Garment industries
plead for help
By Cassian M. Fernando
A prominent banker recently stated in an article that small and
medium sector industrialists need special legislation for them to
exist. We cannot agree more. Although there are nearly 20,000 small
and medium scale industrial undertakings in the country successive
governments have done very little to alleviate their pressing problems.
The
small and medium scale apparel manufacturers are appealing
to the government to provide relief measures to overcome the
present crisis. The writer has suggested that financial assistance
should be in the form of a loan to be converted into a grant
on improved performance. (Library photo).
|
If anything
was done it was under Philip Gunawardane. As minister of industries
he gave all assistance to the Industrial Development Board to function
as the catalyst as well as facilitator for the development of small
and medium scale industries. Although trade chambers especially
the federation of chambers drew the attention of the governments
to promulgate a state policy towards small and medium scale industries,
such suggestions and appeals have fallen on deaf ears.
The situation
became worse with the free trade economy. It was cheaper and more
profitable for businessmen to import rather than produce. A large
number of small-scale industries were compelled to close down. The
manufacturing sector received a deathblow due to the open economy
policies since 1977.
However, the
small and medium sectors in the apparel industry managed to survive
due to its competitive nature. During the initial stages of the
apparel industry 65 percent of exports were accounted for by the
small and medium sectors. Even with the opening of the Free Trade
Zone at Katunayake the small and medium sectors survived. Garment
factories in the FTZ were allocated a definite quantum of quotas
and they were entitled only to the annual growth in relation to
the specific quotas that were allocated to them.
They had no
access to the free quota pool nor to the bulk of the country's quota.
Garment manufacturers elsewhere in the country also had relatively
small quota allocations as their own. But they did not bother as
they had access to the various pool quota schemes announced from
time to time. The small and medium sectors grew in this manner.
Whenever they had extra orders they could go to the Textile Ministry
and obtain the required quotas.
200 factories
Then came late R. Premadasa's ambitious 200 garments factories programme.
The prime minister had the vision of taking industries to the rural
sector and believed that he could bring about a radical change in
the economic well being of the innocent peasants in the vast rural
areas. No doubt the idea was noble, but created a serious setback
to the small and medium scale apparel exporters who were already
in business. A majority of the small-scale manufacturers had invested
everything they had in the industry and they had no opportunity
of going in to the 200-garments factories programme. The restrictions
placed on quotas to the factories in the FTZ were removed. Three
such factories got as much as 100,000 dozen each in the hottest
category at that time. By these allocations made to the new factories
under this programme and the common pool became thin. The existing
manufacturers who had very little as their own performance quota
were left high and dry as the quotas in the free pool were inadequate.
That was the beginning of the serious problems that had to be encountered
by the small factories.
The bomb attacks
on the World Trade Centre in the US and the recession experienced
there and the European Union worsened the situation. The apparel
industry in Sri Lanka has never faced a crisis as it is facing today.
The C.M.P. prices have dropped by a minimum of 30 percent. This
is a problem faced by all manufacturers whether they are large or
small. The declining prices have come at a time when the other local
costs have shown a sharp increase. Within a space of 24 months electricity
costs have increased by more than 50 percent.
With other increases
in fuel, telephone and water rates, not only the costs to the factories
have increased, but also that of local raw materials. Manufacturers
have to pay higher prices for poly bags, cartons, thread and other
packing materials. With an acute shortage of skilled labour, labour
costs too have risen. A factory cannot find good sewing operators
even at Rs. 3,750 per month which is 25 percent more than the approved
wages.
To keep the
workers coming to work additional attendance incentives have to
be paid. Even with such additional payments, you will be lucky to
find a factory operating above 70 percent efficiency due to lack
of operators.
In this manner
the factories are losing heavily each month. The situation has been
so from around October last year and the indications are that the
downward trend will continue at least till July. October last year
to July this year is a long time for the factories to get into serious
liquidity difficulties from which only a handful of factories will
be able to bounce back.
It is therefore
time that the government came to the rescue of the apparel industry.
The garment industry is the flagstaff industry of Sri Lanka. In
terms of foreign exchange it earns over 50 percent. In terms of
employment it is the sector that provides the largest percentage
of employment to women. Direct and indirect employment exceed 500,000.
