Hi-tech House in
hostile mood
By Dilrukshi Handunnetti, Our Lobby Correspondent
The new electronic equipment installed to ensure a 'conscience vote'
for legislators experienced many hiccups throughout last week as the
system regularly failed, plunging the House into moments of silence
interrupting the debate. The installation, hurriedly put in place
to uphold a legislator's right to a conscience vote is a little like
the opening of the A9 road- officially open yet not fully in operation.
It seems that
the Prime Minister is keen to play the role of unrepentant messiah,
first attempting to usher in peace and then introducing an expensive
electronic voting system to Parliament to restore legislators' collective
conscience! Whilst technical problems plagued the House, Thursday
saw an opposition attempt towards militant debating as the ceasefire
agreement between the State and the LTTE was debated again. In contrast
to the original debate moved by the JVP, this debate lacked lustre
and somewhat superficial.
While many made
glossy observations on the MoU, it was PA's Mangala Samaraweera
who demanded responses to questions that plague the minds of the
public. Charged with emotion, he thundered that people were clueless
about the negotiations, accusing the MoU of being a mere blueprint
for the establishment of a defacto Eelam. Finding fault with alleged
LTTE attempts to equate Prabhakaran to Nelson Mandela, he said it
was a joke to even consider, as Mandela was a man who had made numerous
sacrifices for a righteous cause.
"This barbarian
has sacrificed nothing to achieve peace. The SLFP reiterates that
a claim for Eelam is non-negotiable but extensive power devolution
within a 'united' Sri Lanka is acceptable." There should not
be any de-proscription until talks achieve substantive progress
and a permanent de-proscription if talks successfully end,"
he declared.
He added that
the SLFP stood for the 1997 draft constitution which proposed the
creation of a union of regions and stated that an interim administration
should only be a stopgap, and one that should be essentially pluralistic
in character. If Samaraweera's passionate claims reflected public
trepidation about the ongoing process, Mahinda Rajapakse in contrast
sounded somewhat muddled when he opened the debate. The opposition
leader put his foot in the mouth, while expressing grave concerns
about the process, also stated that the SLFP was opposed to an interim
administration.
He noted with
concern that over 300 violations of the MoU had been committed by
the LTTE leading to questions on the validity of the effectiveness
of the monitoring mission.
He alleged the LTTE was fortifying itself despite army presence
and was preparing for war again."The LTTE recently assaulted
an eastern based SLFP organiser, extorted his money because his
son could not be conscripted," he charged.
Firing his salvos
early morning was Nimal Siripala de Silva. He dubbed incumbent Premier
as Don Juan Dharmapala of the present day, willing to sacrifice
territorial integrity for a mess of pottage. Breathing fire, the
burly MP thundered that a letter sent by 123 distinguished signatories
including Bishop Desmond Tutu questioned the legitimacy of the peace
process. "There were questions about the focus of the MoU and
the sustainability of the accord. This letter has been carefully
concealed from the public. The Amnesty International too recently
condemned the LTTE's proscription of children," he said.
Adding that
the PA had no wish to scuttle the peace process but to ensure that
aspects of national security were not overlooked in the prevailing
euphoria, he thundered that the LTTE had recently received massive
supplies of arms by boats that had been apprehended by the Navy.
He said the worst travesty was that the Defence Ministry concealed
the truth from the world.
Prof. G.L. Peiris,
the man who spearheaded the peace mission for the PA and today for
the UNF was next. The law professor attempted to impress upon the
members that their inability to conduct the census in the east proved
that the writ of the government did not extend there.
" We cannot
simply wish away this reality but should grapple with it. It is
unfair to say that the government was turning a blind eye to the
violations of the MoU by the LTTE. Whenever LTTE cadres roamed areas
under government control, in uniform or with arms, they have been
apprehended. Recently the Navy blew up an LTTE's arm-laden vessels.
"We don't
condone atrocities nor are we lax about national security. This
is why we wish to initiate a dialogue with the LTTE urgently,"
he said. Making his customary passion filled speech was JVP's Wimal
Weerawansa who thundered that peace could not be a mere word, a
piece of paper but a ground reality that has a future.
The JVP group
leader claimed that The Sunday Times defence column had reported
about the arrival of 11 arms-laden LTTE vessels, a fact the government
took pains to conceal.
Drawing attention
to the incident of holding 130 civilians in house detention for
refusing to allow the conscription of their children, he said, "While
you bend backwards to please the Tigers, what assurance have they
given us? Their demands for a separate state and a traditional homeland
remain the same while they have not yet handed over a single weapon
as a symbol of peace. We have opened roads, relaxed security and
allowed infiltration. When the entire nation pays for UNF policy,
Minister Peiris will be overseas, Minister Moragoda serving the
Pentagon while we will have nowhere to go," said.
After Weerawansa's
fire, minister S.B. Dissanayake's delivery was unusually diluted
as he attempted to balance the act. Amidst opposition wisecracks
about his fortunes altering lately, the cherubic minister noted
that it was tragic that two communities that have nurtured each
other, shared religious, cultural and language bonds were so divided
that they could not sit together to talk.
"Before
you pick holes in the process, turn the search light inwards. The
opposition leader claims that the SLFP is opposed to an interim
administration, the PA having promised a 10 -year rule during its
tenure. How was it acceptable to you then while you oppose it now?
If this is not the answer, suggest an alternative power sharing
arrangement" he said adding that if the war breaks out, the
UNF would go for a military solution with the full backing of the
international community.
Not to be outdone
by Wimal Weerawansa's skillful delivery, the UNF fielded Dr. Rajitha
Senaratne who waxed eloquent. "The communal tune is 50 years
long, too long for an evolving nation to desperately cling to. The
country has undergone vast socio-economic and political changes.
But it is the same rhetoric with new faces. R.G. Senanayake has
been replaced by Dinesh Gunawardene and Rohana Wijeweera by Wimal
Weerawansa, that is the only difference," he charged.
Enjoying his
kill, the lands minister said President Kumaratunga in an interview
with the CNN has claimed that she fully backed the peace effort
and was actually the first to offer an interim administration as
a solution to the problem.
"But she
also committed hara-kiri by admitting that she was being regularly
briefed by the Prime Minister on the ongoing process, contrary to
the SLFP claims that they were clueless. If you are clueless, get
a clue from your President who's being regularly briefed, and don't
pick bones with us," he said, tongue in cheek.
Amused by opposition
claims that Prabhakaran should attend talks after relinquishing
all his demands, the minister said that if Prabhakaran did that,
there would be nothing to talk about.
"It is
the height of immaturity to believe that a man who has led a military
struggle would drop his demands now. We need to negotiate on his
demands to arrive at a consensus. If he gives up his demands, do
we discuss his health when formal talks begin," he scoffed.
|