) producing countries particularly those
in Africa are still profitable even at current price levels. Under
industry pressure India has commissioned studies that have looked
long and hard at its massive internal market and relatively smaller
export activity.
Shrinking consumption
static or shrinking domestic consumption has compelled more vigorous
generic promotion nationally. At the same time shrinking export
volumes and values are to be boosted. India's international efforts
seem to focus on countering apparent gains made by Sri Lanka. Given
the limited market penetration of India's value added products,
it is likely that the first wave of activity will target price-based
competitive strategy.
In markets such
as Russia/CIS import duties are baised against value added products.
Sri Lanka's strength is its value added presence. The Indian factor
could therefore impact on Sri Lanka's tea prices in the short and
medium term.
Vietnam turned the coffee world upside down by emerging as a major
producer in a short period of ten years. Today the country is actively
expanding its tea production capacity and is investing in factories
and systems. International donor agencies assisting in these ventures
seem content to do so irrespective of the impact on other developing
countries.
The country
is targeting production of 150 million kg over the next ten years.
Its product focus seems to be green tea and orthodox black tea manufacture.
This race for volume in all producer countries will accelerate the
"commoditisation" of tea and ensure low value supply to
international packers. A classic example is the present retail price
of coffee in a market where the price of this commodity has been
in a state of collapse over the last two years.
Crucial Markets
The Middle East and North Africa are crucial markets for orthodox
Ceylon teas. Stability in the region has been undermined following
recent global developments. Implications for other markets too are
significant as movement of tea is primarily through the Suez Canal.
Shipping and insurance costs would rise and invariably will come
out of the tea price.
Our sentiment
for 2002 and 1Q 2003 is bearish, particularly for High and Mid-
Grown sectors. In Sri Lanka wage revisions are due mid-year. If
wage increases are not linked to productivity the situation for
plantations will be critical. We feel that the depreciation of the
rupee could slow down and its rate will not compensate for declining
tea prices in dollar terms. Sri Lanka will therefore need to gear
up for a tough year.
The only glimmer
of hope is the possibility that the Free Trade Agreement with Pakistan
will go through by end-2002. Sri Lanka would be lobbying for a fast-track
agreement on tea, targeting a 20 million kg quota. Also, there is
talk of El-Nino affecting Africa in 2002- 2003. An industry cannot,
however, be run on the expectation that a problem will cripple a
competitor.
(Courtesy: Asia Siyaka Commodities)
|