There is also employment generation to supporting industries like
thread, carton and poly bag manufacture. A large number of clearing
agencies depend to a large extent on the garment industry. If the
industry is sick or facing difficulties it is the duty of the government
to come to its rescue.
Others helped
Governments at various times have shown their eagerness to help
other industries facing difficulties. When DC mill owners in the
coconut industry want to modernise their factories, monies are doled
out from the cess. Some 75 percent of such advances are outright
grants and the mill owners have to pay only 25 percent.
When the occupancy
rate is below 25 percent hotel owners are paid advances to cover
their losses. Even now the government doles out monies for the expansion
of the hotel industry, making it possible for them to face an encouraging
future with the peace process.
When green leaf
tea prices fall below the floor prices, monies are paid to tea small
holders to save them from bankruptcy. Even when tea prices fell
below the floor prices, there was a time when monies were paid from
the tea cess. All the above are not loans but outright grants.
When textile
manufacturers faced the prospect of closure due to the free trade
policy, the government doled out nearly one billion rupees to pay
off bank loans. The Treasury and the previous government virtually
agreed to write off such monies advanced, but implementation of
this decision was delayed due to a large manufacturer claiming a
huge sum he had advanced to his own company. There is every prospect
that this government may consider writing off the huge sums advanced.
In the circumstances
why cannot the government announce relief measures towards rescuing
the apparel sector?
The fact that
the apparel industry is facing a crisis is real and not a myth.
The prime minister in his policy statement in parliament stated
that near 50 percent of the garment factories may have to be closed
down. Even in his May day address he expressed the same view.
According to
the latest Central Bank figures, although there is an overall increase
in total export earnings for the first quarter, income from garment
exports has declined. The decline is 23.3 percent. This was a combined
effect of a 12.9 percent drop in value and 11.9 percent drop in
unit prices - mainly due to lower demand from the US.
Why not us?
The sector most
affected by the present crisis is the small and medium sector. Out
of a total of 856 exporters, 454 factories come within the small
and medium sector. In addition there are over 100 units who are
not exporters, but sub-contractors. This sector too is very badly
affected. Most of them are either temporarily closed down or work
only for a few months during the year depending on the orders.
Realising that
a crisis of this nature would arise the SME sector lobbied heavily
with the Treasury, the Ministry and BOI authorities. Initially there
was no prospect of any support from the authorities.
However, the
situation changed with the understanding of the seriousness of the
problem by such authorities like Dr. P.B. Jayasundara, then Secretary
to the Treasury, the Central Bank, and also then Chairman, Textile
Board, Tilan Wijesinghe. As TQB chairman, Wijesinghe asked the four
associations to submit their proposals.
The four associations
submitted very different proposals. Having studied these proposals,
Wijesinghe submitted his own proposals incorporating most of the
recommendations of the associations. The associations were requested
to study this paper and submit their comments.
At this juncture
the four associations arrived at certain decisions and a joint memorandum
signed by the chairman of the four associations was submitted to
Wijesinghe.
Wijesinghe having
received a unanimous endorsement of the associations to most of
his proposals submitted a board paper to the president and also
the minister. The board paper recommended among other things the
establishment of a restructuring fund. Although the four associations
had different views on the increase in cess levied from garment
exporters, Wijesinghe recommended the increase of cess from Rs.
1 to Rs. 3 per piece. These monies were to be ploughed back to the
industry.
These recommendations
were included in the budget proposals of 1999. When it was known
that the cess was to be increased to three rupees, the large manufacturers
objected. The minister was prevented from giving teeth to the budget
proposals. Due to the adverse trade conditions prevailing, even
the deduction of the cess of one rupee was also suspended. Some
of the big manufacturers took the position that they should not
pay for the benefit of the "lesser mortals". What the
small manufacturers are asking is not unreasonable or unattainable.
If the government could give assistance to other sectors in the
industry, similar assistance should be given to the apparel industry
as well.
To survive in
a competitive market in the quota free era, a large number of small
manufacturers have to upgrade their factories, facilities granted
to workers and infrastructure. They also have to upgrade at least
25 percent of the machinery in keeping with the technological advances.
