Tyronne means to
try on and on and on
Shashi Tharoor
is no Shashi Kapoor. He is not dapper, he is not an actor, and he
is a writer of books. Anybody who is a writer of books is generally
not considered as charismatic as Shashi Kapoor.
But, anywhere
the post of UN Secretary General is mentioned, Shashi Tharoor is
mentioned. Jayantha Dhanapala is mentioned as well
.. but suddenly,
soon after, like mushrooms springing from the barnyard where the
pigs were kept for the night, soon after Dhanapala and Tharoor springs
the name of Tyronne. Not Tyrone Power. This seems to be all getting
mixed up. Tyronne Fernando is to Tyronne Power, the silver screen
classic actor, what Shashi Tharoor is to Shashi Kapoor.
Why does Tyrone
mushroom, always where Tharoor and Dhanapala have reclined? Well,
reclined in manner of speaking of course, but wherever Dhanapala
and Tharoor are mentioned, you could be sure that Tyronne Fernando
is trotting not far behind.
How does this
happen? Some bright young people said it is funny, he (Tyrone )
wants the job of Kofi Annan, and shakes his hand nevertheless. What's
this called now? The golden handshake? Talking of the golden handshake,
it does remind one of the Midas touch. Everything Midas touches
turns into gold. Tyrone has the Midas touch these days too. Except
that my mechanic says it is fixed in reverse gear, sort of.
Everything that's
gold seems to turn into black and white when Tyronne touches it.
The moment Tyronne touches the hand of Kofi Anan in order to give
him the golden handshake (so that Tyrone can occupy his seat), you
can be sure Anan will appear in the papers in black and white the
next day. Every paper will have it, Daily Mirror, Daily whatever
you may call it.
But this is
at a sustained level and come to think of it, like some coffin that
lies in the house in an extended wake, this sort of Tyrone for Secretary
General pose has been going on in the papers for an extended period
of time now. Who is to say that Fernando does not have his own yardstick
of who is right for the big job and who isn't?
Take this for instance. Even as I am writing this, I misspelt both
Fernando and Anan on my computer keyboard, as I am not a good typist
at all. But these computers do wonders for butter fingered typists.
There is the
automatic spellchecker. I immediately took the spellchecker to the
two words Fernando and Anan, and presto the spell checker obviously
recognises Fernando, because it asks 'do you want to change Fernanndoo
(that's how I misspellt it) to Fernando? But when I take it to Anans
(that's how I misspellt Anan) the spellchecker doesn't say 'do you
want to change it to Anan?' Hmmm, Fernando is big, and who's afraid
of Kofi Annan?
Now, they say
everywhere that Sahshi Tharoor is a writer, and Dhanapala is a diplomat
..
but Sahshi Tharoor's writing capabilities have been getting so much
press. Press! Now press is the operative word.
Shashi Tharoor
may have been getting a lot of press about his writing, but Fernando
is writing the press. Now wait a minute I am getting confused here
but let's take that again, slowly. Shashi Tharoor gets a lot of
press about his writing, But Fernando, he is writing the press.
Everytime Tharoor does something, Fernando lets slip to the press
that he is running too, and is running tight race at that. Again
Fernando seems to have tackled Tharoor, right? What's the difference,
Fernando would say - - 'writing gets the press -- writing the press'.
Same thing no?
By whatever
logic, Fernando knows how to keep in the race. That's the importance
of being Fernando. Shashi Tharoor may be a shoo in for Secretary
General. But that's only because Sahshi rhymes with shoo, right?
Come on, you don't second guess the next UN Secretary General?
|