They need assistance in marketing. A minimum of six buyer-seller
meetings should be arranged in this sector each year for the next
two years.
All these need
funds and the small manufacturers have offered all their assets
to obtain bank facilities. They have nothing more to offer. As pointed
out by the Secretary to the Ministry Ranjit Fernando, the survival
of the small and medium sector was largely due to the accommodating
lending policies of the Bank of Ceylon and the People's Bank. If
not for the patronage of these state banks the small industries
would not have survived this long.
They are ever
grateful to these state banks for their patronage and understanding
and very often, granting credit facilities without gilt-edged securities
demanded by other commercial banks. If these two state banks are
to be privatised - god save the small industrialists of Sri Lanka.
Bail out
package
The small sector doesn't expect the government to bail out all the
454 small factories. That is unrealistic and such assistance will
require a large reservoir of funds. If the government could come
forward and assist at least 100 to 150 factories, at 50 factories
per year, these small factories will succeed in upgrading their
factories to the standards demanded by the buyers. Then the government
would have achieved a lot. Selecting the factories may be on the
strength of the number of years in exports, number of employees
and the export turnover. The factories to be eligible to receive
such assistance should be those employing a minimum of 50 and having
not more than 150. Each factory may be offered assistance not exceeding
8 to 10 million rupees. Such assistance should be in the form of
an outright grant or a loan to be converted into a grant on increased
performance.
The existence
of the small and medium sector in a non-quota era is very important
from the point of view of the country. Competitiveness will be the
key factor in keeping buyers attracted to the country.
In economics
it is well known that there are advantages in small-scale industries
for very often the owner, the members of the family and close relations
are on the production floor.
This cuts back
enormous costs a large manufacturer has to fork out for heavily
paid senior and middle level management. The factory and administration
overheads are much lower than that of large manufacturers.
Small manufacturers
can undertake small orders without losing, whereas it would be a
loss for a large manufacturer to undertake such small quantities,
per style/order.
Even with very
tight delivery schedules, the small manufacturer could cope because
the quantities involved are manageable. It is realising these advantages
of small scale entrepreneurs that India has earmarked the apparel
industry as an industry for the small and medium sector and reserved
the textile manufacturer to the giants.
It is also well known that the CMP prices have come down drastically
during the last few months.
And very often
buyers have preferred to place these orders in countries such as
Bangladesh, Vietnam, Madagascar, Kenya and Botswana. Some large
Sri Lankan manufacturers have even shifted their factories to these
countries. When buyers were asked why they are moving away from
Sri Lanka, they maintain that the Standard Minute Valuation in those
countries is below 0.05 US cents, whereas it is as high as 0.08
to 0.15 US cents in Sri Lanka. It is here that the small manufacturers
can come to the scene. The Standard Minute Valuation in most of
the small factories is as low as 0.03 cents per minute. The buyers
are prepared to go up to even 0.05 cents.
Struggling
for survival
Thus you will see that the small manufacturer has the comparative
advantage of offering competitive prices. They are not lacking in
quality, delivery and good relations with the buyers. They only
lack the very rigid compliance requirements dictated by buyers.
It is mostly to overcome such difficulties that they need financial
support from the government. If the small sector is developed as
in India we can bring back to Sri Lanka the orders that the buyers
are at present placing with new countries. The government should
make use of this opportunity to the maximum. One hundred percent
of the small and medium scale manufacturers are Sri Lankans.
Whether there
are quotas or not these companies will stay in Sri Lanka unlike
the multinationals who would run away from Sri Lanka when quotas
are withdrawn and when they find cheaper markets outside Sri Lanka.
Ultimately the apparel industry will be in the hands of indigenous
exporters - the way it started some decades back. But the question
that one must ask is how many of them will survive to see that day?
The prime minister
and the relevant minister are doing the correct thing by lobbing
the US government to give Sri Lanka the same duty concessions that
it has offered to some other countries. Withdrawal of these duties
will make Sri Lanka very competitive.
The small and
medium sectors hope the prime minister will also give serious thought
to keeping this sector alive without allowing 50 percent of the
factories to close down.
|